Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
amanda
10 Apr 10 20:21
Joined:
Date Joined: 02 Mar 04
| Topic/replies: 126 | Blogger: amanda's blog
can anyone please tell me any firms returning stakes on king johns castle

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 51
By:
GT
When: 10 Apr 10 20:24
v i k t o r
k o r al s
By:
amanda
When: 10 Apr 10 20:26
thank you but backed e/w with 365
By:
718
When: 10 Apr 10 20:29
Give 'em a call and BEG them for your money back!

I have know idea what reason you can give them. JUst BEG.
By:
GT
When: 10 Apr 10 20:31
v i k t o r - confirmed yes
k o r al s - confirmed yes
b 3 6 5 - ?
l ad cr ook s - ?
b i l ly mountains - ?
b a ld fr ed - ?
p a t po we r - ?
By:
amanda
When: 10 Apr 10 20:32
ok no harm in asking,
can only say no
By:
mange
When: 10 Apr 10 20:33
will prob be "up to " in a mo
By:
718
When: 10 Apr 10 20:36
v i k t o r - confirmed yes Victor Chandler
k o r al s - confirmed yes Coral
b 3 6 5 - ? Bet 365
l ad cr ook s - ? Lads
b i l ly mountains - ? William Hill
b a ld fr ed - ? Bet Fred
p a t po we r - ? Paddy Power
By:
mug
When: 10 Apr 10 20:37
No refunds from the** at crybet or blu-e s-quare.
By:
throughother
When: 10 Apr 10 20:42
3.65 did not refund that is a joke
By:
amanda
When: 10 Apr 10 20:51
i think its a disgrace, backed t.woods at 11/2 will have to collect that on sunday night, and tell them where to stick there account,
By:
Diamond_Joe_Quimby
When: 10 Apr 10 20:52
why should they refund, horse refused to race, same as refusing at a fence. Punters fault if they did their dough.
By:
Trent BJK
When: 10 Apr 10 20:52
Why?

Because you want your money back for something you lost on?

Not their fault the horse didnt run. Stop Scrounging and take your hit
By:
amanda
When: 10 Apr 10 20:56
just wondered why they should not pay back,as they have refunded 4 the same thing b4 as have other firms,
By:
Filthyho
When: 10 Apr 10 21:02
Trent BJK 10 Apr 20:52
Why?

Because you want your money back for something you lost on?

Not their fault the horse didnt run. Stop Scrounging and take your hit

They backed an Horse in HORSE RACE did it race? NO

they should get their money back
By:
Duncster
When: 10 Apr 10 21:05
Crazy rule! The horse was never going to run
By:
mange
When: 10 Apr 10 21:09
at the end of the day it TAKES out thebook ......public relations to refund
By:
mrcombustible
When: 10 Apr 10 21:27
Asked 365 for a refund, they said no
By:
Filthyho
When: 10 Apr 10 21:29
i had no bet, But personally id boycott anywhere that doesnt refund very poor customer service not giving stakes back on a horse that you backed to race and it had no intentions of racing it was dragged to the line! like buying a tv online and receiving an empty box...
By:
GetReal
When: 10 Apr 10 21:30
Bookies not refunding over a ''refused to race'' is a disgrace, but a bigger one is not refunding over ''refused to win.''
By:
darkie returns
When: 10 Apr 10 21:32
ive just got my 365 betback as a bonus bet for the stake. i must be a lob!!!!!!
By:
Shrewd_dude
When: 10 Apr 10 21:35
A lot of people upset because they backed a loser. I should ask for my stake back on Erics charm aswell. Refused to jump a fence properly.
By:
mange
When: 10 Apr 10 21:38
jumped it too well
By:
Sheikh Handsman Al Mac's Tomb
When: 10 Apr 10 21:40
28-1 shot and no refund? Terrible PR from the big firms, the once a year punter should just double up on the lottery this day next year, atleast that helps good causes.
By:
darkie returns
When: 10 Apr 10 21:42
i agree shrewd dude, but its worth a try. erics had no chance, king j would have won btw
By:
theresbeenagoal
When: 10 Apr 10 21:43
Shrewd_dude 10 Apr 21:35


A lot of people upset because they backed a loser. I should ask for my stake back on Erics charm aswell. Refused to jump a fence properly.



To be fair, yours had a jockey on it when they formed a line!

Makes sense for firms to refund as a free bet if they don't want to give the dough, I'd settle for that.
By:
dewey
When: 10 Apr 10 21:44
THE RULE IS -' UNDER STARTERS ORDERS' - IT DID - SIMPLE..........LOSER!
By:
Shrewd_dude
When: 10 Apr 10 21:50
But even if you have no jockey the rule has to be 'under starters orders' otherwise you are going to have cases in flat racing where the jockey comes off when the stall opens. Whether or not some or all bookies pay out for PR reasons or not the people saying the rule is a disgrace/con etc. and should be changed are talking rubbish.
By:
theresbeenagoal
When: 10 Apr 10 21:51
And any firm that wishes to apply the rules are within their rights to do so ... not the point. Those who have the ability to see the bigger picture will surely refund in some form though, and those that have shops competing with JC's will have to.
By:
roborant
When: 10 Apr 10 21:58
theresbeenagoal is absolutely right. Those of us who have a bet every day can take the hit and understand. The once a year punters who presumably bookies want to attract to bet more regularly will see it as a rip off. Not even ran a yard for their money.
By:
Filthyho
When: 10 Apr 10 22:41
Shrewd_dude 10 Apr 21:35
A lot of people upset because they backed a loser. I should ask for my stake back on Erics charm aswell. Refused to jump a fence properly.


Stupid comment to be honest mate,the horse you back actually did RACE,this thread is about a horse that never even moved it DID get dragged to the line
By:
Shrewd_dude
When: 10 Apr 10 22:45
Got dragged to the line because rather than pull it out the Jockey, trainer, connections etc. wanted it to take its chance and it did so it just refused to race and take that chance. It was given every chance but maybe they should have just pulled it before it went under starters orders so that you could get your money back when it was declared a non-runner. How selfish of connections.
By:
Filthyho
When: 10 Apr 10 22:49
Thats most likely the case unfortunately feel sorry for anyone who had money on it,just remember seeing some old geezer in a suit ragging him to the line,the jockey looked as though he had given up...
By:
thegalwayman
When: 10 Apr 10 23:00
That 'old geezer' was the great Arthur Moore. I genuinely felt for him when the horse refused to race.
By:
Filthyho
When: 10 Apr 10 23:02
i think tonight alot of people wont be thinking hes so great
By:
youresomean
When: 10 Apr 10 23:05
in foinavons grand national all losing bets should have been refunded.
the other horses didn't have a chance to jump the fence.
By:
thegalwayman
When: 10 Apr 10 23:25
You're an idiot.
By:
Filthyho
When: 10 Apr 10 23:26
me?
By:
thegalwayman
When: 10 Apr 10 23:49
Yes.
By:
Filthyho
When: 11 Apr 10 00:08
because i didnt know who somebody is? seriously pretty pathetic comment
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com