There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
I have noticed that graphs after non runners are tending to show odds that have been matched at before the deduction.
Take the 13:30 race at Newbury, Kyntara matched at a high of 7.11 yet the graph shows money has been matched much higher!
Not very good Betfair at all!
Take the 13:30 race at Newbury, Kyntara matched at a high of 7.11 yet the graph shows money has been matched much higher!
Not very good Betfair at all!
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 11
|
By:
Still the same today!
|
|
By:
Haven't the graphs always repopulated to remove the impact of reduction factors?
|
|
By:
What has been backed and layed are shown alongside the graph and they are correct after a reduction factor but the graph does not paint the same pictue.
|
|
By:
I think the graphs are deliberately adjusted to remove the impact of the reduction factor and therefore maintain the integrity of price trend.
|
|
By:
ffs jamee - he's claiming that they haven't been adjusted.
|
|
By:
Correct!
|
|
By:
It's a relatively recent thing this on racing graphs - same misleading impression applies with VAR voided goals where bets are adjusted but the graphs aren't.
My best guess is it either takes more processing power or manpower to adjust the graphs than they're willing to employ. |
|
By:
Considering Betfair introduced "beacons" to highlight hot and cold horses, you would think they would have the resources to ensure the graphs are 100% correct.
|
|
By:
Had a chat with betfair and they have raised this as an issue with the tech team.
Fingers crossed the graphs are fixed soon. |
|
By:
Looks like it has been fixed. Many thanks to Betfair Tech Team!
|
|
By:
thank God for that.
|