Forums

Greyhounds

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 43 comments are related to the topic:
Bookmakers stung as greyhound betting scam beats the Racing Post.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 43
By:
sparrow
When: 10 Apr 20 19:48
Come on now wedge I must have seen a dozen threads on here complaining about this very subject. Anyway, if you think it makes no difference then fair enough.
By:
HGS
When: 10 Apr 20 20:08
When it's p1ssing down, some tracks heavily favour the outside traps. Sunderland the best example of this imo. Can only assume with these tracks the water drains to the centre of the track, therefore making the inside 'heavy' for want of  a better term. A heavily bowsered track could easily replicate this if need be. Just my opinion.
By:
RothmanMike
When: 12 Apr 20 16:12
At Hackney Wick on a Saturday morning, I used to go over to look at the back straight.
On the finishing side, the inside would look fast but down the back it was watered heavy.
As a rule, one should not bet on the first few races, until a bias is shown.
That having been said, I only backed in the Open Marathons which were usually very late
on the card. Also bias meant nothing to the likes of Salina, Poor Sue et al.
By:
seaside
When: 14 Apr 20 11:14
Scurlogue when he run at Harringay the first time one of the faces said this is some dog put your money on it will not get beat.

After the first lap we all looked at him and thought what a pcik putting us on this thing needless to say second time around he took off and we all looked at one another and said wow what a dog.

You would have had to have been there to fully appreciate how fast he was traveling down that back straight.
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com