There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 79 comments are related to the topic:
RUK HD
RUK HD
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 79
|
By:
Duffy, it may have something to do with the fact Ruk pictures are occasionally seen on track a full second in front of the ones we receive at home.
So maybe theyve a lot more speed to play with than people think. Ive had sd and hd up against each other and hd is around 0.15 sec quicker, its noticable sd hasnt slowed from last week eaither |
|
By:
TRD, given inplay betting is now massive in football, cricket, tennis etc with much of the next generation choosing those sports and rejecting racing because of the lack of a level playing field, dont you think this puts the future of racing in doubt? that should be of concern to all
You are aware those sports are all much further behind live than atr pics even? The only difference is that people either aren't aware or don't care that it isn't a level playing field! |
|
By:
Duffy, it may have something to do with the fact Ruk pictures are occasionally seen on track a full second in front of the ones we receive at home.
bollox |
|
By:
Absolutely true Roida
|
|
By:
I said occasionally, and I mean occasionally.
|
|
By:
And if you think its bollox you need to ask around because for once youre not in the full picture
|
|
By:
spkyer, 7 seconds in racing can hardly be equated to even 30+ seconds in football wrt ir odds changes, i thought this was obvious but try taking a look at the graphs
|
|
By:
i go to tracks tt...the track ruk was slightly in front of sky ruk..not 1 sec.
|
|
By:
Check it against Turf next time you see it, I personally think its closer to a second.
I think if it can be produced and passed out that quick on a sky platform then it should be. Ive just no idea if the track picture feed of the quicker ruk is distributed that way. |
|
By:
Ive had sd and hd up against each other and hd is around 0.15 sec quicker, its noticable
same...and quickest than RUK has been for weeks |
|
By:
delete than
|
|
By:
What you going by to suggest it's the quickest its been dunc?
|
|
By:
spkyer, 7 seconds in racing can hardly be equated to even 30+ seconds in football wrt ir odds changes, i thought this was obvious but try taking a look at the graphs
Eh? So you are now saying that you (and others) know the other sports are a long way behind but it doesn't really matter? Now where's that quote about '1 second to score a goal' I wonder.......... |
|
By:
the new superb picture is doing the irish boy no favours on my tv.
looks ready for his coffin. as an aside, the hd picture is fat better than the one i get on sky, and even better than bt sport in hd |
|
By:
thurnscoe thunder
07 Mar 16 16:40 Joined: 25 Nov 00 , its noticable sd hasnt slowed from last week eaither __ the suggestion is that ruk has been slowed slightly weeks ago so that when HD comes on line this week they are both the same speed |
|
By:
the volume on the ruk hd channel is very loud as well.
when i switch back to atr the difference is incredible. |
|
By:
Leave me out of it !
|
|
By:
ATR have launched E.L.Q in retaliation to RUK's move. ELQ = extreme low quality.
|
|
By:
its all go
|
|
By:
I'm still having nightmares about Don Macleans adams apple
 |
|
By:
Great picture quality for me.
|
|
By:
Me too. I didn't think I had a HD subscription,,,
|
|
By:
Obvious which the upscaled pic meetings are like Kempton last night, apparently 82% of meeting this year in HD. Still huge difference in quality switching to atr
|
|
By:
Yeah the picture and sound quality are great. So far I haven't noticed anything in regards to delay issues. It's faster than the SD channel but is it still fast enough to compete with track-siders? So far so good.
|
|
By:
Pardon my lack of knowledge but is HD only available on SKY, i have virgin pictures(536)and dont think i have HD.
|
|
By:
beccaboo • March 10, 2016 1:53 PM GMT
Pardon my lack of knowledge but is HD only available on SKY, i have virgin pictures(536)and dont think i have HD. You are correct HD is not available on Virgin ,they hope to have it some time in the future. |
|
By:
Is HD still infront of SD? and by how far?
|
|
By:
It was on Tuesday, not too sure today.
|
|
By:
How did you time it incred?
|
|
By:
Very inaccurately JD,
 . I just switched between the channels and watched the timer. HD was in front but by less than half a second. I've just done the same again and 432 seems ever so slightly faster than 466. |
|
By:
Thanks incredd
|
|
By:
lcredd 10 Mar 16 13:45
Yeah the picture and sound quality are great. So far I haven't noticed anything in regards to delay issues. It's faster than the SD channel but is it still fast enough to compete with track-siders? So far so good. sd and hd identical in our office. |
|
By:
tv's side by side roida?
|
|
By:
Thanks Roida. It must just be wishful thinking that HD was in front. Does anyone know if there's any truth on the subject that RUK were slowing down SD to make it the same speed as HD? Surely we'd have noticed by getting our asses kicked in-running.
|
|
By:
jamesdean 10 Mar 16 15:26
tv's side by side roida? yes..both on sky hd but 1 tele is hd |
|
By:
at newcastle on tues blv was 3 secs behind track..sis -3.5
|
|
By:
ta
|
|
By:
Would any one be kind enough to tell me how far behind HD is to realtime (google live time) or track, cheers
|
|
By:
i'd say around 1.7 sec
|
|
By:
thanks
|