We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1136 comments are related to the topic:
Biden at 1.06
Biden at 1.06
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,136
|
By:
that's very clear in the rules
|
|
By:
So why haven't they paid out Dave? Ring them and ask
|
|
By:
Interesting story breaking ( Tatum report) confirming a break in at Philadelphia warehouse storing the Dominion voting apparatus where a set of "digital keys" used to access the machine were stolen along with a laptop and nothing else one month before the election
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
A lot of nonsense posted on this thread, possibly with trades in mind.
DT is 24 on here to be next President, he's those odds for a reason  |
|
By:
Andrew/Dave i think you're going to be very surprised when this plays out.
Trump is spending millions of dollars for a reason. He knows he wins if he gets these (alleged) illegal ballots thrown out or declared unconstitutional ONCE it gets to the Supreme Court and out of the controlled state courts where he will likely lose. He is projecting confidence and I don't believe he would do this without some inkling. He is not being a sore loser. He is for real contesting this and believes he has a good case. Perhaps you're right and he is delusional and would go through all this for pure theatre or whatever but I don't believe that is the case. I'm not a layer though i'm rooting for a Trump victory as I think the meltdown would be immense! |
|
By:
He is not being a sore loser. He is for real contesting this and believes he has a good case
 |
|
By:
rofl, he is raising millions claiming that they are for a legal fight, but the small print states that most of the money will go to his campaign. He is simply a con-man.
|
|
By:
Any supreme court case starts in a district court and there have been zero cases claiming fraud filed in these courts. In addition SCOTUS won't hear the kind of idiotic cases being filed by trump.
|
|
By:
lol dave...
I don't think that is fair. He has assembled a crack legal team to challenge the result and specifically the issue of fraudulent postal votes. If they're successful in proving them to be invalid then he has a path to victory once again. Yes, it's a lognshot but you never know. As I say Team Trump seem eerily confident to me. |
|
By:
What a wonderful profession it is to be a lawyer and you can be sure it's a not a "no win-no pay" situation.
|
|
By:
dave,
You need to do some research before posting. I just read this article from (respected) investigative journalist John Solomon. Check it out: A dozen compelling allegations of voting irregularities in 2020 election Copy/paste: https://tinyurl.com/y3qphe2y |
|
By:
They have filed zero claims alleging fraud
FACT the reason they have filed zero claims alleging fraud is that the lawyers filing such claims would face sanctions from the court because they have no proof of electoral fraud. |
|
By:
and lol @ Solomon being respected
|
|
By:
check links and read the affidavits yourself all of this is going to court .
|
|
By:
The only place these affidavits are going is to the FBI next January where perjury charges will follow.
|
|
By:
These mugs think they are helping their hero, but all the nonsense he spouts on twitter disappears when his lawyers are asked questions by the judges.
|
|
By:
Without going too far back in posts,Dave 1357 has 99.9% of bases covered and is 100% spot on in terms of Trump overturning the result,as for the market make your own mind up as to whether Barry Orr deliberately lied or just had a rush of blood to his tiny brain when stating categorically the market would be settled according to electoral vote projections?
Quite simply close the market,settle the obviously winning bets on Biden and move on? Anything else other than those backing Biden to win pennies is simply an advert done on the cheap for BF and imaginary amounts it their account i.e the total shown is probably around 15 times the actual money still in the market,probably more like 30 times? |
|
By:
and as for this
I'm not a layer though i'm rooting for a Trump victory as I think the meltdown would be immense! The resulting civil unrest and possible ceding of multiple states from the USA would not be a matter of mirth. |
|
By:
dave you asked for the evidence I've given you a dozen examples and you just dismiss it and throw your toys out of the pram.
The reason this is is taking time is because they have to prepare the case and go through the system. The goal of course is to take it up to the Supreme Court where they think they will get a fairer hearing as it is mostly Republican. Al gore took 37 days, we're only on say 17? I can't remember |
|
By:
that was one v close state to decide the election - this is no very close states and a landslide
|
|
By:
What "Evidence" punts? Even Trump has not produced a shred yet and in fact been torn to ribbons by his own accusations being proven as fantasy?
|
|
By:
punts, to paraphrase voltaire-trying to reason with these dribblers is like trying to feed medicine to a corpse. Sheep will bleat, it's a sad fact of life, best to spend your energy on more worthwhile endeavours.
|
|
By:
fckewe,log in log out,how long until a reasoned answer or point?
 |
|
By:
"Democracy for Sale: Electronic Voting Machines malfunction CNN 2006 ", go check it out i bet CNN wont be checking or mentioning their coverage from back then ,
Know wonder the Democrat run states were hell bent on buying the product . |
|
By:
he'll be posting a link in Latin next
|
|
By:
or Ancient Greek
|
|
By:
punts
Date Joined: 16 Feb 06 Add contact | Send message 23 Nov 20 14:12 Joined: 16 Feb 06 | Topic/replies: 1,570 | Blogger: punts's blog Betfair "rules" are open to interpretation. Who "projects"? The media? The States? The Supreme Court? thick as pigsh1t and hence a de facto troll |
|
By:
punts
Date Joined: 16 Feb 06 Add contact | Send message 23 Nov 20 15:59 Joined: 16 Feb 06 | Topic/replies: 1,570 | Blogger: punts's blog So why haven't they paid out Dave? Ring them and ask ffs. cos not all states have declared you mug |
|
By:
Do you not wonder Carrot why Trump accused all and sundry of a bent election in 2016 and now asks the same to prove 2020 was the same despite dropping the 2016 claims this year?
|
|
By:
i.e asking the same now to support him..........e.g Fake News?
|
|
By:
Are you having a laugh Charlton i.e "Not all declared"?
|
|
By:
Oh dear.
One of Trumps main mouthpieces Sidney Powell , no longer in favour and has been thrown under the bus. Guiliani also on his way to the bus station as we speak. Trump no longer allowed to use Air Force One. The end is nigh . |
|
By:
Does look over
 It'll be corrupt democratic judges therefor nothing can be done... which totally makes no sense as that is the big reason to carry on and expose it But hey ho |
|
By:
@SontaremStratagem -- not corrupt Democratic judges -- the below is from the judgment of Republican Judge Brann telling the Trumpton plaintiffs they've got no arguments and no evidence.
In this action, the Trump Campaign and the Individual Plaintiffs (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) seek to discard millions of votes legally cast by Pennsylvanians from all corners – from Greene County to Pike County, and everywhere in between. In other words, Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated. One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more. At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Therefore, I grant Defendants’ motions and dismiss Plaintiffs’ action with prejudice. |
|
By:
I love the style. We should all talk like that every day. Life would be much more entertaining. :) ...... bottom line, thank goodness that vile chap is out .... surely the start of mostly better times all round
|
|
By:
flat earth conspiracy imbeciles giving away free money at a never seen before rate
a fool and his money...as they say |
|
By:
Jenna Ellis interview from last night:
- their lawsuit in Pennsylvania is on its way to the Supreme Court. - Based on the 14th Amendment - Re: Sidney Powell - a discussion was had on the best strategy for their client and it was decided for her and RG to focus on election integrity and SP to focus separately on Dominion which is much longer strategy. - They are very much focused on election fraud ie Republican voters being told they cannot vote in person because of a Mail in ballot creates an unacceptable 2 tiered system of justice, ballots being counted in secret, naked ballots arriving without any security envelope etc etc - thousands of pages of evidence in sworn affidavits across 6 states. - A very narrow window before December 14th to get that strategy through. - They only have 3 lawsuits....they will have more in the next few days - Other lawsuits are from people not connected to the campaign. - Their evidence has not been in court as yet. - Pennsylvania 3rd Circuit judge gave his verdict on the merits of evidence without actually seeing any of it. - One particular county in Michigan has a 71% difference across their precincts between their ballot totals and their voter roll totals (I believe this is the 171k dump for Biden she’s referring too where there was no record of who the people were). - When you’re just focused on politics then it’s perceived as pro trump bias but this is about election integrity. *I’m inclined to believe Jenna as she rates highly on the milf scale... |
|
By:
Betfair must love this thread, it's the only thing keeping the market open
On it's way to a Billion pound matched, good marketing/PR for the company. |
|
By:
like a giant whale, he's been harpooned a few times and is slowly rolling over onto his back before he sinks to the ocean floor, hairstylist & milfs in tow
|