Just a heads up for anyone playing tonight that they'd done away with the 8 dog traps last weekend and are using the curved front (proper traps) and the traps are sited bang in the middle of the track.
IT is all change for Racing Post Greyhound TV when it returns on Tuesday for the first show of the week with a new home on the FrontRunner channel on Sky 468 and Freesat 250. Streaming remains as before via http://greyhoundbet.racingpost.com/ plus partner websites.
Cheers for the INFO PSAlso, from the RP site: IT is all change for Racing Post Greyhound TV when it returns on Tuesday for the first show of the week with a new home on the FrontRunner channel on Sky 468 and Freesat 250. Streaming remains as before
fear not bg they know they've dropped a huge b0llock with this track, they just won't admit it, or at least haven't so far...at least this is a start
lets see if a 500 trip is created and the bends are tightened and banked then they have a chance of turning a mickey mouse crock of sh1te into a reasonably credible track
fear not bg they know they've dropped a huge b0llock with this track, they just won't admit it, or at least haven't so far...at least this is a startlets see if a 500 trip is created and the bends are tightened and banked then they have a chance of t
watched the show this morning...they said these are the 500 boxes and the current 480 boxes are just being refurbished
so basically the 8 dog sh1te is here to stay and now they have 2 types of boxes at the track and have 2 standard trips FCK OFF UTTER SH1THOLE
watched the show this morning...they said these are the 500 boxes and the current 480 boxes are just being refurbishedso basically the 8 dog sh1te is here to stay and now they have 2 types of boxes at the track and have 2 standard trips FCK OFF UTTE
I've been told that the GBGB specified the minimum radius of the bends that were acceptable. Any new track (no chance, I know) would be built like Towcester, long bends and short straights, unless you had a standard of say 550.
I've been told that the GBGB specified the minimum radius of the bends that were acceptable. Any new track (no chance, I know) would be built like Towcester, long bends and short straights, unless you had a standard of say 550.
minimum radius of the bends that is acceptable for new tracks...are they implying that some (most??) current tracks have an unacceptable design??
interesting moral stance
minimum radius of the bends that is acceptable for new tracks...are they implying that some (most??) current tracks have an unacceptable design??interesting moral stance
Track needs something done ,u get the aerial view everything thing looks ok ,but its blatant bunny dog bias, the racing is actually boring Look at the back 3 dogs 95% of races they go no where 480 trip
Track needs something done ,u get the aerial view everything thing looks ok ,but its blatant bunny dog bias, the racing is actually boring Look at the back 3 dogs 95% of races they go no where 480 trip
As a watching spectator sport the game will be finished
It's an awful track which should be dug up and started again
Savva started to blown the tracks trumpet when it first opened
Then he must hsve released what a mess it is, this can ve backed up by his many runners he has st the track
Also according to Kevin Boothby at henlow on Sunday savva will rtsrting his two new litters at henlow soon sngd not Towcester
Again that tells you all you need to know
If the derby is run at Towcestor in the futureAs a watching spectator sport the game will be finishedIt's an awful track which should be dug up and started againSavva started to blown the tracks trumpet when it first openedThen he must hsve released
They know they have to alter the track if they want to run the derby.
But if they can make alterations that are acceptable surely supporting Towcester with the derby is the best way for the sport to move forward.
If they prove successful then why wouldnt the like of Kempton/Chelmsford potentially do something similar.
Unless that happens there wont be any new tracks anywhere.
They know they have to alter the track if they want to run the derby.But if they can make alterations that are acceptable surely supporting Towcester with the derby is the best way for the sport to move forward.If they prove successful then why would
The problem you got is captain its all bends and too short straights and it's too wide
The hare runs around the outside of the track so it's hard to easily change anything cheaply
I gues you could leave the hard rail where it and and try and re shape the track by bringing the inside rails outwards to narrow the circuit and at the same time make the straights longer
Whether its possible to achieve this with leaving the outside rail mechanism untouched I doubt it
The problem you got is captain its all bends and too short straights and it's too wideThe hare runs around the outside of the track so it's hard to easily change anything cheaply I gues you could leave the hard rail where it and and try and re shape
Although if the trip was 500m with a chute it would be a good run to the bend.
After that I have no problem with it being hard to pass front runners, the derby should reward early pace imo, especially if it was over 500m.
Sure ravage.Although if the trip was 500m with a chute it would be a good run to the bend.After that I have no problem with it being hard to pass front runners, the derby should reward early pace imo, especially if it was over 500m.