Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Fergal Lynch granted permission to ride in Britain / 06 Aug 14
Integrity
The British Horseracing Authority (BHA) has today informed Fergal Lynch that it has lifted the restriction preventing him from riding in Great Britain and he has been granted permission to ride under BHA Rules of Racing as an overseas jockey, initially for a probationary period.
The decision to lift the restriction was made by BHA and followed the receipt of an application from Lynch, together with extensive written submissions, and subsequent interviews with Lynch and his representatives.
The lifting of this restriction will be subject to on-going review and is for an initial one year period. In addition, BHA has imposed, and Lynch has agreed to, several conditions which must be adhered to in order for Lynch to continue to be permitted to compete in Britain, as follows:
That Lynch satisfactorily participates in a BHA integrity education video.
That Lynch’s first ride is at a time and date agreed with BHA. The proposed date for this return, subject to condition 1 being satisfactorily delivered, is Monday 11 August at Ayr racecourse.
That Lynch participates in the on-going delivery of BHA education programmes and educational material. Details of this programme and the timing of its commencement will be agreed in due course.
The BHA reserves the right to withdraw this permission, in the event that Lynch is charged with any integrity-related breach of the Rules of Racing, or if the conditions set out above are not met.
As an overseas jockey, Lynch will continue to ride predominantly in other jurisdictions.
Adam Brickell, Director of Integrity, Legal and Risk for BHA, said:
“The decision to allow Fergal Lynch to return to riding in Great Britain was one which was not straightforward and one we gave a lot of consideration to. We were aware that we had to balance the reputation of the sport against assessment of the individual merits of his application.
“In this case we have reached the conclusion that it would be fair and reasonable to permit Lynch to ride in Britain, based on the merits of his case.
“Lynch has shown through his application and subsequent interviews that he has satisfactorily addressed the concerns raised by the Licensing Committee when it refused to grant him a British licence in 2011.
“He has demonstrated that he understands the gravity of his offences and the impact they had on British racing. He accepts the severity of the fine and sanctions that were imposed upon him and the consequences that they had on his career, and he has shown that he possesses the qualities to abide by the rules of other jurisdictions during his time riding in Ireland and overseas. We have been encouraged by the open manner of his engagement with the BHA during the course of the application.
“We also noted Lynch’s enthusiasm for helping others learn from his mistakes, which we will utilise as we look to further modernise our approach to integrity education, especially for younger riders. He has also acknowledged publicly his past mistakes, the level of his culpability, and expressed his contrition.
“It is now 10 years since Fergal Lynch committed those offences and he has paid a price for his mistakes. While the passage of time in its own right does not impact on such a decision, the manner in which Lynch has conducted himself in that period is important. Lynch has satisfied us during the course of his application that he has successfully reformed his character and that subject to the agreed conditions, he should be allowed the opportunity to race ride in Britain once again.
“BHA has shown in recent years that those who seek to undermine the integrity of the sport will be dealt with severely through the disciplinary process. This case is a matter of assessing Lynch’s personal qualities, and recognising but not seeking to further punish previous behaviour. That assessment has led us to the conclusion that it is now fair and reasonable to permit Lynch to ride in Britain.”
Notes to Editors
1. If Lynch decides he would like to ride predominantly in Great Britain, he would be required to submit an application for a Jockey’s licence with BHA. Lynch has agreed that no such application would be made before one year, or following the review of his being granted permission to ride in Britain.
2. Whilst Lynch’s current restriction has been lifted, this is without prejudice to the determination of any future application he may make with the BHA, and that any application submitted would be considered on its merits, within the framework set out for Jockeys’ Licences in the Guidance Notes.
3. Timeline:
In July 2009, following a plea-bargain from Lynch, the Disciplinary Panel imposed upon him a fine of £50,000 and directed that he should not apply for a licence to ride in Britain, or attempt to ride in Britain on an international licence, for 12 months.
Full details of the decision and reasons of the Disciplinary Panel can be found here: http://www.britishhorseracing.com/resource-centre/disciplinary-results/disciplinaryappeal-hearings/disciplinary/?result=535a3054b33ebfaa5320ec2f.
Prior to the Disciplinary Panel ruling Lynch had been riding in the United States, but following the Panel’s finding the licensing authority at the Philadelphia Park track where he had been riding decided it would not approve him as a jockey unless he obtained a British licence.
In October 2010 Lynch made an application for a Jockey’s licence in Great Britain. A Licensing Committee hearing was held on 28 February 2011 to consider the matter and the Licensing Committee rejected the application. The full reasons of the Committee can be found here: http://www.britishhorseracing.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Fergal-Lynch-9-March-2011.pdf.
In Spring 2011 Lynch was granted a licence to ride in Spain.
In May 2011 the Irish Turf Club then granted Lynch permission to ride a horse at Killarney on his Spanish licence.
Between September and November 2011 Lynch also rode in France and Germany on his Spanish licence.
In November 2011 Lynch moved back to the United Kingdom and began to ride more regularly in Ireland, still on his Spanish licence.
In March 2012 Lynch applied for a Jockey’s licence in Ireland and in April 2012 this application was accepted with the condition that he could only ride in Ireland and Spain for a probationary period. Permission was subsequently given by France in October 2012.
In May 2012 Lynch moved to Ireland to take up a role as stable jockey for David Marnane.
On 12 December 2012 the Irish Turf Club granted Lynch a full Jockey’s licence which lifted all restrictions on where he was able to ride.
In January 2013 Lynch was granted a licence to ride in the United Arab Emirates.
Although licensed elsewhere, Lynch has until now been prevented from riding in races held under BHA Rules of Racing in accordance with Rule (A)65.
Integrity
The British Horseracing Authority (BHA) has today informed Fergal Lynch that it has lifted the restriction preventing him from riding in Great Britain and he has been granted permission to ride under BHA Rules of Racing as an overseas jockey, initially for a probationary period.
The decision to lift the restriction was made by BHA and followed the receipt of an application from Lynch, together with extensive written submissions, and subsequent interviews with Lynch and his representatives.
The lifting of this restriction will be subject to on-going review and is for an initial one year period. In addition, BHA has imposed, and Lynch has agreed to, several conditions which must be adhered to in order for Lynch to continue to be permitted to compete in Britain, as follows:
That Lynch satisfactorily participates in a BHA integrity education video.
That Lynch’s first ride is at a time and date agreed with BHA. The proposed date for this return, subject to condition 1 being satisfactorily delivered, is Monday 11 August at Ayr racecourse.
That Lynch participates in the on-going delivery of BHA education programmes and educational material. Details of this programme and the timing of its commencement will be agreed in due course.
The BHA reserves the right to withdraw this permission, in the event that Lynch is charged with any integrity-related breach of the Rules of Racing, or if the conditions set out above are not met.
As an overseas jockey, Lynch will continue to ride predominantly in other jurisdictions.
Adam Brickell, Director of Integrity, Legal and Risk for BHA, said:
“The decision to allow Fergal Lynch to return to riding in Great Britain was one which was not straightforward and one we gave a lot of consideration to. We were aware that we had to balance the reputation of the sport against assessment of the individual merits of his application.
“In this case we have reached the conclusion that it would be fair and reasonable to permit Lynch to ride in Britain, based on the merits of his case.
“Lynch has shown through his application and subsequent interviews that he has satisfactorily addressed the concerns raised by the Licensing Committee when it refused to grant him a British licence in 2011.
“He has demonstrated that he understands the gravity of his offences and the impact they had on British racing. He accepts the severity of the fine and sanctions that were imposed upon him and the consequences that they had on his career, and he has shown that he possesses the qualities to abide by the rules of other jurisdictions during his time riding in Ireland and overseas. We have been encouraged by the open manner of his engagement with the BHA during the course of the application.
“We also noted Lynch’s enthusiasm for helping others learn from his mistakes, which we will utilise as we look to further modernise our approach to integrity education, especially for younger riders. He has also acknowledged publicly his past mistakes, the level of his culpability, and expressed his contrition.
“It is now 10 years since Fergal Lynch committed those offences and he has paid a price for his mistakes. While the passage of time in its own right does not impact on such a decision, the manner in which Lynch has conducted himself in that period is important. Lynch has satisfied us during the course of his application that he has successfully reformed his character and that subject to the agreed conditions, he should be allowed the opportunity to race ride in Britain once again.
“BHA has shown in recent years that those who seek to undermine the integrity of the sport will be dealt with severely through the disciplinary process. This case is a matter of assessing Lynch’s personal qualities, and recognising but not seeking to further punish previous behaviour. That assessment has led us to the conclusion that it is now fair and reasonable to permit Lynch to ride in Britain.”
Notes to Editors
1. If Lynch decides he would like to ride predominantly in Great Britain, he would be required to submit an application for a Jockey’s licence with BHA. Lynch has agreed that no such application would be made before one year, or following the review of his being granted permission to ride in Britain.
2. Whilst Lynch’s current restriction has been lifted, this is without prejudice to the determination of any future application he may make with the BHA, and that any application submitted would be considered on its merits, within the framework set out for Jockeys’ Licences in the Guidance Notes.
3. Timeline:
In July 2009, following a plea-bargain from Lynch, the Disciplinary Panel imposed upon him a fine of £50,000 and directed that he should not apply for a licence to ride in Britain, or attempt to ride in Britain on an international licence, for 12 months.
Full details of the decision and reasons of the Disciplinary Panel can be found here: http://www.britishhorseracing.com/resource-centre/disciplinary-results/disciplinaryappeal-hearings/disciplinary/?result=535a3054b33ebfaa5320ec2f.
Prior to the Disciplinary Panel ruling Lynch had been riding in the United States, but following the Panel’s finding the licensing authority at the Philadelphia Park track where he had been riding decided it would not approve him as a jockey unless he obtained a British licence.
In October 2010 Lynch made an application for a Jockey’s licence in Great Britain. A Licensing Committee hearing was held on 28 February 2011 to consider the matter and the Licensing Committee rejected the application. The full reasons of the Committee can be found here: http://www.britishhorseracing.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Fergal-Lynch-9-March-2011.pdf.
In Spring 2011 Lynch was granted a licence to ride in Spain.
In May 2011 the Irish Turf Club then granted Lynch permission to ride a horse at Killarney on his Spanish licence.
Between September and November 2011 Lynch also rode in France and Germany on his Spanish licence.
In November 2011 Lynch moved back to the United Kingdom and began to ride more regularly in Ireland, still on his Spanish licence.
In March 2012 Lynch applied for a Jockey’s licence in Ireland and in April 2012 this application was accepted with the condition that he could only ride in Ireland and Spain for a probationary period. Permission was subsequently given by France in October 2012.
In May 2012 Lynch moved to Ireland to take up a role as stable jockey for David Marnane.
On 12 December 2012 the Irish Turf Club granted Lynch a full Jockey’s licence which lifted all restrictions on where he was able to ride.
In January 2013 Lynch was granted a licence to ride in the United Arab Emirates.
Although licensed elsewhere, Lynch has until now been prevented from riding in races held under BHA Rules of Racing in accordance with Rule (A)65.
Show More
i'm all for innocent till proved guilty but if found guilty the punishment has to be life, its harsh but jockeys know the score, though with second chances being given out they might think the risks are worth talking now
The problem is if he is allowed to ride practically anywhere else there may be little legal justification for stopping him riding here.
Paul Bittar's going away present for us all.
Charming....
Charming....
Perhaps Fergal will be the new Charlie Smirke and ride this year's Leger winner.
There again.....perhaps not.
There again.....perhaps not.
Lynch and integrity. you dont often hear those two words in the same sentence.
do you think he will land the double and get back with emma
of course, the timing of the racing posts PR tripe is sheer coincidence
Mill1ngton should hang his head in shame
Mill1ngton should hang his head in shame
One suspects the RP had the info even before onlooker.
I wouldn't mind this so much, if others who have committed similar offences were also prevented from riding in the UK for a full decade. As a punter, I don't want to see the little cheat back in the game but at least he has served a proper win. Some are welcomed back within a year or so
Lets hope no trainer employs him. One of the cheats will I suppose.
There is not a fully fledged Jockey riding who has not "stopped" horses at their Trainer's instructions.
doubt they have delibrately stopped one......wouldnt be worth it
not that i would say that about a irish jockey we all know and love
Every jockey has been asked to give a horse a 'quiet' ride, so they have all stopped them. They would'nt get many rides if they refused.
"..... harsh but jockeys know the score, though with second chances being given out they might think the risks are worth talking now"
totally agree, not interested in sob stories or how sorry they are, he knew the score and still took the risk. It is only right that cheats are dealt with severely. Hope he has learnt his lesson, he has paid a price, and now this is subject to on-going review for an initial one year period. But understandably lot of people don't like seeing cheats back in the game.
totally agree, not interested in sob stories or how sorry they are, he knew the score and still took the risk. It is only right that cheats are dealt with severely. Hope he has learnt his lesson, he has paid a price, and now this is subject to on-going review for an initial one year period. But understandably lot of people don't like seeing cheats back in the game.
So that's the confirmation of what we all knew that RP front page was about earlier in the week - a public relations exercise ahead of this announcement.
forget the trainers what owner in his right mind would put him up ,besides a bent one obviously,but his every ride will be under the microscope not worth the hassel for genuine owners
will he have to give up his betfair account ,another lost customer for the exchange 
1,01 that thommo does the 1st sycophantic ,tug your forlock interview
Do you know what, I will be amazed if there is anyone left watching racing in 20 years time. Does any other sport treat its audience base with quite such contempt as horse racing. You have to be ever craftier to get a bet on with any bookie, get restricted for your trouble or offered lousy odds before you even get to the race, where you could be shafted by a dodgy jockey, trainer, or both 
The younger generation of gamblers are not so loyal to horse racing as us older ones, and have grown up in an environment where betting on other sports is far more accessible than ever. Racing seems to have a death wish.
The younger generation of gamblers are not so loyal to horse racing as us older ones, and have grown up in an environment where betting on other sports is far more accessible than ever. Racing seems to have a death wish.
Dead right Quvega. Dont see many young people backing horses in the shops. They bet on football mostly. Us older ones know what goes on but we just put up with it.If any government put a block on the machines, betting shops will not survive.
it should be interesting to see which trainers actually employ him
disgusting decision - should be ashamed of themselves...... but the toffs won't have any idea what they've done.
by which trainers do you mean the layers or the backers, 
Its a real shame. In other sports you see jail time even for spot fixing. Punters always treated last in racing.
i also agree quvega , but the main problem racing has it that nearly every single section of racing is run by someone or some company purely to make money for themselves or shareholders , and not the benefit of the sport . that will be racing demise .
The reason the French can increase funds is due to the statutory link between betting and funding, underwritten in law. In 2009 the Paris Mutuel, French racing’s betting market, reported income of €9.3 Billion of which €731 Million was returned to racing. 2010 is reported a higher still.
Back in the UK, the Betting Levy Board put just £62.5 Million into the sport in 2009! Admittedly there are differences in the two betting markets, but what France has is a system which covers the earnings of ALL betting on French racing, whether wagered on the Paris Mutuel or on exchanges or the internet.
The reason the French can increase funds is due to the statutory link between betting and funding, underwritten in law. In 2009 the Paris Mutuel, French racing’s betting market, reported income of €9.3 Billion of which €731 Million was returned to racing. 2010 is reported a higher still.
Back in the UK, the Betting Levy Board put just £62.5 Million into the sport in 2009! Admittedly there are differences in the two betting markets, but what France has is a system which covers the earnings of ALL betting on French racing, whether wagered on the Paris Mutuel or on exchanges or the internet.
once a cr00k allways a cr00k, he should never be allowed to ride in the uk again after his actions in c0nning punters
are the bha sorting out his rides as well ?
with so many good jockeys around at the moment, many struggling to get rides themselves,why would you put this character up ?
with so many good jockeys around at the moment, many struggling to get rides themselves,why would you put this character up ?
something called the exchanges more that one way to skin a cat
What happened to your Johnson thread Dodgy? Did it get erased?
Well I suppose if Mulrennan and Dwyer are riding after that phone conversation it is a hit harsh to deny Lynch.
The creation of the moniker "Burgle Pinch" remains a moment of genius.
mighty mac, yes I think it did? They don't like things like this staying on the forum for very long. I have put the horse SKYTRAIN in my tracker and I will watch its next run very closely and of course the betting patterns.
As others have pointed out, the ham-fisted and transparently manipulative Racing Post PR campaign designed to clear the pathway for this disgraceful decision was genuinely repulsive, but nothing less than should now be expected from this shell of a once great newspaper.
It's incredible to me that a proven c heat should now be welcomed back to the track with an open invitation to steal our money once again. The BHA of course, don't have that problem. In fact, under the GPT deal with the bookmakers, they have a vested financial interest in anything that makes it more difficult for punters - including corruption...
It's incredible to me that a proven c heat should now be welcomed back to the track with an open invitation to steal our money once again. The BHA of course, don't have that problem. In fact, under the GPT deal with the bookmakers, they have a vested financial interest in anything that makes it more difficult for punters - including corruption...
Just when you think racing can't sink any lower.
What next? G. Bradley will be looking for a stable jockey soon I expect.
What next? G. Bradley will be looking for a stable jockey soon I expect.
What about the victims in this sorry episode - the people that BACKED Bond City? Who's going to compensate them?
Will the backers of the winner of Bond City's race have to refund their winnings? Swings and roundabouts
millhouse
07 Aug 14 10:23
Joined:
09 Dec 03
| Topic/replies: 4,470 | Blogger: millhouse's blog
As others have pointed out, the ham-fisted and transparently manipulative Racing Post PR campaign designed to clear the pathway for this disgraceful decision was genuinely repulsive, but nothing less than should now be expected from this shell of a once great newspaper.
It's incredible to me that a proven c heat should now be welcomed back to the track with an open invitation to steal our money once again. The BHA of course, don't have that problem. In fact, under the GPT deal with the bookmakers, they have a vested financial interest in anything that makes it more difficult for punters - including corruption...
...........
I agree with your first part about the disgraceful Racing Post.
The second part however I cannot agree with. Anything that undermines the integrity of racing is bad for the BHA, punters and bookmakers. The only people who gain from it are those using the inside information and corrupting the great game.
If corrupt people are allowed to seep into racing it puts people off betting on the sport and it lowers, not increases, bookmaker and punters' potential profits and also racing's revenue. The profit of the corruption has to come from somewhere.
The BHA and the Racing Post should never support anyone who stops horses from winning and corrupts the game. Any trainer that supports it is also tapping another nail into the coffin of this once great sport.
07 Aug 14 10:23
Joined:
09 Dec 03
| Topic/replies: 4,470 | Blogger: millhouse's blog
As others have pointed out, the ham-fisted and transparently manipulative Racing Post PR campaign designed to clear the pathway for this disgraceful decision was genuinely repulsive, but nothing less than should now be expected from this shell of a once great newspaper.
It's incredible to me that a proven c heat should now be welcomed back to the track with an open invitation to steal our money once again. The BHA of course, don't have that problem. In fact, under the GPT deal with the bookmakers, they have a vested financial interest in anything that makes it more difficult for punters - including corruption...
...........
I agree with your first part about the disgraceful Racing Post.
The second part however I cannot agree with. Anything that undermines the integrity of racing is bad for the BHA, punters and bookmakers. The only people who gain from it are those using the inside information and corrupting the great game.
If corrupt people are allowed to seep into racing it puts people off betting on the sport and it lowers, not increases, bookmaker and punters' potential profits and also racing's revenue. The profit of the corruption has to come from somewhere.
The BHA and the Racing Post should never support anyone who stops horses from winning and corrupts the game. Any trainer that supports it is also tapping another nail into the coffin of this once great sport.
Frog, I'm obviously not suggesting the BHA have reinstated him for the reasons above, just that because of the GPT deal they do have a vested financial interest in corruption, or anything at all that makes life more difficult for punters.
Even so, what's 'good for the sport' certainly hasn't stopped the BHA from sanctioning jockeys steering into each other's paths in finishes, in what will inevitably lead to someone getting seriously injured, because they no longer want to have stewards throwing out horses that cross the line first.
Without any doubt whatsoever, the BHA will have been informed in no uncertain terms how much the big three having to pay out twice when horses get disqualified costs 'the Levy', imo...
Even so, what's 'good for the sport' certainly hasn't stopped the BHA from sanctioning jockeys steering into each other's paths in finishes, in what will inevitably lead to someone getting seriously injured, because they no longer want to have stewards throwing out horses that cross the line first.
Without any doubt whatsoever, the BHA will have been informed in no uncertain terms how much the big three having to pay out twice when horses get disqualified costs 'the Levy', imo...
As dodgy claimer mentioned, Skytrain run yesterday was very suspect. The jockey made all and won the next race. Hayley Turner done the same thing the other night on Conry. Of course there might be no foul play but the honest punter still loses their money. Letting Fergal back isn't going to sully clear waters.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539