Distance backers seething

Agreed

Why?

Do you really need to be explained too or are you genuinely not watching?

They should not be, it was obvious he was not going to do anymore than needed, if anything they should have been on unders.

Jan 28, 2014 -- 2:36PM, Derbywinner1 wrote:

Do you really need to be explained too or are you genuinely not watching?

Think he meant, what you saw was always going to happen. QUEALLY treated it a like a spin on the gallops'. He knows what the horse can do,
so no point letting the handbrake off.

I'm on about the whole meeting where that races could have been key. Thinking about this I thought to myself as usual the bookies have too many rules to benefit them such as the maximum distance...If a horse wins by 100 it should be 100. If you lay goals they don't stop at 4 because generally you don't get a 7-0 drumming.

wish I`d been on track would have bid it up til 6k to get my own back and let them know it was queally`s  fault for winning too cosily.............

Riding to instructions, perchance. Didnt hold Frankel back too often.