About 5 years ago I complained that the reduction factors here were wrong ,and I was asked if I would help to come up with a better solution along with some others wanting the same thing. I said I would assist ,but 5 years later still haven't heard anything .Just about sums Betfair up.
About 5 years ago I complained that the reduction factors here were wrong ,and I was asked if I would helpto come up with a better solution along with some others wanting the same thing. I said I would assist ,but 5 years later still haven't heard an
I find it worse though when ( not in this case) it affects the place market. You can back a horse to finish in the three, say one is withdrawn late on, your horse wins or finishes second. The withdrawn horse would only have REALLY have affected the third place runner but you still get a reduced return!
I find it worse though when ( not in this case) it affects the place market. You can back a horse to finish in the three, say one is withdrawn late on, your horse wins or finishes second. The withdrawn horse would only have REALLY have affected the
I had exactly the same Blunder. They are blatanty wrong but no one in betfair seems to care! When one is pulled out especially against a short favourite it becomes a minefield.
I had exactly the same Blunder. They are blatanty wrong but no one in betfair seems to care! When one is pulled out especially against a short favourite it becomes a minefield.
It shouldn't be changed to favour the backers ,it should be altered to be a fairer result for both,than is currently the case.Using Rule 4 as your guide is a non starter,that works for a different model.
It shouldn't be changed to favour the backers ,it should be altered to be a fairer result for both,than is currently the case.UsingRule 4 as your guide is a non starter,that works for a different model.