Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 100 comments are related to the topic:
How Many horses will DIE in todays race in the name of enjoyment

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 100
By:
PHILthePOWER
When: 06 Apr 13 14:29
he says he loves racing but thinks the national is a step too far and is talking shyte. how?
By:
joos
When: 06 Apr 13 14:30
Brilliant betlarge:13.51 post.lol.
By:
millhouse
When: 06 Apr 13 14:36
I would agree that it's uncomfortable viewing at times, but then you have to think that thousands of animals every day are hung up on hooks while still alive, electrocuted and then executed so that they can be on the shelves at Sainsburys the following morning.

That's what's so hypocritical about the antis - they probably devised their latest anti National campaign while eating a round of bacon sandwiches...
By:
PHILthePOWER
When: 06 Apr 13 14:38
But what about the amount of people being slaughtered everyday in Mexico & Syria, does that mean we should do a "survivor" type show with 10 people killing each other?
By:
Trusty
When: 06 Apr 13 14:40
worst still the one's hung up alive and then have their throats cut in the name of religion!
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 06 Apr 13 14:40
Millhouse my son, why hath thou deserted me although you are correct about stringing lowly animals along
By:
Shrewd_dude
When: 06 Apr 13 14:40
What a terrible comparison Phil.
By:
mange
When: 06 Apr 13 14:41
Pitty that the winds dropped............He could have gone outside & pi$$ed against it............
By:
RothmanMike
When: 06 Apr 13 14:43
With all your negativity , I'm surprised you even get out of bed.
You sound like a laugh a minute.
By:
millhouse
When: 06 Apr 13 14:47
Olias, I do share your discomfort about the race to an extent, as I think we all do, but I'm struggling to see why horses lives are more valuable than lambs or calves in the eyes of the antis - if I was going to come back as an animal a racecourse would be pretty high on my list of preferred options...
By:
homefortea
When: 06 Apr 13 14:49
For a site that exists solely for one group of greedy feckers to attempt to take money off another Betfair, attracts its fare share of limp wristed pathetic Liberals.Should you lot not be outside building windfarms or whatever worthy cause is flavour of the month at the moment...
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 06 Apr 13 14:59
I still maintain that all low levels of intelligence should be respected and not abused
By:
bet boy
When: 06 Apr 13 15:16
Who's counting...
By:
Jezebel
When: 06 Apr 13 15:16
Depends on your definition of abuse.  I would maintain, as per my previous post, that racehorses ARE respected.  Better respect and being treated as a horse than fluffy anthropomorphic sentimentality.

There will be more animals diagnosed today with serious long-term medical conditions through mis-management by people who claim to love them but who equate 'love' with treating them like furry humans rather than the animals they are, than there will be horses killed on the racecourse.
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 06 Apr 13 15:22
Lets hope that when racing finishes today everyone on here gets home safely
By:
stu
When: 06 Apr 13 15:31
Point is there could be a happy medium between risk and racing - not a point most seem to be getting on here though.
By:
GODSEND
When: 06 Apr 13 15:41
THERES RISK IN EVERYTHING WE DO... LIFE IS A BIG FAT RISK
By:
posy
When: 06 Apr 13 15:45
Pointless entering into dialogue with Olias....suggest we all ignore him
By:
Shrewd_dude
When: 06 Apr 13 15:47
People are getting it Stu and are making the point we are at a happy medium.
By:
OliasOfSunhillow
When: 06 Apr 13 15:55
Its been a most enjoyable and entertaining exchange, many thanks
By:
Jezebel
When: 06 Apr 13 16:10
On the subject of risk v racing, in 2011 (the last complete year for which I have statistics) 157 out of the 20,714 individual horses (Flat & NH combined) which raced at least once died on the track.  That equates to 0.75%.

The average number of runs per horse was 4.35, so 90,105 starters.  157 fatalities from 90,105 starters equates to 0.17%.

I think most people would accept those figures as low risk.

That's not to minimise the loss of those 157 horses - every one is to be regretted, and the industry hasn't stopped trying to bring that number down even further.
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com