|
By:
you are spot on DOUBLED...
|
|
By:
fine here for 2f james....
then simply awful. |
|
By:
Wasn't so bad here that time. Not great, but compared to the final 3f of the previous race there, it was like a dream.
|
|
By:
greenteethnarrabacktroutmoy what your car doing in Newcastle car park golfing? or security consultancy?
![]() |
|
By:
Same $hit, different day, even on middle at Ffos Las
|
|
By:
yep
so much for it being fixed and diff format |
|
By:
same WALOFS avoid here too
|
|
By:
awful here...
|
|
By:
it is so far behind it is untrue
the prices are ludicrous, some one is making a fortune just now |
|
By:
On low latency = very sticky and prices indicate picture delay enough to give someone a mighty edge.
|
|
By:
Didn't see your post james but I agree!
|
|
By:
people are clearly voting with their wallets now james...
very obvious that less folk are playing on these vile pictres from ATR... who can blame them...??? |
|
By:
I spoke to my account manager about it yesterday and he said theres nothing they can do about it - the pictures are provided by sky. They have been in contact with them countless times but they get nowhere (just like we do with bf) and sure sky dont care as its just a bookie benefit channel. I think we're stuck with this filth until something changes at skys end and as we know they have no intention of improving pictures for a betting exchange.
|
|
By:
WALOFS
|
|
By:
the all weather is impossible now with the current state of pictures we have...
southwell / wolves / lingfield forget it... kempton the same and chelmsford is getting that way now for me... whoever has access to faster pictures must think santa claus has come down his chimney on a daily basis... |
|
By:
I think we're stuck with this filth
----------------------------------- no need for the word 'think' Wicklow... same for RTV BLV imv... |
|
By:
Why did the pics at sedgefield yesterday improve from very poor to perfect at one point?
|
|
By:
Why did the pics at sedgefield yesterday improve from very poor to perfect at one point?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- as was stated yesterday... they were slowed down perhaps making it easier to look like something had changed for the better... |
|
By:
Would it be fair to say that betfair like to have a few big winners who pay premium charge.
A level playing field inrunning is no good to them as the profits and losses would be spread across a customer base. that would not allow it to garner a premium charge? |
|
By:
I think the pics improving yesterday was just some sort of fluke. Im sure someone is delibertly sabotaging the feed so maybe yesterday he had to go and walk his dog? If they work occasionally albeit more delayed than before then its possible. But for sure someone is at it and all they going to do is kill the inrunning for those tracks.
|
|
By:
I've seen the horses at the start in non-stutter mode but when the tape goes up it's uncanny how stuttery the race becomes.........uncanny
|
|
By:
A level playing field inrunning is no good to them as the profits and losses would be spread across a customer base. that would not allow it to garner a premium charge?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- the way it's going all they will have playing in running is folk at the track (whoever they are) / drone and facetimers and folk getting access to a faster stream (whoever they are)... folk sat at home doing the right thing playing off BLV or ch426 pics are slowly but surely being given no chance to compete... |
|
By:
fos las smooth?
|
|
By:
greenteethnarrabacktroutmoy 07 Oct 20 15:36
if you recoed a 10 sec sample of the blv and run it through a rainbow table you'll see the hash values have changed..hence the difference. Jumping-cuckoo-monk 08 Oct 20 13:00 Why did the pics at sedgefield yesterday improve from very poor to perfect at one point? i explained yesterday why above ^ |
|
By:
and if that scenario continues then in running will simply die naturally...
it's very nearly on a life support machine NOW imv... |
|
By:
I recall you saying green but tbh I didn't understand what you were saying
Too techy for me. |
|
By:
Are you saying green that someone just basically tweaked the feed?
|
|
By:
what pics are you using for sky tracks these days greenie?...surely you aint using lv
|
|
By:
ffos las awful again...
|
|
By:
aye it went **** again after being smooth for about 10 secs here
|
|
By:
ffos las on mimnimum was fine for first 2 hurdles then became unplayable, so switched to low latency and that was unplayable too.
|
|
By:
ok on low here
|
|
By:
Im guessing Greenteeth is using this feed - would you tell us how far ahead it is compared to the rubbish vid?
Eutelsat 7B - 7C (7.0°E) Frequency: 11178 - Pol: V - SR: 3674 - FEC: - Category: Sport - Courses hippiques Transmitted in: MPEG-4 Info: Sky Sports Racing |
|
By:
that feeds on everyday, roughly 2 seconds BEHIND betfair video
|
|
By:
ahead of bf video for french racing tho
|
|
By:
really? jessus even the satelite feeds are getting slower - but theres players with proper live ish pictures - what are they using?
|
|
By:
bar the odd irish meet theres no satt feeds available for uk racing as far as i know
|
|
By:
bang goes the GPS in running theory...
Minella Theory first past the post (without jockey)... so why did it not get belted down from 1000 to 1.01...???? nonsense. |
|
By:
Minella Mojo..
apologies. |
|
By:
what about facetime just now system?
|