|
By:
Its a scandal imo
|
|
By:
whats 7E?
|
|
By:
so they CAN do it henke?
Ill bet they let slip putting it up unencryped |
|
By:
Eutelsat 7A (7.0°E)
Frequency: 11192 - Pol: V - SR: 3255 - |
|
By:
That is disgusting - I wish somebody in the racing media would kick up a stink about this.
|
|
By:
what a pity they cant do this on atr make life so much easier
![]() |
|
By:
so its got the ATR graphics on it......thats odd
|
|
By:
they can
![]() |
|
By:
Not only can they show it they have DELIBERATELY went out of their way to slow it down then
|
|
By:
Can you tune this in on a sky box?
|
|
By:
?
|
|
By:
Everyone knows that ATR have slowed the pics down on purpose. Like I have said for years they are a disgrace and pure filth
|
|
By:
no
you would need a dish pointed at 7E or motorised to move to 7E sky dish is fixed pointed at 28.2E |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
All That's Rancid
|
|
By:
And your sky box can't be set to the symbol rate ( 3255 ).
|
|
By:
They're a rancid organisation. The sooner they lose the rights to most tracks the better.
|
|
By:
Why have ATR slowed the pics down ?
|
|
By:
The ATR Pics are no slower today than normal.
They are 7.0 seconds behind "Live". |
|
By:
I meant why would they in the first place.
They live on advertising and if people call them rancid then advertisers would be put off surely ![]() |
|
By:
Because they are a bookie channel
Remember ATR wouldn't even acknowledge exchanges for years, was it around 2006 where they changed tact and started mentioning them? IR isn't associated with bookies but with exchanges so why would bookies want you having opaquely disguised subscription pics to use IR? It certainly ain't the tech since that proves it was their end product on 7e. Without anybody getting the truth from them all that can be devised is that they dish up delays as standard to the British customer.....and their sponsors sell loans at ridiculous rates following the last race that you just lost it on. |
|
By:
But that's enterprise innit so it's all ok
|
|
By:
Matt Williams is on the case.He's waiting for a meeting to finish.Then we will have the full story why ATR slowed up.
|
|
By:
For the benefit of the utterly stupid,the ATR Delay is entirely by their design.
When I had SIS the gap between them and ATR was 1.7 seconds. In 2011 the gap increased to 2.2 seconds. The latest increase in "Delay" increased it to 4.2 seconds and has been in place for some time. Compare ATR (7.0 seconds behind live) with RUK who have reduced their delay to being 1.0 second behind live. Amazingly,you still get cretins on here bleating about the monthly fee for RUK. |
|
By:
The irony was that there was an ruk feed as well as ATR
They were both the same speed The question here is, should ATR/sis be allowed to farm rights to nearly half of British racing, when they are an amalgamation of bookies that profit from keeping the poor losing, selling on sponsors odious loans and advertise both their product as free (when it's part of a subscription package) and their pictures as 'live' when they clearly start out as that then become 'recorded'? Since we are talking about a vehicle associated with betting, that's is idiots in my book. Compare to ruk who ostensibly are a tv channel that covers racing, they supply more to the tracks and have a vesting interest not in bookies winning but in their clients (the customer) being able to pay a subscription. No wonga adverts on RUK |
|
By:
*insidious not idiots
|
|
By:
hi ,,can anyone help,, was wondering when ascot moves to ruk from atr?, ...and atr is murder, never bet on atr races!! in running, pure conn!!!
|
|
By:
Royal Ascot,Troy.
|
|
By:
The fact that the delay on ATR is just swept under the carpet is a total disgrace.
This delay is there on purpose. They should not be allowed to promote our sport with their rancid channel |