Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
.
Show More
ruk clueless, pundit reckons fav was hampered....look how far they came across ffs
winner has deffo nudged 2nd and caused it to be unbalanced...
Winner should go because Fuente caused interference and the winning margin is a nose. Ben Fearnley appears to have backed Fuente.
Most ridiculous analysis I've ever heard here by RUK ....and that's saying something.
Winner interfered and jockey on 2nd couldn’t use his whip hand...
The trouble with getting Timeform apprentices to talk knowledgeably about racing is that they are still green behind the ears and haven't got a clue.
Tricky call. Did the second get to the front after the nudge only for fav to get back up? Does that matter?
Should be a stewards into that 3rd place call !!
2ND clearly knocked off balance....beaten a nose....jockey can also point to the point I/R where his horses was coming past the winner before the bump.
has the winner caused interference? yes has it caused 2nd to lose ,ore ground that it was beaten? well it deffo got unbalance so imo yes.
but im not deciding their fate.
but im not deciding their fate.
the bloke on ruk says fuente came over and interfered with the second and got the worst of it, so should still keep it hahaha get shot of this pillock
All the stewards have to do decide is did the winner cause more interference to the 2nd than it was beaten by. In this case basically that means if it caused any interference at all it should go. You do not take into account whether the winner lost any momentum as it's the one which caused the interference.
sporting life result page no mention of stewards and 365 settled already?
wonder what the prices would have been in the photo? Well played Betfair you're even costing the sport money.
Ive layed it in the 4 place market will it get DQ or placed in second?
get that t1t off the telly, woeful even after he'd seen the h/o
quite right betfair ,, stop the in running, photo betting,, and enquiry betting , and your site will be much more attractive to new customers
Yes the retard on TV should be sent packing immediately.
If that isnt gross incompetance I dont know what is.
The Racing Bernie Madoff `Guaranteed to make you lose money'.
If that isnt gross incompetance I dont know what is.
The Racing Bernie Madoff `Guaranteed to make you lose money'.
Correct decision. Can only think the plonker on commentary backed Fuente.
Aug 20, 2018 -- 2:50PM, tomhunt wrote:
get that t1t off the telly, woeful even after he'd seen the h/o
Couldn't believe what I was hearing, saying the fav was more inconvenienced. A total buffoon.
tom, not only were they useless having watched the replay - they were blissfully unaware until the bing bong - when you could see it bumped in real time -
cudnt split the still on line so that would have been a guess..would have been both around evens..
bad day at the office for them two on ruk absolutely clueless
Totally agree with Charles the commentator was talking nonsense must have backed the fav
really willie? I expected the FPTP to be short as even the RUK lads were calling it if i remember
it's bizarre from the pundits because they normally hype a reversal for the "drama"
niall's in a hole and digging, he's having a shocker aye
defo backed it, 'fuente lost a shoe was that taken into consideration'......steward: NO!
he should have said he lost money was that taken into consideration
'The first past the post lost a shoe. Would that be taken into account in the inquiry'. Perhaps the most ridiculous comment an RUK presenter has ever uttered.
the 2 on track and the Goth should be suspended.
They are agast at the decision. Utter rancid fools the lot of them.
They are agast at the decision. Utter rancid fools the lot of them.
"he should have said he lost money was that taken into consideration"
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539