Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
MaxED
10 Apr 10 17:04
Joined:
Date Joined: 26 Dec 03
| Topic/replies: 691 | Blogger: MaxED's blog
JOKE.
You have a bet pre-race, you take your chances...if it doesn't wanna run, just the same as a faller imo.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 51
By:
Crisp77
When: 10 Apr 10 17:05
The horse didn't seem to be moat-ivated :^0
By:
PMac
When: 10 Apr 10 17:05
Err it didn't race, joke rule
By:
mtj101
When: 10 Apr 10 17:05
can't fu-king believe it.
By:
Dan Chipowski
When: 10 Apr 10 17:06
Arthur Moore's face was priceless :^0
By:
SIR DEREK TROTTER
When: 10 Apr 10 17:06
yes pathetic rule it did not run so u should get ur money back. we know we wont coz the bookies are greedy tw@ts.
By:
[x] These checkboxes suck
When: 10 Apr 10 17:07
yes :^0
By:
subaru
When: 10 Apr 10 17:07
quite right, i backed it and knew my fate...any nice gesture from the bookies would be great but i dont expect anything.
By:
DHB
When: 10 Apr 10 17:10
Personally, I think it should settled as a loser.
By:
milesthemouse
When: 10 Apr 10 17:12
so these bookies that are greedy tw@ts, are all betfair layers giving money back. get a life
By:
Billy Jay
When: 10 Apr 10 17:18
there was a new rule brought in this year allowing the starter to announce that a horse is withdrawn even if it has come under starters orders
By:
SIR DEREK TROTTER
When: 10 Apr 10 17:19
the horse did not run u d1ckweed , if a horse pulled out 2 mins before the race u would get ur money back, the horse lined up but did not run its a stupid rule to favour the bookies. if u dont agree then i guess ur a bookie.
By:
Wickett
When: 10 Apr 10 17:21
Of course it's a loser!!

If the 2 favs and numerous others refused to start and King Johns won you'd be the sort of fools that wouldn't want a rule 4 to apply either!
By:
corbiewood
When: 10 Apr 10 17:21
horse didnt run cos its a big fluffy yak.

youve done yer money, accept it and move on.
By:
milesthemouse
When: 10 Apr 10 17:22
I backed it on betfair I dont want my money back
By:
Wickett
When: 10 Apr 10 17:22
How is it in favour of the bookie u idiot!? They'd much rather it won and beat the fav...
I thank my lucky stars that most punters r thick!
By:
SIR DEREK TROTTER
When: 10 Apr 10 17:23
i see all the bookies are popping up ;)
By:
corbiewood
When: 10 Apr 10 17:23
SIR DEREK TROTTER 10 Apr 17:23
i see all the bookies are popping up ;)


deal with it.
By:
milesthemouse
When: 10 Apr 10 17:24
Bookie no, but your obviously a losing punter life time. The bookines will probably give you your money back as a concession. They wouldn't want to lose you as a customer
By:
Shrewd_dude
When: 10 Apr 10 17:24
It should be a loser. If not it means Bookies could apply a rule 4. I for one would be furious if I had backed a winner and they applied a 50p Rule 4 because the even money fav refused to run or leave the stalls. It was given the chance to run so is a loser.
By:
milesthemouse
When: 10 Apr 10 17:25
SIR BELL END TROTTER
By:
Wickett
When: 10 Apr 10 17:25
Mugs like Trotter will be back regardless!
By:
SIR DEREK TROTTER
When: 10 Apr 10 17:25
Wickett 10 Apr 17:22


How is it in favour of the bookie u idiot!? They'd much rather it won and beat the fav...
I thank my lucky stars that most punters r thick!

dear o dear how is it in favour for the bookie eeerrrr let me think , u put money on a horse that dont run and u lose ur money without even having a chance , i think this favours the bookie just a tad.
By:
corbiewood
When: 10 Apr 10 17:26
SIR DEREK TROTTER 10 Apr 17:25
Wickett 10 Apr 17:22


How is it in favour of the bookie u idiot!? They'd much rather it won and beat the fav...
I thank my lucky stars that most punters r thick!

dear o dear how is it in favour for the bookie eeerrrr let me think , u put money on a horse that dont run and u lose ur money without even having a chance , i think this favours the bookie just a tad.

you ve missed his point you no mark.

away with ye, accept it and move on.
By:
SIR DEREK TROTTER
When: 10 Apr 10 17:27
:^0 ha ha here they all come, i really dont give a toss either way , my main bet was state of play, just keep paying the winners and i,ll worry about my losers :^0
By:
Shrewd_dude
When: 10 Apr 10 17:27
Non-runner. Horse never has a chance of winning so money back and rule 4 may apply.

Refusing to run had a chance of winning never took it so losing bet but no rule 4.
By:
Wickett
When: 10 Apr 10 17:28
u hav just shown your utter ignorance!
If it had been the only horse they had taken money on it would favour the bookie. They would rather it had run given the result.
If u do not understand this then please be quiet. This kis an adult forum.
By:
corbiewood
When: 10 Apr 10 17:28
of course it was, i had the tricast aswell.

silyl trotter.
By:
Roge
When: 10 Apr 10 17:29
it is the rules so fair enough not getting your cash back but it is a a complete sham

no way you should lose your money in that situation
By:
coffeedodger
When: 10 Apr 10 17:29
Horse never had a chance of winning if it had been a too horse race! What's it matter if you lose your money after onw second or one minute? :)
By:
coffeedodger
When: 10 Apr 10 17:30
or even a two horse race..... long day!
By:
SIR DEREK TROTTER
When: 10 Apr 10 17:30
no wickett ur missing the point im afraid, never mind u have ur point of view and i,ll have mine. imo only a mug would bet with a bookie.
if ur willing to lay it on ere at a good price then fair play to the layers.
By:
Diamond_Joe_Quimby
When: 10 Apr 10 17:31
Its a loser, no money should be given back imho.
He approached the flag. Tape went up and horse REFUSED.
By:
Diamond_Joe_Quimby
When: 10 Apr 10 17:31
The look on Arthur Moores face though :^0
By:
Wickett
When: 10 Apr 10 17:33
I'll agree I'm right! I don't mind the rule... What happens when a horse has a history of doing it? It's factored into the price....

At the end of the day, they are the rules. You know this when u place a bet... Noone is holding a gun to your head...

'Mine fell - I want my money back';!!! Same thing!
By:
ilnmar
When: 10 Apr 10 17:40
Yes I work for VeeCee

Just to clarify

ALL bets on King John Castle have been voided, inc A Post
We paid out on the 5th
We gave money back see t and c's for fallers etc
And we bet to nearly 20% under the industry SP for the duration of the Show

Off to the pub in the sun

Have a good evening all ;)
By:
Stark
When: 10 Apr 10 17:42
It came under orders.

It's a LOSER.

Deal with it and stop F&CK1NG WHINING!!!!!
By:
theresbeenagoal
When: 10 Apr 10 18:03
I take it a few on this thread work for rival firms to VC and JC, are licking their wounds after a shocking result and don't want to give any back. I wouldn't want to work in a shop that wasn't refunding ... :-)
By:
MattA
When: 10 Apr 10 18:30
Got to agree it's a bit of a p*ss take not voiding the bets
By:
tambhoy5
When: 10 Apr 10 18:34
starter needs b uggered imo.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com