It's the Timeform way. About 10 years ago I saw Jim McGrath doing a preview at Cheltenham on Trials Day. He tipped the fav in every race. If memory serves they all got beat.
It's the Timeform way.About 10 years ago I saw Jim McGrath doing a preview at Cheltenham on Trials Day. He tipped the fav in every race. If memory serves they all got beat.
Thinking outside the obvious, questioning anything, walking at a different beat to the rest of the crowd - none of these things are going to take you anywhere in the racing media.
Look at Clod, he's been freeloading for over forty years by never saying anything contentious, and putting up the favourite in every race ('I tip one in three winners, Mr Sun editor, sir').....
Thinking outside the obvious, questioning anything, walking at a different beat to the rest of the crowd - none of these things are going to take you anywhere in the racing media.Look at Clod, he's been freeloading for over forty years by never sayin
Millhouse any tipster putting up the fav every race will get 33% winners ..why 33% of favs win 67% of em get beat take Alan Keyte tipsters in the Western Mail ( its in the post naps table) 84 winners 60 losers .. P/L -£2.40 in fact the guys in profit about 8 of em could not buy a good bottle of champagne between em .. end of The guys at the bottom of the table well they are the pits
Millhouse any tipster putting up the fav every race will get 33% winners ..why 33% of favs win 67% of em get beat take Alan Keyte tipsters in the Western Mail ( its in the post naps table) 84 winners 60 losers .. P/L -£2.40in fact the
Zipper, the media platforms just forget about the losers and focus on the winners.
99.9% of all 'analysts' on TV and in print are unprofitable, but that doesn't stop them getting paid to regale us all with random noise...
Zipper, the media platforms just forget about the losers and focus on the winners.99.9% of all 'analysts' on TV and in print are unprofitable, but that doesn't stop them getting paid to regale us all with random noise...
I fully agree with you Bishop. I used Timeform extensively in the 1970's and 80's and their ratings and comments were very good in the main. Now I only purchase the 2 annuals from Timeform in order to keep my collection up to date.
I fully agree with you Bishop. I used Timeform extensively in the 1970's and 80's and their ratings and comments were very good in the main. Now I only purchase the 2 annuals from Timeform in order to keep my collection up to date.
Timeform will quickly let you know when a top-rated horse wins a race; however they also say not to blindly back the top-rated horse. They want the best of both worlds!
Timeform will quickly let you know when a top-rated horse wins a race; however they also say not to blindly back the top-rated horse. They want the best of both worlds!
The bloke this morning showed the ratings for the National, and even though On His Own wasn't top-rated he said 'boringly' he was going to side with that horse.
The bloke this morning showed the ratings for the National, and even though On His Own wasn't top-rated he said 'boringly' he was going to side with that horse.
They show the ratings with about 5 ilbs covering the first 20 runners like the Lincoln. Throw in a few Ps or +s as guesses and you've got "Ratings" as good as Timeform.
They show the ratings with about 5 ilbs covering the first 20 runners like the Lincoln.Throw in a few Ps or +s as guesses and you've got "Ratings" as good as Timeform.
Timeform is for Free anything thats for Free... is worth nowt .
you continue to pedal this inaccurate statement....Timeform ratings are NOT free...their best product imo, Computer Timeform, is over a grand a year...the free stuff is massively watered down. HTH.
zipper05 Apr 13 12:30Timeform is for Free anything thats for Free... is worth nowt .you continue to pedal this inaccurate statement....Timeform ratings are NOT free...their best product imo, Computer Timeform, is over a grand a year...the free stuff