|
By:
No agenda with me brigust1 just plainly telling the truth.Open your eyes and ears please and see what's going on.It was never ever going to be just a vigil.These women have exploited lots for their "agenda"In a sad way I feel sorry for you brigust1 in the fact you are exactly the"type" these women are abusing and you can't or don't want to face facts.You are displaying traits that these women want men like you to change or possibly castrated.
|
|
By:
That is where you err SQ. It was always going to be a vigil. Even the Duchess of Cambridge turned up. If we aren't getting past that one point, I am wasting my time because that is the main point. It was only after the Police rejected that idea that things changed, and quite rightly so. The rest of your point is just silly and misguided.
|
|
By:
i like to think those closest to sarah would know better than anyone tbh and once again here is one explainingWhen I first heard of the vigil for my friend Sarah Everard, I was looking forward to attending. But I won’t be -- it’s not a tribute to her anymore. Her death has been hijacked by an agenda. I don’t think Sarah would have wanted this,I also wish to publicly praise the police conducting this investigation. They have done their job brilliantly, and although sadly it is too late for Sarah, I am grateful they are finding us some of the answers that we so desperately need. I am sure they are equally stunned and appalled that this awful crime seems to have been perpetrated by one of their own.
As for us, her friends? Let us grieve for our loved one, brutally taken in such an awful way. The public reaction to her death has been overwhelming, and for the most part very touching. But be assured, the misuse of it by those with an ‘agenda’ is not a comfort to us. why she decided not to go media chose not to show footage of police being set about or the fk the police chanting , at a vigil ffs , lowlifes |
|
By:
glasgow bit of a red herring no doubt if some fans had turned it in to a protest against the police,like some obviously did at clapham,the police in scotland would have reacted in exactly the same way
|
|
By:
duchess sent out with no mask for a photo op i imagine , showing the sensitive side of the royal family
could be cynical but charlie and william coincidently in media with folk of colour last week aswell holding babies and healing the wounded with compassion and impartiality next imo |
|
By:
Hello: The Police shouldn't have been there in the first place. You are missing the whole point. From the moment they banned it the game was up.
|
|
By:
I can't wait for a spin off by the extreme wing- BLM- Butch Lesbian Masters!
|
|
By:
They'll be wanting men down on 2 knees, not just one!
|
|
By:
if it had been declared legal same outcome
if you start singing fk the police at a vigil theres something wrong with you tbh , these folk were nothing but disrespectful to the memory of sarah and her family /friends , i will say a minority tho as most were there for right reasons if police hadnt attended you would have the whole uk in arms asking why they are locked up or cant go to football etc while a crowd can legally gather for a vigil , its just the law being upheld which is what they were told to do |
|
By:
You are wrong in almost every respect Hello. Do you not get it? If the Police had not tried to stop it no protestors would have turned up. Why would they? That is the whole point. We all know some protestors look for any reason to protest but if the Police had allowed this to happen out of respect for Sarah no protestors would be there. That is their whole raison d'etre. It would have just been a respectful vigil. Why shouldn't they have been allowed to do that?
The girl's body had just been identified. It wasn't something to wait months for. The Police showed no respect for Sarah or those who think what happened to her shouldn't have happened. This is not a Police state. With every law there are exceptions. They know it but just ignored it. They were wrong. I understand when Rangers, for example, have thousands of fans celebrating their title win, where the Police arrested a number of people. But that was always likely to be celebratory and sticking two fingers up to the rules. It was not, and was never going to be, a vigil. There is a huge difference. |
|
By:
How many of these women were on the George Floyd vigil the guy that pleaded guilty to breaking into a womans house pointing a gun at her stomach and robbed her.
|
|
By:
They should have stayed at home imo.
So many people out there wanting something to rail against right now. I feel sorry for the police tbh, talk about [rock and hard place]. |
|
By:
brigust1 ,clear your mind of any thoughts you had on the matter.Now ask yourself who were the organisers of said event?If you don't know go and find out.They were told in court the gathering(at best) was illegal to take place but chose to ignore and carry on regardless.Lock them up everyone who can be identified.You appear to be purposely ignoring the facts,obtuse or perhaps you are the one on here with an agenda.Hope this helps you brigust1
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
Will you be giving Lostintranslation another chance, Sonko? The horse might have gone at the game but I've had a few quid on at 60 on here. Back at chelters, drying ground and the yard finding a bit of form.......its not completely out of the question that he could run a big one. |
|
By:
You don't seem to understand SQ. You must start at the beginning. A small group of women asked to do a vigil in remembrance of Sarah at a critical time and for heartfelt reasons. I see nothing wrong with that as long as they socially distance and wore masks. The Police refused and when they did they must have known the Human rights people would be down on them but they are so stupid they ploughed on anyway. Then to compound the fracture they tried to stop the vigil with dogs.
You are starting after the start and that is where you are wrong. Had the Police allowed this small gathering there would have been no problems but the idiots giving the orders threw the kitchen sink at it. When you grasp the idea that everything that followed the first Police decision has nothing to do with this then you will be seeing the wood for the trees. Everything that followed the first Police decision was bound to cause problems and they should have known that. It is therefore their fault making a mountain out of a molehill. Can you grasp that SQ? |
|
By:
No whippin, Tizzard is gone at the game.
|
|
By:
I'm not quite ready to hand in the divorce papers on Lostintranslation. And here's why: 1st run of the season was on heavy going. His only other 2 previous races on such going resulted in a 7/19 & 6/6. So I'm going to forgive him that one. Next, Kempton just isn't his track and also he's a better horse going LH. He jumped like a washing machine for his 2nd place at Sandown & the Carlisle race he won was a very weak affair. Now his final run is a little harder to make an excuse for but I'm going to try all the same. It was his first run after a wind op and he did run well up to a point in that race, also the form of the stable was at an all time low.
|
|
By:
An interesting thread although naff all to do with Horseracing at least it has been turned into such!! Have to agree though re-Brigust.......seems to have an agenda,whatever it might be loses me in terms of why the similar argumentative stance on such diverse threads?
Btw whippin where have you seen drying ground forecast? |
|
By:
no real rain forcast for the rest of the week means drying ground unless he waters
|
|
By:
So still soft then Gazo?
|
|
By:
possibly not come friday but does depend on how soft it is tomorrow and if he waters
|
|
By:
No way the watering can will come out imo and odds on no "good" in the description Friday?
|