There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
fooking bast like fooking banks
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 10
|
By:
The "reduction charge" on here is a disgrace.
|
|
By:
my 1.42 returned 1.23, at least Dick Turpin wore a mask
 |
|
By:
The layers wont be complaining that's for sure
|
|
By:
Would happily settle for 10p in the £ deduction
My BF winnings reduced (decimated more accurately) from £135 to £83.07. |
|
By:
About 5 years ago I complained that the reduction factors here were wrong ,and I was asked if I would help
to come up with a better solution along with some others wanting the same thing. I said I would assist ,but 5 years later still haven't heard anything .Just about sums Betfair up. |
|
By:
I find it worse though when ( not in this case) it affects the place market. You can back a horse to finish in the three, say one is withdrawn late on, your horse wins or finishes second. The withdrawn horse would only have REALLY have affected the third place runner but you still get a reduced return!
|
|
By:
I had exactly the same Blunder. They are blatanty wrong but no one in betfair seems to care! When one is pulled out especially against a short favourite it becomes a minefield.
|
|
By:
The layers on here would be up in arms if they changed it to suit the backers.
|
|
By:
It shouldn't be changed to favour the backers ,it should be altered to be a fairer result for both,than is currently the case.Using
Rule 4 as your guide is a non starter,that works for a different model. |
|
By:
Could have been worse - Betfred's Tote paid a jaw-dropping win dividend of 1.1
|