Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
JOKE.
You have a bet pre-race, you take your chances...if it doesn't wanna run, just the same as a faller imo.
You have a bet pre-race, you take your chances...if it doesn't wanna run, just the same as a faller imo.
Show More
yes pathetic rule it did not run so u should get ur money back. we know we wont coz the bookies are greedy tw@ts.
quite right, i backed it and knew my fate...any nice gesture from the bookies would be great but i dont expect anything.
so these bookies that are greedy tw@ts, are all betfair layers giving money back. get a life
there was a new rule brought in this year allowing the starter to announce that a horse is withdrawn even if it has come under starters orders
the horse did not run u d1ckweed , if a horse pulled out 2 mins before the race u would get ur money back, the horse lined up but did not run its a stupid rule to favour the bookies. if u dont agree then i guess ur a bookie.
Of course it's a loser!!
If the 2 favs and numerous others refused to start and King Johns won you'd be the sort of fools that wouldn't want a rule 4 to apply either!
If the 2 favs and numerous others refused to start and King Johns won you'd be the sort of fools that wouldn't want a rule 4 to apply either!
horse didnt run cos its a big fluffy yak.
youve done yer money, accept it and move on.
youve done yer money, accept it and move on.
How is it in favour of the bookie u idiot!? They'd much rather it won and beat the fav...
I thank my lucky stars that most punters r thick!
I thank my lucky stars that most punters r thick!
SIR DEREK TROTTER 10 Apr 17:23
i see all the bookies are popping up ;)
deal with it.
i see all the bookies are popping up ;)
deal with it.
Bookie no, but your obviously a losing punter life time. The bookines will probably give you your money back as a concession. They wouldn't want to lose you as a customer
It should be a loser. If not it means Bookies could apply a rule 4. I for one would be furious if I had backed a winner and they applied a 50p Rule 4 because the even money fav refused to run or leave the stalls. It was given the chance to run so is a loser.
Wickett 10 Apr 17:22
How is it in favour of the bookie u idiot!? They'd much rather it won and beat the fav...
I thank my lucky stars that most punters r thick!
dear o dear how is it in favour for the bookie eeerrrr let me think , u put money on a horse that dont run and u lose ur money without even having a chance , i think this favours the bookie just a tad.
How is it in favour of the bookie u idiot!? They'd much rather it won and beat the fav...
I thank my lucky stars that most punters r thick!
dear o dear how is it in favour for the bookie eeerrrr let me think , u put money on a horse that dont run and u lose ur money without even having a chance , i think this favours the bookie just a tad.
SIR DEREK TROTTER 10 Apr 17:25
Wickett 10 Apr 17:22
How is it in favour of the bookie u idiot!? They'd much rather it won and beat the fav...
I thank my lucky stars that most punters r thick!
dear o dear how is it in favour for the bookie eeerrrr let me think , u put money on a horse that dont run and u lose ur money without even having a chance , i think this favours the bookie just a tad.
you ve missed his point you no mark.
away with ye, accept it and move on.
Wickett 10 Apr 17:22
How is it in favour of the bookie u idiot!? They'd much rather it won and beat the fav...
I thank my lucky stars that most punters r thick!
dear o dear how is it in favour for the bookie eeerrrr let me think , u put money on a horse that dont run and u lose ur money without even having a chance , i think this favours the bookie just a tad.
you ve missed his point you no mark.
away with ye, accept it and move on.
:^0 ha ha here they all come, i really dont give a toss either way , my main bet was state of play, just keep paying the winners and i,ll worry about my losers :^0
Non-runner. Horse never has a chance of winning so money back and rule 4 may apply.
Refusing to run had a chance of winning never took it so losing bet but no rule 4.
Refusing to run had a chance of winning never took it so losing bet but no rule 4.
u hav just shown your utter ignorance!
If it had been the only horse they had taken money on it would favour the bookie. They would rather it had run given the result.
If u do not understand this then please be quiet. This kis an adult forum.
If it had been the only horse they had taken money on it would favour the bookie. They would rather it had run given the result.
If u do not understand this then please be quiet. This kis an adult forum.
of course it was, i had the tricast aswell.
silyl trotter.
silyl trotter.
it is the rules so fair enough not getting your cash back but it is a a complete sham
no way you should lose your money in that situation
no way you should lose your money in that situation
Horse never had a chance of winning if it had been a too horse race! What's it matter if you lose your money after onw second or one minute? :)
no wickett ur missing the point im afraid, never mind u have ur point of view and i,ll have mine. imo only a mug would bet with a bookie.
if ur willing to lay it on ere at a good price then fair play to the layers.
if ur willing to lay it on ere at a good price then fair play to the layers.
Its a loser, no money should be given back imho.
He approached the flag. Tape went up and horse REFUSED.
He approached the flag. Tape went up and horse REFUSED.
I'll agree I'm right! I don't mind the rule... What happens when a horse has a history of doing it? It's factored into the price....
At the end of the day, they are the rules. You know this when u place a bet... Noone is holding a gun to your head...
'Mine fell - I want my money back';!!! Same thing!
At the end of the day, they are the rules. You know this when u place a bet... Noone is holding a gun to your head...
'Mine fell - I want my money back';!!! Same thing!
Yes I work for VeeCee
Just to clarify
ALL bets on King John Castle have been voided, inc A Post
We paid out on the 5th
We gave money back see t and c's for fallers etc
And we bet to nearly 20% under the industry SP for the duration of the Show
Off to the pub in the sun
Have a good evening all ;)
Just to clarify
ALL bets on King John Castle have been voided, inc A Post
We paid out on the 5th
We gave money back see t and c's for fallers etc
And we bet to nearly 20% under the industry SP for the duration of the Show
Off to the pub in the sun
Have a good evening all ;)
It came under orders.
It's a LOSER.
Deal with it and stop F&CK1NG WHINING!!!!!
It's a LOSER.
Deal with it and stop F&CK1NG WHINING!!!!!
I take it a few on this thread work for rival firms to VC and JC, are licking their wounds after a shocking result and don't want to give any back. I wouldn't want to work in a shop that wasn't refunding ... :-)
Got to agree it's a bit of a p*ss take not voiding the bets
When I saw PC chasing after KJC the second time I thought he was auditioning for a new Weetabix Ad
big boys unlikely to refund as they did their nuts on the race.
probably still queuing up to get paid out.
probably still queuing up to get paid out.
i saw it refunded in my local indo
surprised neither powers and spoils didnt refund
prob took actual money on it this time and fancy hanging on to it
surprised neither powers and spoils didnt refund
prob took actual money on it this time and fancy hanging on to it
365 havent refunded i backed it with em. only right though its under orders ita a loser
The Chain 10 Apr 19:46
356 are Good eggs.
Are you telling me that? :)
356 are Good eggs.
Are you telling me that? :)
small crumbs of comfort for backers knowing they're not getting a refund 'cos their bookie got a right doing on the race.
The starter was incompetent bringing it under orders. It never looked like it wanted to race. Making a 155% book and not refunding on a drifting 25/1 shot is disgusting.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539