If u had started laying favs just a week ago you could now retire - however not guaranteed. I know someone who claims to make a living laying odds-on pokes for a place.
If u had started laying favs just a week ago you could now retire - however not guaranteed. I know someone who claims to make a living laying odds-on pokes for a place.
I'm sure it isn't as easy or as straightforward as I make it sound hence I wondered if there is a method to do so which @posy and @ihal essex suggest there is.
Does betting software such as Bet Angel allow you to lay all horses at set parameters?
I'm sure it isn't as easy or as straightforward as I make it sound hence I wondered if there is a method to do so which @posy and @ihal essex suggest there is. Does betting software such as Bet Angel allow you to lay all horses at set parameters?
I know there isn't any holy grail which is why we look for alternatives. In fact, if we were all laying there'd be no betting. Just seems that so many favs lose there must be a method to gain advantage from this.
I know there isn't any holy grail which is why we look for alternatives. In fact, if we were all laying there'd be no betting. Just seems that so many favs lose there must be a method to gain advantage from this.
@xmoneyx The reason I looked at this was because I subscribed to a Tip service and most of the so called tips have lost hence made me wish I'd laid them instead!!
@xmoneyx The reason I looked at this was because I subscribed to a Tip service and most of the so called tips have lost hence made me wish I'd laid them instead!!
@roida I had seen that stat previously and, again, it heightened my interest in exploring whether it would be better to lay horses but as some have mentioned here it is clear that you would have to lay under certain parameters. I appreciate that many of the forum members here are seasoned betters and have explored many systems to find one that profits.
@roida I had seen that stat previously and, again, it heightened my interest in exploring whether it would be better to lay horses but as some have mentioned here it is clear that you would have to lay under certain parameters. I appreciate that many
If it used to be 33% in years gone by and now it is more like 35%, then perhaps there is a bit of 'modern myth' about the consistency of this percentage. I've heard smaller fields may be responsible for a rise in the number of favs winning.
This 33% intrigues me, always has done - if anyone has a mathematical explanation, I'd be pleased to hear it.Incidentally it's not 33% but it's thereabouts.Here are the stats for GB and Ireland clear SP favs since 2012:-2016 34.52015 35.142014 35.852
On any given day there will many favourites that lose so why not just lay them?
Guaranteed profits with this system...start laying the favs that lose and you will never look back #easystreet #peaceofpi$$
On any given day there will many favourites that lose so why not just lay them?Guaranteed profits with this system...start laying the favs that lose and you will never look back #easystreet #peaceofpi$$
I purchased a laying fave system on ebay for £19.99. Great write ups loads of comments from satisfied customers. Really professional listing. The result? First 7 lays all won any my betfair account was empty.
I purchased a laying fave system on ebay for £19.99. Great write ups loads of comments from satisfied customers. Really professional listing. The result? First 7 lays all won any my betfair account was empty.
jackboo 14 Sep 16 10:19 dont lay faves in group races , and no bigger than 4.1 , you will be ok on turf only , dont lay on the a/w , plus dont lay over the jumps
I'd like some reasoning/evidence behind this please
jackboo 14 Sep 16 10:19 dont lay faves in group races , and no bigger than 4.1 , you will be ok on turf only , dont lay on the a/w , plus dont lay over the jumpsI'd like some reasoning/evidence behind this please
National Hunt, Flat and Aw have exactly the same A/E number of winners for favs which equates to 0.93.
Turf Group races have an A/E of 0.92
Turf class 2's the A/E is less at 0.89
Class 5 favs have the strongest A/E at 0.97 and class 6's 0.93
There's no evidence that laying favs in group races puts you at more of a disadvantage.
As someone mentioned earlier there's no reason to see favs as unique just for being a fav rather than just another horse which you are trying to identify as good or bad at the price. you are either a good judge of a horse in a given race or not over time and applying as many filters as you want just won't change this.
National Hunt, Flat and Aw have exactly the same A/E number of winners for favs which equates to 0.93.Turf Group races have an A/E of 0.92Turf class 2's the A/E is less at 0.89Class 5 favs have the strongest A/E at 0.97 and class 6's 0.93There's no e
A young lass on the forum named Moffitt Believed that laying a fav brought a profit To be angst and despair Her bank was paid bare And she's now tipping favs as The Prophet
A young lass on the forum named MoffittBelieved that laying a fav brought a profitTo be angst and despairHer bank was paid bareAnd she's now tipping favs as The Prophet