There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 635 comments are related to the topic:
lv
lv
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 635
|
By:
oi oi
over to purple it is |
|
By:
newbury blv is 0.5 behind ruk on buffer 1
|
|
By:
looked about 0.5 seconds behind daq pictures which are still on flash (using lowest latency)
|
|
By:
you have got to be kidding
bf using slow pics for their customers while those who barely offer IR offer quicker pics? |
|
By:
jamesdean am at least 2 seconds in front of live on my FT feed
 |
|
By:
atr blv has lost 1.5 seconds...now 2.5 behind live.
newbury blv is 0.5 behind ruk on buffer 1 will try on daq now |
|
By:
atr blv has lost 1.5 seconds...now 2.5 behind live.
newbury blv is 0.5 behind ruk on buffer 1 daq 1 sec behind live. |
|
By:
Delay isnt too bad, could do without the stuttering though
|
|
By:
this is really weird
cos both lingfield suspends at begging and at the end were well after stalls had opend/race had ended So either they are acting in concert to the new slower speeds (ie leaving markets late) Or these pics arnt slow |
|
By:
Gives a pm then stayinin, I'll take a nosey
 |
|
By:
beggining
|
|
By:
thought the same dusty
|
|
By:
WS
Use Chrome Click the stopwatch icon select Lowest Compare to ft and report back pls |
|
By:
so,if bf are susp on the slow pic it will be a goldmine clicking near the line...
 |
|
By:
-2.5 gray.
|
|
By:
(behind track)
|
|
By:
deffo used chrome tho havnt you cos firefox doesnt allow lowest latency
|
|
By:
Agree with Willie
|
|
By:
earlier steve, they were starting and stopping closer to live, so with SA they suspended before they even reached the line, i'm not sure what they are watching but it's not the same as what they stick on here
|
|
By:
dustybin
28 Feb 20 14:31 Joined: 29 Dec 08 | Topic/replies: 17,467 | Blogger: dustybin's blog deffo used chrome tho havnt you cos firefox doesnt allow lowest latency yes it does ? |
|
By:
I think there was maybe 4-5 secs delay on the pics over normal , first race at donny i had about a 2 sec diff between bf and daq
|
|
By:
sorry I meant Edge doesnt
|
|
By:
How does chrome blv on minimum compare to **** lv that's still using flash???
|
|
By:
d...a..q
|
|
By:
this race ive got maybe 1.5 secs diff
|
|
By:
ta elise
have daq on it's asking to install flash yet already have it installed?? |
|
By:
Sticky Donny but not Ling here, odd.
|
|
By:
bf you are fecking gash
|
|
By:
I've got BF on chrome on lowest and daq on next to each other and daq is very slightly ahead, like 0.1 or 0.2 seconds
|
|
By:
DMS is yur D aq on fastest too?
|
|
By:
Have bet daq lv and betfair lv exact same
|
|
By:
have daq on it's asking to install flash yet already have it installed??
its designed to ask every time. |
|
By:
dusty, where is the setting on daq for fastest?
theyre identical here but canny see a daq speed setting |
|
By:
james,is today your 1st day?
|
|
By:
I dont have d q
I just assumed it had the latency like flash bf used to have |
|
By:
How does chrome blv on minimum compare to **** lv that's still using flash???
chrome minumum on betfair is about 0.5 - 0.8 behind daq |
|
By:
It's my first day on this new lv shafter aye
|
|
By:
f uckin brilliant
everyone saying different speeds normal f uckin c0ck up WD bf |
|
By:
cheers pab
|
|
By:
To save me reading the whole thread have the Live Vids now lost another 1 to 1.5 secs to live on the ATR tracks. Daq is slightly ahead of BF vid but only 4 secs to ATr when it used to be just over 5 secs.
364's pics are now 2 to 3 seconds behind ATR. |