Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
URADEL - Winner - 7:40 Galway ...
28Apr18
Pun HcH 53K
2m4f Y/Sft —
Non Runner (stiff)
— — — — —
17Apr18
Fai HcH 53K 2m Sft 10-11 7/19 btn 14½L Low Sun 9-9 4/1F P Townend 132 115 131
51 days break
25Feb18
Naa NvH 9K 2m3f Sft 11-10 1/6 by 7L Best Behavior 11-4 14/1 D E Mullins 123 77 138
265 days break
05Jun17
Lis MdH 7K 2m Y 11-12 1/17 by nse Monarch 11-5 12/1 R Walsh — 107 122
876 days break
28Apr18
Pun HcH 53K
2m4f Y/Sft —
Non Runner (stiff)
— — — — —
17Apr18
Fai HcH 53K 2m Sft 10-11 7/19 btn 14½L Low Sun 9-9 4/1F P Townend 132 115 131
51 days break
25Feb18
Naa NvH 9K 2m3f Sft 11-10 1/6 by 7L Best Behavior 11-4 14/1 D E Mullins 123 77 138
265 days break
05Jun17
Lis MdH 7K 2m Y 11-12 1/17 by nse Monarch 11-5 12/1 R Walsh — 107 122
876 days break
Show More
He was probably clue less to how it would run , nothing clever in that , just very suspect ,imo
If they were clueless as to how it would run then why is it suspect?
" some training feat " my ass lol , they will have backed it ! , would not have been ridden to win like it was ,
You don`t back a horse to win then put another up to beat it , lol , suspect imo
What on earth has - "they will have backed it," - got to do with, " some training feat " my ass"?
An Entirely illogical outburst.
Of course they backed it - it was AIMED specifically at the race - Why? - Because ...
The Winning OWNER's SON RODE it - and the same Father and Son won this SAME race last year.
An Entirely illogical outburst.
Of course they backed it - it was AIMED specifically at the race - Why? - Because ...
The Winning OWNER's SON RODE it - and the same Father and Son won this SAME race last year.
Sorry , my paper had down the same trainer for the winner , and the second ! , did not realise they were different trainers ,
Your sarcasm does not become you.
We are well aware that Mullins trains BOTH ... and, at an educated guess ... You backed the other one.
We are well aware that Mullins trains BOTH ... and, at an educated guess ... You backed the other one.
I think he also trained the second fav , beaten about 60 lenghts ? All i am implying that if it was a great training feat as you suggest , did said trainer have much of a clue about how each horse would run as reflected in the betting ? thats all , You might think that a trainer might have a better idea of how his horses may run ? imo , And no i did not back the other one , but by the betting i assume alot of other punters did , it`s just an opinion
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539