Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 100 comments are related to the topic:
STEWARDS SURELY

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 100
By:
Gowly
When: 02 May 10 15:40
Joke and disgrace..........
By:
in hell
When: 02 May 10 15:40
correct decision

well done stewards
By:
Crawford
When: 02 May 10 15:40
metro john 02 May 15:35

if they turn this around , they might as well rip there rule book up!



Ridiculous comment. It is the rule book that will be upheld if the 2nd gets this.
By:
kennydoomed
When: 02 May 10 15:40
**in bukll **
By:
OVERSEAS
When: 02 May 10 15:40
destroys my weekend......thought it would happen..bugger...
By:
Haslam
When: 02 May 10 15:40
why gowly?
By:
SLB
When: 02 May 10 15:41
Thought they'd have bottled that tbh.
By:
wondersobright
When: 02 May 10 15:41
It's only a surprise because they never do it, doesn't mean they shouldn't have.
By:
Jack Bauer '24'
When: 02 May 10 15:41
Francombe is a good judge. :^0
By:
Crawford
When: 02 May 10 15:41
Now you can toss the rule book.
By:
in hell
When: 02 May 10 15:41
vinnie_roe 02 May 15:38
The bottom line is when queally straightened her, special duty still had every but couldn't go by. There is no way the stewards could be sure that the fav would have won.

it lost by a nose after getting bumped and carried across the track
By:
vinnie_roe
When: 02 May 10 15:41
Do the stewards understand the rules of biritish race? complete farce.
By:
yer ma
When: 02 May 10 15:41
we can expect that every day of the week then can we?
By:
panglima
When: 02 May 10 15:42
Did she say her horse would have won easily if the other horse did not drift over ?
If so a ridiculous comment
By:
alayaday
When: 02 May 10 15:42
was quite a straight forward decision i think, hence why it took so little time to revise
By:
in hell
When: 02 May 10 15:43
agree , very easy call that one
By:
3753 Cruithne
When: 02 May 10 15:43
Surprised it took them so long tbh.
By:
anfieldkings
When: 02 May 10 15:43
i didn't realise initially that there was contact there was a bump and jock did have whip in wrong hand.

i think it was the right decision but have seen much worse cases not dealt with in the same way!
By:
panglima
When: 02 May 10 15:44
66/1 shot thrown out in favour of 9/2 fav, if roles reveresed would they still come to the same conclusion.
By:
art
When: 02 May 10 15:45
very dubious
By:
smartpunter
When: 02 May 10 15:49
ITS A GOOD JOB IT WAS FAV. OTHER WAY ROUND NO CHANCE
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com