There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 82
|
By:
where's the photo betting ffs
|
|
By:
indeed tom
|
|
By:
£683,000 matched and no photo betting
|
|
By:
if there was would they open it, clueless c****
|
|
By:
defo a big bump 50 yds from line
|
|
By:
Betfair asleep again.
|
|
By:
ITS THERE,, LOOK
|
|
By:
ding dongy
|
|
By:
gets it
|
|
By:
wd delty
|
|
By:
who's this lad deciding the stewrads before he seen it
|
|
By:
i wanted photo betting willie
 |
|
By:
ruk clueless, pundit reckons fav was hampered....look how far they came across ffs
|
|
By:
winner disq imo
|
|
By:
RUK
sigh, just sigh! |
|
By:
hope so im on the 2nd
|
|
By:
when these two see the prices
 |
|
By:
gone for me
|
|
By:
No photo betting though which was a pain.
|
|
By:
RUK Pundits say No Way
I think they are wrong |
|
By:
winner has deffo nudged 2nd and caused it to be unbalanced...
|
|
By:
Winner should go because Fuente caused interference and the winning margin is a nose. Ben Fearnley appears to have backed Fuente.
|
|
By:
not enough there to disqualify imo
|
|
By:
Most ridiculous analysis I've ever heard here by RUK ....and that's saying something.
|
|
By:
agree with shafty
|
|
By:
Winner interfered and jockey on 2nd couldn’t use his whip hand...
|
|
By:
yeah fearnley talking sh1te
|
|
By:
shd get it but very tight
|
|
By:
very bad analysis i agree entirely
|
|
By:
totally agree Duffy laughable stuff
|
|
By:
The trouble with getting Timeform apprentices to talk knowledgeably about racing is that they are still green behind the ears and haven't got a clue.
|
|
By:
Tricky call. Did the second get to the front after the nudge only for fav to get back up? Does that matter?
|
|
By:
Should be a stewards into that 3rd place call !!
|
|
By:
2ND clearly knocked off balance....beaten a nose....jockey can also point to the point I/R where his horses was coming past the winner before the bump.
|
|
By:
winning distance a nose
reversed imo |
|
By:
The most straightforward throw out ever?
|
|
By:
has the winner caused interference? yes has it caused 2nd to lose ,ore ground that it was beaten? well it deffo got unbalance so imo yes.
but im not deciding their fate. |
|
By:
the bloke on ruk says fuente came over and interfered with the second and got the worst of it, so should still keep it hahaha get shot of this pillock
|
|
By:
All the stewards have to do decide is did the winner cause more interference to the 2nd than it was beaten by. In this case basically that means if it caused any interference at all it should go. You do not take into account whether the winner lost any momentum as it's the one which caused the interference.
|