Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
bisto
17 Apr 10 21:51
Joined:
Date Joined: 02 Feb 02
| Topic/replies: 144 | Blogger: bisto's blog
Bloodbath today for course layers!The rabbit saves the day round at the paddock.
Pause Switch to Standard View AYR BOOKMAKERS
Show More
Loading...
Report northanlite April 17, 2010 11:12 PM BST
bloodbath? really? henderson winners must have been expensive but outsider won the big one, mixed otherwise surely?
Report Agent G April 17, 2010 11:17 PM BST
14/1 this morning. outsiders were 50+.

winner was also scottish.
Report northanlite April 18, 2010 12:25 AM BST
lol how many punters knew that. i was there very few knew which way round they were going.

very messy by the end of the day. when will these woman realise it is april in scotland not july in the south of france.
Report Wickerman April 18, 2010 12:55 AM BST
Was carnage for the 3 books i spoke to,they had given up after the National.Everyone was wanting to lay Merigo ,it looked far to short ,how wrong could they be.
Report northanlite April 18, 2010 1:02 AM BST
i actually backed merigo for a few quid :) but on here(mind you backed 3 others too). even i was surprised it won tho. can't have been an awful result. gone to lunch placing not great i assume but surely no bloodbath. friday must have gone ok for them too? mind you 4 scottish trained winners.

are bookmakers prone to exaggeration? surely not?
Report adge April 18, 2010 9:56 AM BST
best fairy story tellers going
Report Paddy Mayne April 18, 2010 10:07 AM BST
Why are all the **ey results following me around? :^0
Report wasnot April 18, 2010 10:52 AM BST
Feels like that sometimes Paddy. Decided to leave Donny out last night - 7 race card, 6 winning races plus a 2/7F (level). Fairly typical of my choosing of laste.
Report wasnot April 18, 2010 10:53 AM BST
* late

Cant even get the spelling right :(
Report smurphy April 18, 2010 2:35 PM BST
surprised and disappointed at the number of books who were 1/5 odds in the national at Ayr yesterday
Report immyc April 18, 2010 2:41 PM BST
Ayr Bookies 1/5th Odds and it was a bloodbath, omfg ;-)
Report Paddy Mayne April 18, 2010 3:54 PM BST
Betfair layers offer 1.01 about 10/1 shots. Shock horror scandal...the outraged nation holds it's breath! Yet it happens every day on every race. Do you hear people complaining, or calling them all crooks?


And we weren't ALL 1/5th the odds in thw scottish National. Try looking around a bit! :D
Report REGIT April 18, 2010 3:56 PM BST
3 books at thirsk betting on scottish national all 1/4 1-2-3-4
Report carrig1 April 18, 2010 4:07 PM BST
Well said Paddy
Report razmos April 18, 2010 4:12 PM BST
there must be approx '95% of all punters who haven't a clue about odds be it win or especially e/way .
Report immyc April 18, 2010 4:14 PM BST
All bookmakers should be made to bet to regulation place terms on course, that should be a priority for thr racing for change people then punters would not get stiffed by the**bookies
Report Wickerman April 18, 2010 4:34 PM BST
there must be approx '95% of all punters who haven't a clue about odds be it win or especially e/way .


Would say it was nearer 99% at Ayr yesterday,there was a lot of punters wanting paid place on the third placed horse in every race
Report bisto April 18, 2010 5:04 PM BST
What is a result like,first five favs won alpraham point today,Looks like i will have to sell that grandfather clock half price!!
Report bisto April 18, 2010 5:08 PM BST
Make that six favs!!
Report immyc April 18, 2010 5:24 PM BST
It is because most punters haven't a clue that bookies should be far heavier regulated, to be fair most ring bookies are doing a good job and just want to make a living like anyone else, it is the bad bookies, the big office bookies who manipulate the markets and the hordes of unliscenced tipsters that blight the game. imvho of course
Report bisto April 18, 2010 5:47 PM BST
result last race 5s into 3s,only six favs today.Cant wait for hexham tomorrow!.On a positive note perth for the craic!
Report SHADDER April 18, 2010 5:54 PM BST
BISTO
rabbit needs you to educate him more at them point to points
Report on time April 18, 2010 6:04 PM BST
rabbit needs to get rid of the dinosour he has hanging on.
Report bisto April 18, 2010 6:05 PM BST
SHADDER To be fair he as come on two stone in the last two years!
Report notsure April 18, 2010 6:09 PM BST
BISTO when does rabbits apprentiship finish ?
Report bisto April 18, 2010 6:12 PM BST
NOTSURE,
2011 Overton!!
Report on time April 18, 2010 6:18 PM BST
i had seen the rabbit betting at a trotting meeting 7-8years ago he was standing horses for a nice few pound then i seen him at kelso a year a go with an old bloke on the computer,i think he was a failed bookie and he was stoping rabbit from laying bets, mite of been the old blokes cash.
Report roy777 April 18, 2010 7:01 PM BST
must have been very good in the new betting area round by the paddock.
No 1 in tatts took No 1 pick both days.

£430 EXTRA ON FRIDAY
£750 EXTRA ON SATURDAY

LOOK OUT 2012
Report Racecourse Regular April 18, 2010 7:18 PM BST
roy777? who will be the next course to dare implement such a policy, might come hard to those who have brought up the list in some of the southern rings on the strength of inside info with a view to new betting areas being created, only then to be asked to cough up another £500 a meeting......
Report Sportsadvisor April 18, 2010 7:28 PM BST
Ayr Bookies? Beting to a fifth the odds in large field handicaps like the scots national, now that is a national disgrace!
further, a gutless crew of bookmakers who do not stand up to the track when it moves the ring en bloc to earn itself more cash and sets a bad precedent country wide. sure i'dlike to bet on the 4th floor at Ascot, but it would kill the existing ring.
I have zero respect for those who bet at Ayr
Report THETRUTHHURTS April 18, 2010 7:31 PM BST
RACECOURSE REGULAR..I THINK THE TOTAL OPPOSITE WILL HAPPEN,LESS AND LESS BOOKS ATTENDING MIDWEEK AT THE MO,AND THE REASON BEING,CAN LAY THEM SHORTER SAT AT HOME(LIKE ALL THE UNLICENSED LAYERS ON HERE).RACECOURSES WILL HAVE TO DROP THE PRICE OF THE BADGE TO STAND,FACT.ROLL ON 2012
Report Racecourse Regular April 18, 2010 7:47 PM BST
only problem with that truth is when they are usually shorter on here they are guaranteed tries and win so u end up doing ur dough
Report ribero1 April 18, 2010 8:05 PM BST
agree that what the ayr bookies have done has set a dangerous precedent but from what i believe the racecourse had made the ring so bad that they had very little option and dont think if pick1 doesnt go in then pick 51 wont either,oh and btw they dont pay £750 to then go and give the public a better deal they pay it so they can then bet to 2% a runner to make sure their investment pays off.
Report THETRUTHHURTS April 18, 2010 8:14 PM BST
MIDWEEK FREE ENTERANCE PUBLIC AND BOOKS 1.01
Report roy777 April 18, 2010 8:16 PM BST
racecourse regular

Aintree grand national meeting will be a prime suspect along with the big meetings at YORK, CHESTER, HAYDOCK, DONCASTER etc etc
Report lustrumm April 18, 2010 8:20 PM BST
1/5th the odds in a 30 runner Handicap where they bet to 135 anyway. Come racing
Report roy777 April 18, 2010 8:26 PM BST
ribero

2% per runner = good for bookies
2% per runner = bad for punters
2% per runner = less punters and less money
Report THETRUTHHURTS April 18, 2010 8:29 PM BST
1/4 ODDS PLACE ONCOURSE,EW ON HERE GREAT VALUE NOT...PUT YOUR CLOTHES ON AND COME RACING...
Report THETRUTHHURTS April 18, 2010 8:29 PM BST
PS NO COMMISION,NO PREMIUM CHARGE,COME RACING
Report THETRUTHHURTS April 18, 2010 8:30 PM BST
GOOD LUCK
Report ribero1 April 18, 2010 8:35 PM BST
maybe roy and maybe not especially on big days,personally wish there were no new areas but there will obviously be more if the racecourses think they can sell them,dont blame anyone for going in them if they are there(wish i had last saturday),but just pointing out bookies aint going in them to give anything away so you could argue the racecourses are just as culpable by seeking a few extra quid in giving the paying public a raw deal.
Report wasnot April 18, 2010 8:36 PM BST
I bet on the Scottish National at Newbury. 1/4 Odds 1234. Sounds like the only place it was 1/5th 1234 was at Ayr itself!!!

Even at Newbury they all wanted to be on the winner, all rates from 20/1 down :(
Report wasnot April 18, 2010 8:40 PM BST
1st race at Stratford today I had to go win only, which I dont like to do, especially on a Sunday. Even though there were 7 runners it was 1/7, 8/1, 50/1 bar. I was going to offer 1/4 odds 1-2 and adjust the win odds accordingly but the book next to me went 1/6th odds 1-2 & exploded the prices. What can you do?
Report THETRUTHHURTS April 18, 2010 8:42 PM BST
WASNOT..WOULD IMAGINE THE FIRST RACE WOULD BE A DISASTER FOR MOST OF THE BOOKS..
Report Racecourse Regular April 18, 2010 8:43 PM BST
40-1 & 16-1 winners made up for it am sure
Report wasnot April 18, 2010 8:43 PM BST
I managed to take £7 out of the favourite, and I dont lay on here :(
Report wasnot April 18, 2010 8:44 PM BST
RR - 40/1 came in to silence. 16/1 well backed in the ring (£200 EW laid next door to me).
Report Racecourse Regular April 18, 2010 8:47 PM BST
stratford still good ring wise then wassy?
Report wasnot April 18, 2010 8:48 PM BST
RR - we get on OK with Stratford, but we have some good midlands punters from our dogs days.
Report wasnot April 18, 2010 8:50 PM BST
We also dont fk them about with 1/6th odds and the like.
Report roy777 April 18, 2010 8:51 PM BST
yotally agree with all you say RIBERO.

will probably see less and less bookies when the courses charge premium rates on good days, which could lead to pick values depreciateing in value
Report Racecourse Regular April 18, 2010 8:52 PM BST
roy certain pick numbers yes i.e the high numbers might have the effect of increasing the low numbers even more
Report roy777 April 18, 2010 9:06 PM BST
how many bookmakers do you think would turn up if it was £1000 per pick to bet at AINTREE on grand national day
Report Paddy Mayne April 18, 2010 9:08 PM BST
roy777 18 Apr 20:51
yotally agree with all you say RIBERO.

will probably see less and less bookies when the courses charge premium rates on good days, which could lead to pick values depreciateing in value


I think i see what you are driving at roy.. but surely if less books attend that would increase the value of the picks!
Report roy777 April 18, 2010 9:18 PM BST
if the bookies start betting at 2% per runner this would give the punters a raw deal which could result in less punters attending the meetings, staying at home and using the exchanges
Report wasnot April 18, 2010 9:24 PM BST
The same logic doesnt stop them stiffing the caterers who then have to stiff the public with food & drink prices. Difference is that they have an alternative to betting with the bookmakers. They cant ring for a burger.

Big rents good for those in good picks only. Majority of bookmakers go out of business, course worse off overall, punters MUCH worse off.
Report Paddy Mayne April 18, 2010 9:24 PM BST
Which bookies Roy?

If you added up the percentages available in the ring at Ayr on Sat.. or indeed on virtually ANY racecourse on any day the total would be WELL under 100% in the win book. In many place books it would be nearer 90%.

The value for the punter is still very much on course. No commision, premium charge or repetitive strain syndrome. No £23 available at 36.00 when you wat a onner on! And fresh air and banter to booy!

COME RACING! :)
Report ribero1 April 18, 2010 9:25 PM BST
roy:"this could result in less punters attending the track and staying at home using the exchanges"lol,where have you been for the last 6 or 7 years roy?seriously roy i realise what you are trying to say but i think both the stay at home punters will always stay at home and recegoers will continue to go racing,both having found their levels.
Report wasnot April 18, 2010 9:27 PM BST
How was Donny ribero1? Gave it a swerve as not getting on very well with it at the moment.
Report ribero1 April 18, 2010 9:32 PM BST
we didnt go either wasnot although i understand tatts was ok,much better than last year,24 in tatts,9 on rails which was useless apparently.
Report wasnot April 18, 2010 9:35 PM BST
Last year was hopeless rib, hence the swerve this year. I'm going a week on friday for the Racing For Change effort, but going to swerve it on the Saturday again.
Report ribero1 April 18, 2010 9:35 PM BST
cue 40 books in tatts in 2 weeks time in fairness to donny they seem to be trying re the admissions,£13 in tatts yesterday for a decent card,£10 on some friday afternoons,lets hope last night is the sign of things to come.
Report Sportsadvisor April 18, 2010 9:36 PM BST
so Ayr has made the main ring difficult to bet to? ah, so the solution pay their 750 pounds. perfect. GUTLESS lot. Boycott the place, then see how the track reacts. Apathy will throttle you long before the track does
Report ribero1 April 18, 2010 9:37 PM BST
yes we took 3k last year,but as i say much better last night.
Report Paddy Mayne April 18, 2010 9:42 PM BST
Looked a fair crowd at Stratford in the middle wassy. I was too knackered after 8 hours in the car! :(
Report sugarsteve1 April 18, 2010 9:46 PM BST
11 books in the middle Paddy. I was not one of them.
Report mrspinno April 18, 2010 9:47 PM BST
Must admit that the so called Scottish senior bookies who are trying to create a Scottish association to look after the Scottish books appear to be very shalolow and hypocrytical if you ask me.Only a couple of weeks ago they were downing tools and not attending Ayr racecourse due to the ring shifting towards the hospitality and new areas.These afore mentioned bookies were the first to pay the premier charge by the parade ring!!In some cases occupying two pitches??!Nice one lads!The word fickle and two faced comes to mind.Not only do they want to stop so called south of the border bookies venturing north,they also want to enlighten all other race courses that they can charge want they want on big race days and get the price they want.Nice one lads you cant beat sticking together!
Report wasnot April 18, 2010 9:48 PM BST
Place wasnt buzzing like it is in mid-summer Paddy. Also, dont think they'd have bet you the 7s on in the first out these LOL.

One fun idea they had was kids races on the track. Under 10s and over 10s. Really fun, except the sprint was too far for the under 10s & the winner of the over 10s would have given Linford Christie a race :^0
Report sugarsteve1 April 18, 2010 9:51 PM BST
Wassy.
My boys in training for this event but we are aiming at the under10s in 2017.
He may have a few runs down the field in the preceding years. I do not want to overface him early on.
Report Sportsadvisor April 18, 2010 10:09 PM BST
Must admit that the so called Scottish senior bookies who are trying to create a Scottish association to look after the Scottish books appear to be very shalolow and hypocrytical if you ask me.Only a couple of weeks ago they were downing tools and not attending Ayr racecourse due to the ring shifting towards the hospitality and new areas.These afore mentioned bookies were the first to pay the premier charge by the parade ring!!In some cases occupying two pitches??!Nice one lads!The word fickle and two faced comes to mind.Not only do they want to stop so called south of the border bookies venturing north,they also want to enlighten all other race courses that they can charge want they want on big race days and get the price they want.Nice one lads you cant beat sticking together!
we are poorly led
Report Paddy Mayne April 18, 2010 10:11 PM BST
MrsPinno

Looked like a right result for you when big gal pulled down after the second! :)
Report ribero1 April 18, 2010 10:15 PM BST
we are not poorly led at all,kj and others are working incredibly hard for us all,they have absolutely no power to stop bookmakers acting independantly,sa i often agree with your comments although most are critical of bookies,dont know who you are but you are way off mark here imo.
Report Sportsadvisor April 18, 2010 10:51 PM BST
ribero. i fundamentally disagree. kj for example leads with 1/5 the odds on 16-21 runner handicaps. whatever the arguments for this, in his (and those alike) they ignore the constant complaints from our customers, and have introduced an unlevel playing field against leading books such as my own, who lay substantial bets at regular terms
It's certainly true to say it's often difficult to lead such a selfish group, but said leader and others who set themselves up as leaders, should be more vocal else they are so many sheep. we lack the strength at the top
Report ribero1 April 18, 2010 11:05 PM BST
we will have to agree to differ sa,kj works tremendously hard and we are lucky to have him,anyhow not really the place for this talk,good luck and goodnight all.
Report wasnot April 18, 2010 11:27 PM BST
kj for example leads with 1/5 the odds on 16-21 runner handicaps. whatever the arguments for this, in his (and those alike) they ignore the constant complaints from our customers

I do 1/5 odds in 16-22 runner h'caps & I do bigger odds than those who offer 1/4. I get zero complaints from my customers and my turnover is increasing. The only ones who bleat are the stay at home "punters" one here.

I also have zero complaints about kj. If you knew the amount of work that goes on behind the scenes by kj, bj & rg you would get a shock. There are not many in this game you could trust with bookmakers livelihoods. I trust kj.
Report jimnast April 19, 2010 8:17 AM BST
regarding ayr on saturday plenty of books bet 1st 4 1/4 on the national ,yet as ever this forum is lead to believe otherwise.
Report mrspinno April 19, 2010 9:17 AM BST
I have found KJ to be the fairest man in the job i have seen.It is probably a labour of love but the main thing i have noticed with him is that he has all bookies interest at heart,opposed to certain so called committee members looking after there own a*rse.As a bookie with average numbers there is nothing worse in my view,with people who are supposed to be looking after the majority do things for there own ends meet.In my view KJ sees the overall picture and is endevouring to look after all bookies objectives.
Report Sportsadvisor April 19, 2010 3:20 PM BST
we agree to disagree lads, especially as it's apparent you offer a fifth on large field handicaps and the complaints of punters about the same hold little merit to you. Personally I see little future in blundering on with terms the public dislike- regardless of the argument that they are better off on the win book(and my win odds are no worse at a 1/4 than those betting to a 1/5). At the end of the day-only the bookies know how betfair prices a race up- and it's those same bookies hell**on taking every penny available to convey it on here that are the problem. I'll sign up to the initiative from RFC and we'll see how you match up then!
Report foxy April 19, 2010 4:32 PM BST
as already stated theres plenty betting full place odds just have a look around.
Report carrig1 April 19, 2010 5:19 PM BST
Yes foxy, thats true.

Like anything else, punters should go for the best value. Its not rocket science.
Report foxy April 19, 2010 5:25 PM BST
the ones who come on here carrig dont wont value they just wont to have a moan.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com