|
By:
The blokes a moron. Don't bother to read it.
|
|
By:
I haven't read ima's recent tome, but, like everyone else he's entitled to his opinion. I'm sure there will be people agree with him and equally as many disagree.
There have been differing views from some good posters on this thread, it's all about opinion and if you have been a critic or a defender I doubt anyone will change your mind. |
|
By:
How come the horse apparently got the better of Fallon until the home straight when Fallon got the better of him?
If a horse is a dodge-pot there is no way he would have run on for Fallon, or run in patches. The whole thing was very strange. If you look at the odds in running, isn't it rare to have such large sums matched at the points in the betting when it was a no-hoper? |
|
By:
10.00 £1,085
10.50 £11 11.00 £71 11.50 £151 12.00 £6 13.00 £129 14.00 £20 15.50 £2 16.00 £107 16.50 £10 17.00 £46 18.00 £53 20.00 £411 21.00 £88 22.00 £19 24.00 £134 26.00 £127 27.00 £14 28.00 £175 29.00 £11 30.00 £27 32.00 £481 40.00 £55 |
|
By:
Dr Crippen 08 Aug 14 18:53
I can't believe that ima_mazed66 writes all his bollox in defence of Fallon for free. Somebody must be paying him to write it. asparagus 08 Aug 14 19:11 The blokes a moron. Don't bother to read it. I love the way when posters like these two talk nonsense (although they are entitled to all the same) that when I counter it, the best they can come back with is a generic and usually abusive retort, rather than specifically address and rip to shreds my points, which should be easily enough if they are supposedly b0ll0cks and I'm apparently a moron. I bet too that either of them went back to have another watch to see if what I was saying was accurate or not....Or maybe they did and saw it was and that explains their responses? ![]() Thank you holywell for you kind words, although actually not kind as such (although I still appreciate them) but just showing general decency, as opposed to being abusive to a stranger they wouldn't know even if they passed them in the street, for no other reason than they happen to take a different view to them.....And then I get told I'm the moron. ![]() tilted 08 Aug 14 19:38 How come the horse apparently got the better of Fallon until the home straight when Fallon got the better of him? If a horse is a dodge-pot there is no way he would have run on for Fallon, or run in patches. And did it have nothing to do then with the ones in front treading water and stopping then? Do those really count as large sums? And how exactly do you tell at which point in the race it was a no-hoper in relation to the race itself? So for example if I were to randomly pick the £88 matched at 21.00 then where is Fallon's horse at that particular stage of the race? Plus don't people trade out/green up in running during races? If I put £50 on a horse at 40.00 when it's say in 4th and 6L down and then it moves into 3rd and is 3L down and so its price has cut to 28.00 then I can take advantage of that can't I or am I missing something here? |