Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Derbywinner1
28 Jan 14 14:34
Joined:
Date Joined: 23 Oct 10
| Topic/replies: 70 | Blogger: Derbywinner1's blog
Southwell...

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 8
By:
onehundredandeighty
When: 28 Jan 14 14:34
Agreed
By:
roggrain
When: 28 Jan 14 14:35
Why?
By:
Derbywinner1
When: 28 Jan 14 14:36
Do you really need to be explained too or are you genuinely not watching?
By:
Oh no!! not another Villa fan
When: 28 Jan 14 14:37
They should not be, it was obvious he was not going to do anymore than needed, if anything they should have been on unders.
By:
MARILYNMANSON
When: 28 Jan 14 14:38

Jan 28, 2014 -- 2:36PM, Derbywinner1 wrote:


Do you really need to be explained too or are you genuinely not watching?


Think he meant, what you saw was always going to happen. QUEALLY treated it a like a spin on the gallops'. He knows what the horse can do,
so no point letting the handbrake off.

By:
Derbywinner1
When: 28 Jan 14 14:40
I'm on about the whole meeting where that races could have been key. Thinking about this I thought to myself as usual the bookies have too many rules to benefit them such as the maximum distance...If a horse wins by 100 it should be 100. If you lay goals they don't stop at 4 because generally you don't get a 7-0 drumming.
By:
pieman
When: 28 Jan 14 14:44
wish I`d been on track would have bid it up til 6k to get my own back and let them know it was queally`s  fault for winning too cosily.............
By:
harry2.1
When: 28 Jan 14 14:46
Riding to instructions, perchance. Didnt hold Frankel back too often.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com