There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
27 Aug 23
16:51
Joined:
Date Joined:
07 Sep 18
i thort they had went slightly right..
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 70
|
By:
6 of 1 and slight nudge near line ..didnt affect result imo
|
|
By:
Where the hell is the market?
|
|
By:
Second carried the winner right, then the winner brushed the second as it tried to keep its line.
Should keep the race imo. Back (Bet For) Odds Stake Profit Yes 1.48 £200.00 £96.00 |
|
By:
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plus/en/horse-racing/specials-betting-27088631
|
|
By:
1f out the winner has went sl left..then the 2nd has went sl right..then they nuge each other 10yds out..harsh to disq winner imo.
|
|
By:
revised result..poor decision.
|
|
By:
Stands I think
|
|
By:
???
|
|
By:
Oh. Bloody sportinglife.
|
|
By:
BHA Stewards
@BHAStewards · 23s R6 @Goodwood_Races *Placings Revised* as follows: First – THE GATEKEEPER (IRE) Second – THUNDER BALL |
|
By:
is that a 1.01 kapoot?
|
|
By:
ws trying to find specils mrket to get out of my bet nd couldnt find it. got lucky. unlike screming
|
|
By:
theyre a joke they settled the win market right after the klaxon
|
|
By:
yes..went 101 in foto.
|
|
By:
Hard to bet on any photo now, unless they're on opposite sides of the track.
As for betting on enquiries, it's time to admit I haven't got a clue. |
|
By:
Unbelievable
|
|
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves 27 Aug 23 17:10
Hard to bet on any photo now, unless they're on opposite sides of the track. thats always been the caveat. |
|
By:
nobody hs ny more. nd some never did
|
|
By:
Stewards are a shambles
|
|
By:
if that's the standard nearly every race should have amended placings.
|
|
By:
yes they were nudging each other slightly..could ewe really be sure it cost the 2nd the race though?
|
|
By:
About time had smidgen of luck, had 200 win on gatekeeper in the shops, picked up winnings
|
|
By:
wd..i had 5k on in betfred..on way now to collect on my mobility scooter.
|
|
By:
wd both, i had 10G on Buick 4-timer, just arranging skip for pick up.
|
|
By:
Missed out on treble, 4.20 race had royal Dubai, knew that was the weakest link, should picked the winner was proven over distance, stuck to my original bet was going to be 800 double ocean quest and the gate keeper
|
|
By:
Both well backed by time got to the bookies, lost 25% on the payout, shops all week doubles and trebles coming up
|
|
By:
Just missed out a massive payday, didn't go there - had laid Gatekeeper win pre race - when the fptp went to about 1.03 I laid off stake plus about a tenner, so didn't lose out...but considered a lumpy lay as I had inkling this would be a stewards...but didn't press the button. Typical.
|
|
By:
Posted proof of form study notes, pending approval , ready tomorrow
 |
|
By:
Some of these decisions recently???
Watched in real time and did not even consider a stewards. Only realised it had been reversed when I looked at the results just now!! |
|
By:
Must say, this one has to be one of the poorest DQs I've seen - the one promoted to winner caused some of the contact. Plus no way to be certain result was changed by such minimal contact.
|
|
By:
The gate keeper looked like it had won to me on the line, commentary where convinced and called it right for thunder ball, so if there was as any interference if deserved to be thrown out
|
|
By:
deserved even though promoted one caused some contact..?
|
|
By:
What a cheat just watched the replay, twice it interfered with the gate keeper, 2nd time you can see his deliberate move with his elbow, easy decision must of been
|
|
By:
what i find most annoying is the fact jockeys are allowed to go anywhere near the stewards room, and the 'best' talker can often sway it. The stewards can see what happened and the distance any interference may have cost another horse, why/how it happened is irrelevant.
|
|
By:
Worst decision since at least last week at Kempton!!
It's actually a shambles. |
|
By:
not seen the Kempton one what race was it?
|
|
By:
https://www.racingpost.com/results/1079/kempton-aw/2023-08-16/846101
And I was actually lucky enough to benefit from it!! |
|
By:
An enquiry was held to consider the placings in this race after interference inside the final ½ furlong when the winner, THUNDER BALL, ridden by Mohammed Tabti, interfered with THE GATEKEEPER (IRE), placed second, ridden by Rossa Ryan. The Stewards considered that the interference had improved THUNDER BALL’s placing as the gelding made contact with THE GATEKEEPER (IRE) on two occasions, causing THE GATEKEEPER (IRE) to be shifted left-handed off its intended course with a diminishing nose between them at the line. The Stewards revised the placings as follows: First – THE GATEKEEPER (IRE), Second – THUNDER BALL, Third – OUZO, Fourth – ESCOBAR (IRE), Fifth – SUDDEN AMBUSH. Tabti was cautioned for careless riding as he allowed his mount to drift left-handed without sufficient correction bumping THE GATEKEEPER (IRE) twice.
|
|
By:
tomo, I never knew that was reversed, I had the fptp never checked back! looked minimal from side on, head on must've shown something far worse with that winning distance.
|