Because they are a bookie channel Remember ATR wouldn't even acknowledge exchanges for years, was it around 2006 where they changed tact and started mentioning them? IR isn't associated with bookies but with exchanges so why would bookies want you having opaquely disguised subscription pics to use IR? It certainly ain't the tech since that proves it was their end product on 7e. Without anybody getting the truth from them all that can be devised is that they dish up delays as standard to the British customer.....and their sponsors sell loans at ridiculous rates following the last race that you just lost it on.
Because they are a bookie channelRemember ATR wouldn't even acknowledge exchanges for years, was it around 2006 where they changed tact and started mentioning them?IR isn't associated with bookies but with exchanges so why would bookies want you havi
For the benefit of the utterly stupid,the ATR Delay is entirely by their design. When I had SIS the gap between them and ATR was 1.7 seconds. In 2011 the gap increased to 2.2 seconds. The latest increase in "Delay" increased it to 4.2 seconds and has been in place for some time. Compare ATR (7.0 seconds behind live) with RUK who have reduced their delay to being 1.0 second behind live. Amazingly,you still get cretins on here bleating about the monthly fee for RUK.
For the benefit of the utterly stupid,the ATR Delay is entirely by their design.When I had SIS the gap between them and ATR was 1.7 seconds.In 2011 the gap increased to 2.2 seconds.The latest increase in "Delay" increased it to 4.2 seconds and has be
The irony was that there was an ruk feed as well as ATR They were both the same speed
The question here is, should ATR/sis be allowed to farm rights to nearly half of British racing, when they are an amalgamation of bookies that profit from keeping the poor losing, selling on sponsors odious loans and advertise both their product as free (when it's part of a subscription package) and their pictures as 'live' when they clearly start out as that then become 'recorded'? Since we are talking about a vehicle associated with betting, that's is idiots in my book.
Compare to ruk who ostensibly are a tv channel that covers racing, they supply more to the tracks and have a vesting interest not in bookies winning but in their clients (the customer) being able to pay a subscription.
No wonga adverts on RUK
The irony was that there was an ruk feed as well as ATRThey were both the same speedThe question here is, should ATR/sis be allowed to farm rights to nearly half of British racing, when they are an amalgamation of bookies that profit from keeping the
The fact that the delay on ATR is just swept under the carpet is a total disgrace.
This delay is there on purpose. They should not be allowed to promote our sport with their rancid channel
The fact that the delay on ATR is just swept under the carpet is a total disgrace.This delay is there on purpose. They should not be allowed to promote our sport with their rancid channel