Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
onlooker
30 Jul 18 19:48
Joined:
Date Joined: 18 Feb 03
| Topic/replies: 40,642 | Blogger: onlooker's blog
URADEL  -  Winner - 7:40 Galway ...

28Apr18
    Pun HcH 53K
    2m4f    Y/Sft    —   
Non Runner (stiff)
    —    —    —    —    —
17Apr18
    Fai HcH 53K    2m    Sft    10-11    7/19 btn 14½L Low Sun 9-9    4/1F    P Townend    132    115    131
51 days break
25Feb18
    Naa NvH 9K    2m3f    Sft    11-10    1/6 by 7L Best Behavior 11-4    14/1    D E Mullins    123    77    138
265 days break
05Jun17
    Lis MdH 7K    2m    Y    11-12    1/17 by nse Monarch 11-5    12/1    R Walsh    —    107    122
876 days break

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 8
By:
jinxy
When: 30 Jul 18 19:55
He was probably clue less to how it would run , nothing clever in that , just very suspect ,imo
By:
sparrow
When: 30 Jul 18 19:57
If they were clueless as to how it would run then why is it suspect?
By:
jinxy
When: 30 Jul 18 19:59
" some training feat " my ass lol , they will have backed it ! , would not have been ridden to win like it was ,
By:
jinxy
When: 30 Jul 18 20:01
You don`t back a horse to win then put another up to beat it , lol , suspect imo
By:
onlooker
When: 30 Jul 18 20:05
What on earth has - "they will have backed it," - got to do with, " some training feat " my ass"?

An Entirely illogical outburst.

Of course they backed it - it was AIMED specifically at the race -  Why? - Because ...

The Winning OWNER's SON RODE  it - and the same Father and Son won this SAME race last year.
By:
jinxy
When: 30 Jul 18 20:44
Sorry , my paper had  down the same trainer for the winner  ,  and the  second  ! , did not realise they were different trainers ,
By:
onlooker
When: 30 Jul 18 20:52
Your sarcasm does not become you.

We are well aware that Mullins trains BOTH  ... and, at an educated guess ... You backed the other one.
By:
jinxy
When: 30 Jul 18 20:59
I think he also trained the second fav , beaten about 60 lenghts ? All i am implying that if it was a great training feat as you suggest , did said trainer have much of a clue about how each horse would run as reflected in the betting ? thats all , You might think that a trainer might have a better idea of how his horses may run ? imo , And no i did not back the other one , but by the betting i assume alot of other punters did , it`s just an opinion
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com