By Olivia Goldhill3:50PM BST 04 Sep 2014Olivia Goldhill
Comments14 Comments
“People think that miscarriages of justice are rare and exceptional,” says Dr Michael Naughton, founder of the UK Innocence Project. “But every single day, people are overturning convictions for criminal offences. Miscarriages of justice are routine, even mundane features of the criminal justice system. They are systemic.”
On Wednesday, two men were released from prison in North Carolina after DNA evidence overturned their convictions for rape and murder. Similar miscarriages of justice could happen in Britain – and have done, surprisingly recently.
As recently as last year, there were innocent men inside Britain's prisons - as these high-profile cases that were eventually ruled as wrongful convictions show.
Victor Nealon
Convicted: 1997
Related Articles
Half-brothers freed after 30 years for rape and murder 03 Sep 2014
Man spotted weeping next to body of murdered horsewoman 04 Sep 2014
Parents reunited with five-year-old Ashya King, but fight goes on 03 Sep 2014
Your case or mine? The crimes we must solve for ourselves 05 Sep 2014
Time served: 17 years
Released: 2013
Nealon spent 17 years in prison for attempted sexual assault – though police officers never carried out DNA testing on the victim’s clothing. At his trial in 1997, the court was told that no DNA evidence was available. But privately funded DNA tests discovered that the victim’s clothes had been kept sealed and untested. In fact, the garments did contain DNA samples - from a man who wasn’t Nealon. The Criminal Cases Review Commission refused to investigate the evidence twice, and only carried out a review at Nealon’s third appeal. When Nealon was released in December 2013, he was given just £46 discharge money and spent his first night of freedom on the streets. This June, the Ministry of Justice ruled that Nealon would not get compensation for his 17 years behind bars.
Sam Hallam
Convicted: 2005
Time served: Seven years
Released: 2012
Hallam was 18 when he received a life sentence for the death of trainee chef Essayas Kassahun, but judges were told that Hallam was the victim of a “serious miscarriage of justice” when his conviction was quashed in 2012. Evidence from Hallam’s mobile phone showed he was not at the crime scene, and judges found that, for “reasons that escape us”, his phone was not investigated by the police. Hallam also suffered the loss of his father, who committed suicide when Hallam was sent to prison. “He’s never going to get over his miscarriage of justice,” says Dr Naughton.

Sam Hallam leaves the Court of Appeal with his mother Wendy and surrounded by jubilant friends
Barry George
Convicted: 2001
Time served: Eight years
Released: 2008
George was convicted of the murder of television presenter Jill Dando and was released after two trials and two appeals. His sentence was finally overturned after scientific evidence was ruled inadmissible by the trial judge. He was denied compensation and is taking his claim to the European Court of Human Rights.

Barry George spent eight years in prison after being wrongly convicted of the murder of TV presenter Jill Dando
Sally Clark
Convicted: 1999
Time served: Three years
Released: 2003
Clark was wrongfully sentenced to life in prison for the deaths of one young son in 1996, and another, a two-month old, in 1998. She was released after three years in jail after an expert witness, Professor Roy Meadow, was discredited. Meadow wrote in his book that “one sudden infant death is a tragedy, two is suspicious and three is murder, unless proven otherwise”. He claimed in court that there is a one in 73 million chance of two cot deaths in a wealthy family, but the Royal Statistical Society said there was no basis for this claim. Following her release, other cases that relied on evidence from Meadow were re-examined, and another mother, Angela Cannings, also had her conviction for murder overturned. But Clark never recovered from her imprisonment and became an alcoholic. She died of alcohol poisoning in 2007.

As she left the High Court in 2003, Sally Clark said: 'There are no winners here.'
Paul Blackburn
Convicted: 1978
Time served: 25 years
Released: 2003
Blackburn spent a quarter of a century in prison after he was convicted, aged 15, for the sexual assault and attempted murder of a nine-year-old boy. The prosecution depended on a confession by Blackburn that was written after four hours of police interrogation. In 2005, appeal judges found that police “did not tell the truth” when they said that the confession was offered freely and in Blackburn’s own words. Blackburn says the statement was dictated to him, and expert testimony found it unlikely that a badly educated 15-year-old could have spelled so many technical terms correctly. The appeal court ruled that Blackburn’s confession should never have been considered evidence.

Asked if he could return to a normal life, Paul Blackburn said: "I don't know. What is a normal life after 25 years in there?'
Are innocent men still in prison today?
Miscarriages of justice will continue, says Dr Naughton, as long as our criminal justice system relies on unreliable forms of evidence, such as theories from expert witnesses, eyewitness identification and circumstantial evidence – all of which have been scientifically undermined.
Even DNA evidence can be discredited, due to problems with partial samples, mixed samples and “innocent transference". Dr Naughton explains that if two people shake hands, each will contain a trace of the other’s DNA. “I can then go into a pub that you’ve never been in or pick up a gun that you’ve never touched. I can shoot somebody with that gun and your DNA will be on that gun because I’ve transferred it. The public doesn’t know these things,” says Dr Naughton.
And cases such as Blackburn reveal the problems with “parole deal” sentencing. Prisoners applying for parole are more likely to be released if they complete courses to show that they’ve reduced their risk of re-offending. Those that won’t admit their guilt and refuse to do so can end up with longer sentences than if they’d pleaded guilty, says Dr Naughton. “They end up in this limbo situation. We call it the parole deal, where prisoners maintaining innocence are trapped in prison,” he adds.
One of the most high profile criminals who maintains his innocence today has been continually denied parole in part because he insists he is innocent. Raymond Gilbert was convicted of murder in 1981 and could have been released from prison in 1996 if he’d plead guilty. Instead, he is still in prison 33 years later.
Dr Naughton claims that the presumption of innocence leaves those accused of crime vulnerable to wrongful convictions because fewer resources are allocated to the defence team. Instead, the prosecution and police are well funded to chip away at the presumed innocent status.
He also makes a distinction between miscarriages of justice and “abortions of justice”, where police actively undermine a fair trial. The Criminal Cases Review Commission was founded in response to just such a case, after police manufactured evidence against the Guilford Four and the Birmingham Six, who were accused of IRA bombings.
“There was a real crisis of confidence in the criminal justice system when those cases were revealed to be wrongful convictions,” says Dr Naughton.
Today, Britain’s justice system is respected as a fair judge of criminal activity. But no system can be perfect and, as the history of miscarriages of justice shows, innocent people continue to spend time in prison.
* Dr Michael Naughton, senior lecturer at the University of Bristol, is the founder and director of the University of Bristol Innocence Project.
       
449
       
219
       
0
       
59
       
727
   
Emai

Miscarriages of justice will continue, says Dr Naughton, as long as our criminal justice system relies on unreliable forms of evidence, such as theories from expert witnesses, eyewitness identification and circumstantial evidence – all of which have been scientifically undermined.
Even DNA evidence can be discredited, due to problems with partial samples, mixed samples and “innocent transference". Dr Naughton explains that if two people shake hands, each will contain a trace of the other’s DNA. “I can then go into a pub that you’ve never been in or pick up a gun that you’ve never touched. I can shoot somebody with that gun and your DNA will be on that gun because I’ve transferred it. The public doesn’t know these things,” says Dr Naughton.
And cases such as Blackburn reveal the problems with “parole deal” sentencing. Prisoners applying for parole are more likely to be released if they complete courses to show that they’ve reduced their risk of re-offending. Those that won’t admit their guilt and refuse to do so can end up with longer sentences than if they’d pleaded guilty, says Dr Naughton. “They end up in this limbo situation. We call it the parole deal, where prisoners maintaining innocence are trapped in prison,” he adds.
One of the most high profile criminals who maintains his innocence today has been continually denied parole in part because he insists he is innocent. Raymond Gilbert was convicted of murder in 1981 and could have been released from prison in 1996 if he’d plead guilty. Instead, he is still in prison 33 years later.!!!

Unfortunately in this country there are thousands of rape convictions.  In the eyes of the law they should face the same punishment.  However most serve their time and can live a live of anonymity.  They are free to restart their live and get a job (assuming there are no safeguarding concerns) and their employee agrees.   Evans had this opportunity but has been hounded out by the masses/media and mob.  Irrespective of the decision on this employment, his trial has been in the public domain, and for the rest of his life he will be accused, abused and vilified. 

For me this is the ultimate price he will pay, and very different from your average rapist (is there is such a thing!)

Everyone deserves a second chance...just my view

This circus just gets dafter and dafter.
Now offence is taken because Hillsborough was mentioned as part of an analogy.
They have completely taken his words out of context, he was talking about the principle of how things have been wrong in the past and later proven to be.

Soon we will have to have a written apology as part of any statement made to the media.
Maybe district of Hillsborough will have to be re-named so any future mention of the area doesn't cause offence somehow.

The lesson here unfortunately is to look after yourself and let the rest of society self destruct into stupidity.

The internet/social media has made the chattering classes' redundant !



They're all Jimmy the Judge's NOW !

I agree Doc. There is no better way. You know as well as I do though, along with any rational minded person, that the system is way from being perfect and verdicts are flawed. You only have to look at some of the vitriol on here from those who can see no other possible conclusion to this sad affair. They would have you guilty before a word was spoken in your defence. Rape is an abhorrent crime. Some have asked what would I do were it my wife or daughter. That question is absolutely irrelevant in this case. If it were known beyond doubt that Evans WAS guilty, either by his own admission or other means I would have doubled his sentence. It happens however that like many more before him he still protests his innocence! Are we therefore to ignore his protests, simply believing ALL that has been said by the "victim?" Her ability to lie has been well documented. The cases I have referred to in the previous posts show just how so called justice got it wrong big time! The likes of Marcus Simpleton and Marychain  seem to think that it is a certainty Evans is guilty simply because a jury says so! Therefore they would have agreed with Timothy Evans being hanged for Christie's crimes,  Stefan Kiszko incarcerated for ever for the murder of Lesley Molseed whilst the killer Ronald Castree remained at large.  Their idiotic assumption that just because a jury, possibly made up of people who would struggle to complete the Beano crossword returned a guilty verdict on Evans, then it MUST be true! It is beyond belief. He may BE guilty, then again I would certainly NOT want to bet my life on it!!!  The flaming torch bearers may one day be on the wrong end of a charge. I hope that when they try to prove their innocence they dont come up against the likes of themselves!