There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
15 Oct 11
15:56
Joined:
Date Joined:
13 Aug 02
.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 19
|
By:
just unlucky.
|
|
By:
lol. ha made his own luck there
|
|
By:
How so ?
It's always ridden like that. |
|
By:
left it unsighted the ****
|
|
By:
Low sun.
|
|
By:
jockey to blame 100%
|
|
By:
How exactly was he "unsighted" when he was 3 lengths behind ?
Some dopey feckers on here. |
|
By:
he dont move & loose horses dont fall
|
|
By:
how many seconds is 3 lengths?
|
|
By:
"How exactly was he "unsighted" when he was 3 lengths behind ?"
skip Specsavers mate you'd be wasting your money. Blind as a bat. |
|
By:
orange flag?.
|
|
By:
TALLYWAGGER
Dunno. About one I should think. Why ? |
|
By:
didn't look 3 lengths to me. anyway on to the next race...
|
|
By:
Ok, Duvauchelle. Enlighten me with your superior eyesight and tell how the feck you consider that horse was "unsighted".
|
|
By:
I can confirm it was 3 lenghts. 0.63 sec
|
|
By:
well ok so after looking at the reply, after I had calmed down he wasnt as close up to the leader as I thought but he still was not 3 lengths behind - 2 at the most,ok so your not blind totally, you just need corrective vision. The reason he was "unsighted" was at 2 lengths behind travelling at near 30mph he was about 1/2 second off the fence directly behind the leader so he wouldnt have seen much of the fence for very long, and he had the horse on the wrong stride.
I have always thought the old measurement was 0.24 secs per length over chases and flat between 0.18 and 0.2 |
|
By:
lost count of number reminders,led to a moments hesitation,resulted in tallywaggers unusual title for a thread
|
|
By:
reply=replay
|
|
By:
0.2 per length on good ground or quicker over jumps
0.25 per length on softer than that over jumps |