|
By:
I beleieve it didn't crossed the post! So it should deemed as a non-runner. but the whole world is full of cr oo^s, so i am afraid its hard to get your money m8.
|
|
By:
Ridiculous. It should not be deemed as a non-runner because it was under orders. It should be deemed as runner but refused to race.
|
|
By:
honestly if anyone bet it they r entitled to lose there dough.....thats the rules...end of
|
|
By:
what if the bookies enforced a 4p R4 to all winning bets
how many complaints would we have... it lost..its a loser...a losing bet if you get your stake back OK consider yourself lucky,and the bookies generous... |
|
By:
Its a grey area.
|
|
By:
carberry was gutted
|
|
By:
The ** horse ran. It had the same chance as the other 39.
Unlucky. Stop trying to get something you dont deserve |
|
By:
Jockey should have made the decision,cost myself a lot of money and many many others too!
|
|
By:
Who do you work for Trent? Done your dough, boss not happy?
How can King Johns Castle have had the same chance as any other horse in the race given that he didn't have a jockey on board? Fair enough, the rule is clear, but any firms that don't refund must (a) have done bundles on the race and (b) have taken plenty on the beast - to me it goes to show that previous 'ex gratia' payments are pure publicity stunts cos they haven't laid anything of note on the fúcker in question. Further, in future they don't deserve the once a year/ occasional business that might become more regular that the race attracts. Good on JC and VC. |
|
By:
Didnt have a jockey on board!!!! Where the Feck do you get that from?
Carberry was sat on it looking a tw@t when they jumped. Just sick of having moaning b@stards who lose and then want something for nothing. |
|
By:
can i have my money back off abbeybraney please i think i was treated as shabbily but oh well life goes on and ill try again next year
|
|
By:
did you lay it trent?
|