What a cocky pr1ck

just unlucky.

lol. ha made his own luck there

How so ?

It's always ridden like that.

left it unsighted the ****

Low sun.

jockey to blame 100%

How exactly was he "unsighted" when he was 3 lengths behind ?

Some dopey feckers on here.

he dont move & loose horses dont fall

how many seconds is 3 lengths?

"How exactly was he "unsighted" when he was 3 lengths behind ?"

skip Specsavers mate you'd be wasting your money. Blind as a bat.

orange flag?.

TALLYWAGGER

Dunno. About one I should think.

Why ?

didn't look 3 lengths to me. anyway on to the next race...

Ok, Duvauchelle. Enlighten me with your superior eyesight and tell how the feck you consider that horse was "unsighted".

I can confirm it was 3 lenghts. 0.63 sec

well ok so after looking at the reply, after I had calmed down he wasnt as close up to the leader as I thought but he still was not 3 lengths behind - 2 at the most,ok so your not blind totally, you just need corrective vision. The reason he was "unsighted" was at 2 lengths behind travelling at near 30mph he was about 1/2 second off the fence directly behind the leader so he wouldnt have seen much of the fence for very long, and he had the horse on the wrong stride.
I have always thought the old measurement was 0.24 secs per length over chases and flat between 0.18 and 0.2

lost count of number reminders,led to a moments hesitation,resulted in tallywaggers unusual title for a thread

reply=replay

0.2 per length on good ground or quicker over jumps
0.25 per length on softer than that over jumps