|
By:
it doesn't have to be the jockeys fault to change a result. any interference and a nose , straight forward swap
|
|
By:
You must have filled your boots on here on this "straight forward swap" Hush.
|
|
By:
I laid the first past the post in the photo, then laid the eventual winner in the Enquiry. Beat that!
Selection Odds Stake (£) Bid type Placed Profit/Loss (£) Brave Emperor 1.39 98.21 Lay 26-Jan-23 13:37 98.21 Mohatu 1.78 46.61 Lay 26-Jan-23 13:41 -36.36 *Average odds: On Off Back subtotal: 0.00 Lay subtotal: 61.85 Market subtotal: 61.85 Commission @ 2.00%: 1.24 Net Market Total: 60.61 |
|
By:
any interference dead heat or nose gone , thats the way they're interpreting the rules now
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
From my perspective that was a poor decision. None of the riders stopped riding. I've seen horses almost put over the rails by the FPTP and result stands as it was 1/2 length in the winning margin.
|
|
By:
Tis just anything goes.
Could make an argument for either. |
|
By:
correct rico..anything goes.
|
|
By:
2nd
Horse silk 1 (1) Brave Emperor 39-10 4/1 T: A WatsonJ: L Morris Made most, pushed along 2f out, ridden entering final furlong, soon joined, driven inside final furlong, all out and edged right close home, gamely(placed 2nd) op 10/3 tchd 9/2 My Stable 1st Horse silk nse 3 (7) Mohatu 38-10 2/1f T: W J HaggasJ: Tom Marquand Tracked leaders, ridden 2f out, headway stand side entering final furlong, soon join winner, edged left towards finish, just held(placed 1st) tchd 5/2 Exactly how I saw the race. One edged right, one edged left. A joke of a decision. |
|
By:
Bigger horse slightly bumped , second btn 1cm . The only thing that was ridiculous was anybody saying with certainty what would have happened.Betting said it could go either way.Betting was right .
|
|
By:
I was on Mohatu (2nd, placed 1st) but, having seen it a few times from different angles... am feeling like it must be my birthday :-)
Very minor bump clearly caused by both drifting towards each other. Bonkers decision to reverse it, but thanks anyway, Southwell stewards!!! |
|
By:
I think the stewards were watching a different race looking at their report. Runner up will be reinstated upon appeal
|
|
By:
My understanding was that the stewards had to be sure that the runner up in these situations would have won. How anyone could say that with any certainty is beyond me.
|
|
By:
"Lost significant momentum" ..........nah, didnt
|
|
By:
come on runner up was flying ! agree it wasn't 'significant' but it didn't need to be , it was a nostril guys
zero chance of an appeal being successful and they won't even try. |
|
By:
It was entirely predictable that it would be reversed as they only seem to care about the winning margin and not the severity of the interference. Win by a nose and cause very minor interference and you will likely lose the race. Almost cause carnage and win by a couple of lengths and you are likely to keep it.
The rules have become ridiculous over the last couple of years. They need to understand that horses do not run in lanes and very minor interference is a part of the game. They should only be intervening when the interference is more severe than a very slight brush. |
|
By:
korrect.
|