Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 126 comments are related to the topic:
CRAIG WILLIAMS & DANDINO ..

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 126
By:
megsy
When: 22 Oct 13 01:34
spyker Date Joined: 09 Oct 07 Add contact When: 21 Oct 13 10:31

Dandino's  credentials on the line today with the running of 67 rated Brockfield (horse he beat in his maiden) in the 540 at Ponte - will his form be franked and he be made clear fav for the MC after this class 4 hacp today?


you could say the same about mount athos, sea moon, fiorente and 25 other english, irish horses left in the melbourne cup. like i said understand a group 1 handicap

actually all your stayers have been spoilt with low weights under WFA, how does sea moon recieve only 56 kg ???Crazy



no cheery picking imamaze and what has aussie sprinters got to do with all this, but seeing you brought it up, take over target won many at 1350, 1400m and placed at group 1 mile, you call him a sprinter, but moonlight cloud had excuses because she won at 1300m and 1400m even after the trainer of moonlight cloud declared game on, he didnt fear black caviar, but you make the excuses.


ive mentioned to you many time the 3, one was even uk's champion 10f horse

i still await who your top 10 stayers are and possibly state who your 5 top 10f horse maybe.
By:
megsy
When: 22 Oct 13 01:35
Frankyfish, dear demi still in the cup, great run staurday. best run from saturday was jet away, they keep saying he ran 2 miles in that mile and 1/2 race and and finished close up 4th.
just needs to settle.
By:
megsy
When: 22 Oct 13 01:43
and more about takeover target, ffs he was trained by a part time taxi driver and raced at royal ascot right up until he was 11 years old.

medically he was un sound, a week to week propostion, joe the taxi driver paid about $1300 for him at a rail yard destine for the knackery.

as his trainer said over and over again, takeover target was not in black caviars league, she would have picked him up going past and towed him over the line.

so please enough bringing up poor old takeover target. not his fault joe the taxi driver wanted to greet the queen every year Grin
By:
SecondComing
When: 22 Oct 13 03:23
does not take much to win a group 1 in europe, might drug myself up and have a crack actually

**** drug infested **** racing, **** doing their money day in day out

arabic camel owners making millions LaughLaugh
By:
ima_mazed66
When: 22 Oct 13 03:24
megsy 22 Oct 13 01:34 

actually all your stayers have been spoilt with low weights under WFA, how does sea moon recieve only 56 kg ???


I'm guessing it's something to do with Sea Moon not being one of our ex-top stayers like you laughably claim unless that "one of" is one of a high n umber and it's got that wait due to never having won a Gr1 over here before.

That 56.5kg SM has been given for the MC (the same as Red Cadeaux) is around 8st 9lbs and then contrast that with say **** being given 59kg in his year or around 9st 4lbs and a difference of about 9lbs and that will be because **** was a previous Gr1 in the UK before being set a weight in the MC. Sea Moon ran in the King George and was 5th of 10 beaten 2¼L behind the winner and Brown Panther was 7th beaten 4L and BP has been given 56kg.

Oh and you asked "no cheery picking imamaze and what has aussie sprinters got to do with all this, but seeing you brought it up, take over target....." well I knew your problems on retaining info I put you right on was bad but now you seem to be having trouble retaining your own info. Here's why I responded to it:

megsy 21 Oct 13 10:06 
we know European stayers are better than ours, like our sprinters are superior


I was reminding you that they aren't superior as they got spanked by ours more often than they won and Takeover Target was just one I chose at radom but feel free to give us the list of excuses for plenty of the other Aussie flop sprinters that came over.

Don't make the mistake of thinking I don't know the 3 as that's the very reason I put the word Aussie in quotes but I want to see which ones you choose to name so then I can reel off the ones you conveniently choose to forget, like say Elvstroem for example? Plus will you also mentioned the several defeats too of the ones you are claiming as Aussie trained even though I suspect the record books will show otherwise in some cases? Funny isn't it that if an ex-Aussie trained horse comes here and wins for a UK or Irish based trainer it's because it's supposedly to do with the standards of ex-horses Aussie horses but when they get beaten here then it's because our trainers can't train, Yet when our average ex-UK horses go over there and win and/or put up a go show it's because your Aussie trainers have improved them and nothing else. Laugh

I'm not quite sure what me listing our top stayers will achieve and SM was more a borderline stayer anyway and arguably a middle distance horse and apart from anything else, some I'd list will have retired and others might not have faced SM but the even Masked Marvel beat SM before your trainers got their hands on both horses and did their best to ruin them by supposedly turning them into speedsters like you claimed that word (still kills me that one lmfao) and others like Nathaniel, SNA and Camelot (Irish but with plenty of UK form) and Great Heavens have all previously beaten SM. He only raced in Europe at what might be considered borderline staying to staying races a handful of times so it would be impossible to make a proven direct comparison with too many others, but if you want to step up in trip to the 1m6f and Cup racers then others come into it like Cavalryman, Colour Vision, Duncan and Opinion Poll for example and I'm sure there will be others too I can't think of.

Then of course there are the ones that SM might not have ever met like Crystal Capella, Dancing Rain, Hillstar, Rewilding, Midday, Snow Fairy, Twice Over, Wigmore Hall, Workforce and I'd say Sea Moon would be roughly on a par with the likes of Brown Panther, Dandino, Dunaden and Red Cadeux or there wouldn't be an awful lot between all of them on their very best form.
By:
ima_mazed66
When: 22 Oct 13 03:25
LOL....Not sure why Ye@ts has been censored as **** ffs.
By:
SecondComing
When: 22 Oct 13 03:43
Sea Moon started 2-1 favorite in that king george, you left that bit out
By:
megsy
When: 22 Oct 13 04:23
yes sea moon was an average horse, can you explain starting favorite against these AVERAGE horsesWink you are so full of it Laugh


21 Jul 2012
« 4:35 » King George VI And Queen Elizabeth Stakes
Sponsored By Betfair (British Champions Series) (Group 1) .
(Class 1) (3yo+) 1m4f Good To Soft
£567,100.00, £215,000.00, £107,600.00, £53,600.00, £26,900.00, £13,500.00

WATCH RACE - 25p .RESULTRATE RACE.Show all comments in running Show all pedigrees.      HORSE/SP AGE WGT TRAINER/JOCKEY OR TS RPR   
 
«  1 4   Danedream (GER) 9/1   4 9-4  P Schiergen  128 * * » 
b m Lomitas - Danedrop (IRE) (Danehill) A Starke
   
 
«  2 3  nse  Nathaniel (IRE) 5/2  4 9-7  John Gosden  126 * * » 
b h Galileo (IRE) - Magnificient Style (USA) (Silver Hawk) William Buick
 
)   

 
«  3 8  1½  St Nicholas Abbey (IRE) 5/1  5 9-7  A P O'Brien  124 * * » 
b h Montjeu (IRE) - Leaping Water (Sure Blade) Joseph O'Brien
     

 
« 4 9  hd  Reliable Man 20/1  4 9-7 t A De Royer-Dupre  118 * * » 
gr h Dalakhani (IRE) - On Fair Stage (IRE) (Sadler's Wells) Olivier Peslier
   
«  5 6  ½  Sea Moon 2/1 Favorite  4 9-7  Sir Michael Stoute  124 * * » 
b h Beat Hollow - Eva Luna (USA) (Alleged) Ryan Moore
   

 
«  6 2  1¼  Dunaden (FR) 8/1  6 9-7  M Delzangles  118 * * » 
b h Nicobar - La Marlia (FR) (Kaldounevees) Craig A Williams
   
 
« 7 10  ½  Brown Panther 20/1  4 9-7  Tom Dascombe  117 * * » 
b h Shirocco (GER) - Treble Heights (IRE) (Unfuwain) Kieren Fallon
   

 
« 8 7  10  Deep Brillante (JPN) 20/1  3 8-9  Yoshito Yahagi  118 * * 
b c Deep Impact (JPN) - Love And Bubbles (USA) (Loup Sauvage) Yasunari Iwata
   
« 9 5  ½  Masked Marvel 25/1  4 9-7  John Gosden  119 * * » 
b h Montjeu (IRE) - Waldmark (GER) (Mark Of Esteem) Frankie Dettori
   
« 10 1  40  Robin Hood (IRE) 100/1  4 9-7 v A P O'Brien  99 * * » 
b g Galileo (IRE) - Banquise (IRE) (Last Tycoon) Seamie Heffernan
By:
megsy
When: 22 Oct 13 04:26
and your so into ratings, hmmm, a average horse sea moon with an average ummm, rating of 124 Crazy



yep like i said...your full of it imamug Laugh

but type away, to convince only yourself Grin
By:
megsy
When: 22 Oct 13 04:38
should i also add that average horse you claim,SEA MOONbeat in the past

Midday…6 time group 1 winner

Sarafina …3 times group 1 winner and defeated Cirrus Des Aigles

Al Kazeem……3 times group 1 winner and defeated camelot


and started hot favorite twice against st nicholas abbey.


after viewing all this and the give me weight he has been given in the melbourne cup, he might be the horse to follow. though under WFA scale not one european horse has been given WFA or worst, strange that considering you have the best stayers ( claim ) in the world.Happy


but i wont educate you further imamug, you dont know the difference between a WFA group 1 and a handicap group 1 Wink
By:
earlycrow
When: 22 Oct 13 05:33
KO victory to Megsy IMO
By:
ima_mazed66
When: 22 Oct 13 05:54
SecondComing 22 Oct 13 03:43 
Sea Moon started 2-1 favorite in that king george, you left that bit out.


And?

Is that how it works then, the favourite horse in the race is always the best horse? Sea Moon had up until then never won a Gr1 in the UK and was later well beaten in the Gr1 Arc too. SNA had already beaten SM in a Grde 1 in America and was a multiple Gr1 winner in the UK, Nathaniel had beaten SNA in the King George the year before and so on related form lines had the beating of SM and Danedream won the Arc doing handstands and was it a course record at the time? All of those finished ahead of SM in that KG and their previous form entitled them to, the betting is just bookies/punters forming an opinion. Do all favourites win in Australia then?

megsy 22 Oct 13 04:23 
yes sea moon was an average horse, can you explain starting favorite against these AVERAGE horses you are so full of it.


You really must enjoy making a tw@t of yourself as where did I say Sea Moon was average? Laugh

Let me see if I can break it down into even smaller pieces for you to try to comprehend. Here is what I said:

"Yet when our average ex-UK horses go over there and win and/or put up a good show it's because your Aussie trainers have improved them and nothing else. Laugh "

So where is the name Sea Moon mentioned there?

If I'm talking about average horses and Sea Moon has won Gr2 races here and when it was first mentioned the horse had gone down there, some oposters were rightly saying it was a better class of horse than the average one usually being sold to do so, then its hardly average then is it ffs? Having said that, Khalid Abdullah doesn't tend to sell his very best ones anyway and keeps those for breeding, but I apologise for putting too much on you to work out that by using the word average I wasn't talking about Sea Moon and should have realised I was overtaxing you to come to that conclusion all by yourself.....Oh and you know the bit where I also said your trainers have done their best to ruining horses like SM and Masked Marvel by initially running them at trips far too short, see if you can work out whether I consider that as improving them or not. Blush

This might come as a revelation to you too but when you stick the letter S on the end of a word like horse, well that then makes it a plural and means it's more than one such as Bauer, Jet Away, Glass Harmonium, Glencadam Gold, Manighar, My Quest For Peace, Julienas and so on, none of which would be anywhere near the top flight when racing here. 

LOL @ you supposedly educating me on anything. I know full well the difference between proper Gr1s and your Mickey Mouse Gr1 handicaps and I've even said previously (but you will have had trouble retaining it) that a Gr1 that is a handicap is a contradiction in itself. Gr1s should be for the very best horses and all should carry the same weight bar age and sex allowances so that the range of weight carried is compressed in direct relation to ability. When that isn't the case then that's exactly what handicaps are for, to level the playing field based on weight carried by the better horses at the top end of the scale down to the lesser ones at the bottom. It should be either or and not both.

Why do you think they have weight divisions in sports like boxing or handicaps in pro-am golf tournaments? Would it be a fair fight for the number 20 ranked heavyweight to fight the number 1 ranked middleweight? Or how about if a amateur golfer playing off a low single figure handicap plays in The Open, should they knock shots off at the end of his round?
By:
megsy
When: 22 Oct 13 06:32
Do all favourites win in Australia then?



NO ...but to start favorite against your top liners doesnt make the horse ( sea moon ) average, it tells you something, have you ever won a race?....i would be suprised if you have with your stupidity reasonings, excuses, etc etc etc you bring up everytime Grin
By:
earlycrow
When: 22 Oct 13 06:35
Winner has already be declared, please move along
By:
SecondComing
When: 22 Oct 13 09:33
ima_mazed66 • October 22, 2013 5:54 AM BST
SecondComing 22 Oct 13 03:43 
Sea Moon started 2-1 favorite in that king george, you left that bit out.

And?

Is that how it works then, the favourite horse in the race is always the best horse? Sea Moon had up until then never won a Gr1 in the UK and was later well beaten in the Gr1 Arc too. SNA had already beaten SM in a Grde 1 in America and was a multiple Gr1 winner in the UK, Nathaniel had beaten SNA in the King George the year before and so on related form lines had the beating of SM and Danedream won the Arc doing handstands and was it a course record at the time? All of those finished ahead of SM in that KG and their previous form entitled them to, the betting is just bookies/punters forming an opinion. Do all favourites win in Australia then?


When something starts at 2-1 in any race then in the opinion of the bookmaker's and punters then the horse has a 50% chance of winning, now I want you to understand that the race the horse started even money in wasn't a lead up listed race or anything like that, it was a Group 1 in which all your highest rated stayers were competing in. I know I have raised a more than valid point here given your passive aggressive reply.

I don't care who beat who on what track in what country on what spec of grass, I couldn't care less. My point was simple, he started even money favorite in a Group 1 alongside the likes of Nathaniel, SNA and Danedream. Clearly the horse is above average.

The fact of the matter is this, you try to talk down every horse that comes to Australia as it reflects back on the state of your own racing. When are you going to shut the **** up and just enjoy the fact that these horses are travelling overseas, if you rate your own horses so highly then back them, if not.. don't.

Either way you need to shut the **** up, ****.
By:
ima_mazed66
When: 22 Oct 13 18:23
LOL....you have earlycrow embarrassingly saying winner already declared despite megsy still struggling with the fact I didn't call Sea Moon average and he continues to struggle with it despite me confirming I never said that by coming out with this gem:

megsy 22 Oct 13 06:32 
Do all favourites win in Australia then?

NO ...but to start favorite against your top liners doesnt make the horse ( sea moon ) average, it tells you something, have you ever won a race?....i would be suprised if you have with your stupidity reasonings, excuses, etc etc etc you bring up everytime.


You're not very bright down there are you? Oh and accusations excuses and reasons for defeat coming from the Aussies who find plenty of both every time one of there's gets spanked over here is ironic beyond belief.

Also once again I'm having to spoon feed you megsy considering you have oversimplified matters and not looked at the bigger picture (it's never good to be premature by the way either earlycrow) but you asked about stayers and then listed 2 horses that aren't stayers that Sea Moon beat in American. That race was 1m4f and I would have thought you could even worked out the easy stuff yourself such as in general the colts tend to beat the fillies and Midday and Sarafina are both fillies, which is the exact reason they get the sex weight allowance and they would have to be exceptional to beat the boys and decent as they were, they weren't exceptional.

Now we get to the bigger picture stuff that needs breaking down for you and we look at the trip and you mention Midday is a 6 times Gr1 winner, so care to tell us how many times at 1m4f? Or what about how many times she beat the boys? She ran 6 times at 1m4f from 23 starts and whilst I appreciate you have difficulty grasping the fact that an odd run here or there at a trip doesn't make that a horse's specialist trip, she also ran 11 times at 1m2f and of her 9 wins, 5 were at that trip and her 2 wins at 1m4f were against her own sex only, meaning the 4 times she tried 1m4f against the colts she was beaten. Much the same applies too to Sarafina where she only has 2 wins at 1m4f in a 11 race career, with one being a Gr2 4 runner race and the other being that neck defeat of CDA in a 5 runner field where races can often be run tactically with the French style of racing pace. That American race also came for both fillies after a busier season than Sea Moon and was their last ever runs and so they didn't really have much to lose.

Sea Moon also beat Al Kazeem at 1m4f in a Gr2 and whilst it's obvious that horse has improved passed Sea Moon with age, (hence the 3 Gr1 wins for AK and none for SM) once again AK's 3 Gr1 wins were all at less that 1m4f which is a trip it has only ever won at once before and wasn't at the highest level of Gr1, but has won several times at and around 1m2f, all of which kind of fcuks your (non) argument a little over the American race unfortunately for you, as when a decent horse that prefers one trip is disadvantage by racing another at that one's preferred trip and gets beaten, it doesn't really lose too much in defeat due to that disadvantage, as was the case with the miler Moonlight Cloud against the sprinter Black Caviar over a sprint distance.

My passive aggressive reply ComingSecond? Are you for real? I really couldn't make the point any clearer ffs!

And please don't embarrass yourself by converting fractions into winning change percentages as whilst that might technically be true, 2/1 isn't really Evens or 50/50 in betting terms like Evens or 50/50 is on a two possible outcome result like the toss of a coin. There were 10 other runners in the race and Nathaniel was priced at 5/2 (so not great difference) and I'm a great believer in only asking horses to do what they have done before, so given the choice of a previous CD/winner of the race like Nathniel that is also a multiple Gr1 winner or Sea Moon with no Gr1 wins at the CD and no Gr1 wins at all, then I think I know which one I'd prefer to be on and that's before even taking into account another horse I the line up that has already beaten Sea Moon and is a multiple Gr1 winner too at the trip and plus another that hosed up in the Arc also as a rival.

Have you never heard of the concept of opposing favourites with weaknesses? There are numerous people making their living on here by identifying poor favourites ffs! And since you talk of ratings in that King George race, SNA was rated the same as Sea Moon on 124 despite having previously beating him and both Nathaniel (126) and Dandream (128) were rated higher and not surprisingly all 3 (plus one other) as previous Gr1 1m4f winners finished in front of a horse that despite going off as fav had not yet achieved that feat.

Either way though my own argument was with the claim about SM being one of our very best stayers and if that isn't the case then it could have gone off odds-on in that race, still been well neaten and it still wouldn't apply......Oh and Sea Moon didn't start Even money fav anyway ffs, so stop making a total pr1ck of yourself.
By:
11kv
When: 22 Oct 13 18:26
Yea what Ima said...................Laugh
By:
earlycrow
When: 22 Oct 13 20:42
Hitting Megsy with a wet lettus leaf after the bell, now that's embarrassing
By:
ima_mazed66
When: 22 Oct 13 22:29
Making a tw@t of yourself by judging before hearing both sides, now that's what I call really embarrassing.

Please feel free to point out any inaccuracies facts wise in my post though......Personally I think your last reply is far more "wet lettuce" really considering you don't really have anything better to come back with or dispute what I have said.
By:
megsy
When: 23 Oct 13 00:59
well i'll be fcuked Laugh imamug now is a medium, knows what Khalid Abdullah thinks Laugh has no idea how muck LW payed for sea moon Whoops

imamug states fillies in general dont beat colts, so midway and safarina wernt exceptional for this reason Laugh

imamug states midway couldnt run 1m 4f even though she ran 25% of her races over that distance for 2 group 1 wins Laugh

and imamug states black caviar beat a miler who when she beat moon light cloud hadnt won further than 7f WinkLaugh


pssst, let you in on a little secret about fillies, atlantic jewel, black caviar, treve, moonlight cloud.....getting the picture? Wink


maybe i should put a bib on you and play eroplanes with your food, your dribbling so much shyt its beyond the joke LaughLaughLaugh
By:
megsy
When: 23 Oct 13 01:06
muck=much

payed=paid Whoops
By:
megsy
When: 23 Oct 13 01:08
still awaiting the mediums top 10 stayers Angry
By:
earlycrow
When: 23 Oct 13 01:51
ima_mazed66 is to this debate what Eddie The Eagle was to Ski Jumping, trying really hard but when the big boys like Megsy step in is found to be along way behind, anyway Megsy has the belt on let's move on
By:
ima_mazed66
When: 23 Oct 13 02:03
Still having trouble retaining info too as I've already cover your pointless 10 stayers thing but how much did Khalid Abdullah get when he sold Frankel to race in Australia?.....Oh wait a minute. Plus exactly how is stating the obvious and saying Abdullah doesn't tend to sell his best horses but holds on to them for breeding make anyone a medium when that's what he's does? You might think that makes me a medium but if you think he sells his best ones (do you think he really needs the money?) then you're clearly a thick! Do you even know what Juddmonte Farms is ffs? Laugh

Look up the names Beat Hollow, Champs Elysees, First Defence, Frankel, Mizzen Mast, Observatory, Oasis Dream and Rail Link and spot the Gr1 races they won and then look up how many Sea Moon and Jet Away won. Then see if you can work out which ones he sold on and which ones he stood at stud.
By:
THERE....IS....NO....SPOOOOON
When: 23 Oct 13 03:14
Canthinkofaclevername

First I want to say I love Aussie racing and watch it whenever I can. However, I do find it difficult to understand the concept of a Group 1 handicap. I understood that the pattern was designed to find the best of the breed, so how can a handicap work with that concept. Isn't it like giving unseeded players in a grand slam tennis tournament a set start?
What does it prove for pattern purposes if horse a beats horse b by a nose but horse a was receiving 10 kilos. Who is the better horse?
Don't get me wrong, I am all for big valuable handicaps, just don't see how they can be called Group 1s.



How refreshing to see someone suggesting they don't understand something and asking genuine questions. Happy

Unlike the two clowns, Sphyncter with his loaded, parochial "questions" and the all knowing, generalising, conclusive

definer of the hypothetical Laugh, ImaMazdaBongoVan.



Cantthinkofaclevername, while you're waiting for an "expert" to respond, I'll offer an opinion.

"Big picture", it's apples and oranges. One sees something as "normal", another sees the same as "unusual".

"Pacemakers" being another good example of different accepted norms.

"Group" Handicaps are just part of the fabric over here. I'm unsure how that's developed but it's been that way for a long

time. I understand that the Group status of a race is reviewed (annually?) and the quality of fields over a period of time

can dictate an upward or downward status grading.



I won't be so pompous as to suggest who's values are "better", it's just a case of differing "norms"...

horses for courses, if you like. Happy

Cheers.
By:
Cantthinkofaclevername
When: 23 Oct 13 03:36
Thanks TINS for your response. It seems like a custom and practice thing. I know they have Grade 1 handicaps in the US but they are handicaps in name only as the weights are set by the track official and there is very little weight difference between the key protagonists. There are some group race handicaps in the UK but the highest level have group 3 status.
I must say I am finding this cheap point scoring on both sides rather childish and tedious. We have been lucky to witness some wonderful horses in recent years, why don't we just delight in their majesty rather than having pointless arguments as to who is better. eg one of the fastest horses I have ever seen was Dayjur but how it would have done against BC no-one will ever know. All we can ever say about a horse is that, at their proven trip, they were the best of their generation.
So can we please end this squabbling.
By:
earlycrow
When: 23 Oct 13 04:07
I agree with Cantthinkofaclevername let's all move on

And to answer his question BC would have won by 2L
By:
megsy
When: 23 Oct 13 05:02
the USA bred Dayjur didnt win many by a fair distance ( 2L ave ), won 7 from 11, 3 group 1's only  and was always ridden out, i would say BC at least 3L as wee willy carson is on record as saying, BC was better, how much better, we never will know.


but then again imamug says all fillies and mares are inferior to male horses Crazy



now im moving on.


ps, frankel wasnt a stayer and im asking to name the top 10 stayers running at the moment, not yesterdayyear Crazy


now im moving on Grin
By:
SecondComing
When: 23 Oct 13 07:19
megsy, in the day to day goings of horse racing it is a proven fact that fillies and mares are inferior, I am not talking about the top liners, I am talking about your everyday racing
By:
J.R.Hartley
When: 23 Oct 13 07:32
The most boring man on the planet v the most clueless mug........what joy......Cry
By:
SecondComing
When: 23 Oct 13 07:33
you best **** off **** i wont hesitate to ****g drop you the first chance you i get you ****
By:
J.R.Hartley
When: 23 Oct 13 08:05
Come down Coming Second......tell Mugsy piles or no piles it's his turn for the vaseline up the crack.....Laugh
By:
megsy
When: 23 Oct 13 09:24
SC...everyone who knows anything about horse racing knows a good colt will always beat a good filly, but i name those few  where there were no colts around good enough to be called a good colt, hence this group of mares beat all comers.

i wasnt saying all fillies



hartley, acka top farrier, ackA socks ( 2 feet lower than a **** )

you seem obcessed with poo jabbing and sound very experiance, should i yell out

"BUMS TO THE WALL WHEN HARTLEYS AROUND !!! Wink
By:
spyker
When: 23 Oct 13 11:01
How refreshing to see someone suggesting they don't understand something and asking genuine questions. Happy

Thing is oh great 1 I've done that - and you amongst others were civil and answered a few of my questions for a few months. However I then made the fateful mistake of saying I though BC would win (at Ascot) but not find it as easy as you lot thought, gave my reasons and was told i was talking nonsense and then watched you amongst others repeat exactly what i had said (as reasons for not looking impressive) but called me an idiot for saying so days earlier!
Ever since then you for 1 have been especially childish towards me and no matter what i say you instantly insult like a true child - please do carry on as it really is very amusing for everyone I'm sure.
Canthinkofausername - it is entirely up to you but I wouldn't bother asking TINS etc for much advice as as soon as you say anything they don't agree with you are an idiot for life - even (as i tried out) if you repeat word for word what 1 of them (tins) said weeks earlier he calls that rubbish if I repeat it! They also seem to find it impossible to tell when one is being serious and obviously taking the p so going over to the aussie forum is like shooting very big fish in a very small barrel a lot of the time and the best thing is they don't know!
By:
ima_mazed66
When: 23 Oct 13 11:33
megsy 23 Oct 13 05:02 

but then again imamug says all fillies and mares are inferior to male horses Crazy


See this is why yo need to stop typing because your grasp of basic English is just too limited and you only end up making yourself look a total d1ckhead.

Here's what I actually said, so load up the printer with paper, print it off and then read it a couple of times or get someone with an understanding of English to explain it to you......I'm sure there are a few kiddies having a kickabout at the park more than able to break it down for you.

ima_mazed66 22 Oct 13 18:23 
as in general the colts tend to beat the fillies and Midday and Sarafina are both fillies, which is the exact reason they get the sex weight allowance and they would have to be exceptional to beat the boys and decent as they were, they weren't exceptional.


LOL...mugsy probably think "in general" has something to do with the military. Laugh

No doubt too he's thinking about the times the (exceptional) fillies beat the colts as if that makes the main point invalid......Oh and Black Caviar wouldn't have lived with Dayjur and you've just embarrasses yourself even more with your Dayjur was always pushed out comments.

Not only have I not said Frankel was a stayer, you've yet to explain the relevance of why you want a 10 stayers list anyway, although if it is to compare with Sea Moon then Sea Moon doesn't race here now so you would have to compare with the ones that were racing here at the same time as he was, whether they still race or not.
By:
THERE....IS....NO....SPOOOOON
When: 23 Oct 13 12:01
Oh and Black Caviar wouldn't have lived with DayjurLaugh The ORACLE strikes again Laugh Cuckoooo Cuckoooo

Do you read what you write? How embarrassing...unless as I suspect, you have an "illness" Cry


Sphyncter and ImaMazdaBongoVan clutching and bleating for respect. Cry

Pathetic.


and sad Sad
By:
spyker
When: 23 Oct 13 12:30
Sphyncter and ImaMazdaBongoVan clutching and bleating for respect. Cry

You see that's the big difference between you and me - you actually think that these forums are places where you can 'earn respect' where you think reputation counts and matters - you actually think you entertain people and have a voice! Your posts show how desperate you are to get cheap laughs and how desperate you are for attention - which you get on the Aussie forum but seem blissfully unaware that for every 1 that chuckles at your nonsense there are more than a few that think you are a tw@.
I, however, am fully aware that my remarks are throwaway, v few people see things as i do and will therefore not agree with me at the time but, i generally get proved right in the long run. I'm aware that more people than not don't laugh at my posts or nec agree with them - it doesn't bother me as forums (to me) are to waste a few minutes here and there - unlike you it is not my life.
Oh and please do carry on calling me 'sphyncter' as without the many hundreds of sphincters in our bodies we would die pretty quickly so you seem to be saying that i am vital to your existence - unless you are so dumb and think it's funny because you think that the only sphincter you've got is where you do most of your talking from. You prob still laugh when somebody is talking abut chickens and says '****' ffs!
Now please go ahead and lets here what immense words of wisdom will come forth - we are all hanging on your every word.......
By:
spyker
When: 23 Oct 13 12:31
c ock
By:
THERE....IS....NO....SPOOOOON
When: 23 Oct 13 12:47
Canthinkofaclevername

First I want to say I love Aussie racing and watch it whenever I can. However, I do find it difficult to understand the concept of a Group 1 handicap. I understood that the pattern was designed to find the best of the breed, so how can a handicap work with that concept. Isn't it like giving unseeded players in a grand slam tennis tournament a set start?
What does it prove for pattern purposes if horse a beats horse b by a nose but horse a was receiving 10 kilos. Who is the better horse?
Don't get me wrong, I am all for big valuable handicaps, just don't see how they can be called Group 1s.


How refreshing to see someone suggesting they don't understand something and asking genuine questions. Happy



Back to school for you, Sphycter. The above is so simple, yet.....so far over your head. Sad

we are all [i]hanging on your every word..


Little grandiose, don't you think?  Don't think anybody else but you ......would be googling, "sphyncter" Laugh
By:
spyker
When: 23 Oct 13 13:07
Good god - you really are truly think aren't you - you think i need to google a misspelling of 'sphincter' to find out about it? What a quaint simpleton you really are - I thought it was an act - please accept my apologies!
Page 2 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com