At the moment Coventry is not eligible to receive grants from the fund, into which Betfair pay a percentage of turnover. Unless Betfair paid something directly to the track, Coventry wouldn't want markets to be carried on here.
At the moment Coventry is not eligible to receive grants from the fund, into which Betfair pay a percentage of turnover. Unless Betfair paid something directly to the track, Coventry wouldn't want markets to be carried on here.
Ian are you saying Coventry dont get added prizemoney(added prizemoney comes from levy)?And if so what possible reason could the BGRF give for not giving Coventry it when every other track recieves it? Or is it just improvement grants your talking about which imo no tracks should get anyway?
Ian are you saying Coventry dont get added prizemoney(added prizemoney comes from levy)?And if so what possible reason could the BGRF give for not giving Coventry it when every other track recieves it?Or is it just improvement grants your talking abo
The link below should help beebs.Basically as far as im aware all the income is levy appart from a small amount of trainers fees and registration fees etc.
Basically most goes to prizemoney,closelly followed by welfare and then a big step down to stadia grants and track safety and trainers assistance funds etc etc.
Like i said if Coventry get BGRF added prizemoney then they are getting from the fund.However i noticed Ian did write "grants" which im not sure he/Coventry can expect any sympathy for,after all Harry is a big supporter of groups who are activelly trying to stop those grants???
The link below should help beebs.Basically as far as im aware all the income is levy appart from a small amount of trainers fees and registration fees etc.http://www.bgrf.org.uk/main-areas-of-expenditure-2009-2012/Basically most goes to prizemoney,cl
Agree Beebs.Until Harry drops his tote revolution ideas and starts to embrace an exchange or bookies it is doomed to fail.Feel abit guilty sitting ready to watch it without having a bet on it.
I love what he is trying to do but it just isnt viable.Punters need to be allowed to win but with the UK being so small even a universal tote system wouldnt work imo.The exchange model is the way to go but without greedy shareholders taking money from winners.
Agree Beebs.Until Harry drops his tote revolution ideas and starts to embrace an exchange or bookies it is doomed to fail.Feel abit guilty sitting ready to watch it without having a bet on it.I love what he is trying to do but it just isnt viable.Pun
So are you saying Czechbet that Coventry WILL eventually be on an exchange site at some point in the future based on any future "plans" you've heard about?
So are you saying Czechbet that Coventry WILL eventually be on an exchange site at some point in the future based on any future "plans" you've heard about?
Oh i get it now.They will be eligable shortly but its because they are basically a new track there is a bedding in period.So its not a case of discrimination,its the same for all new tracks opening?If thats the case its not so bad then.
Oh i get it now.They will be eligable shortly but its because they are basically a new track there is a bedding in period.So its not a case of discrimination,its the same for all new tracks opening?If thats the case its not so bad then.
betfair coverage + wednesday nights on RPGTV would be very good
tuesday and thursday 5 o'clock starts are no good for anyone, likewise tote betting, low deductions or otherwise
betfair coverage + wednesday nights on RPGTV would be very good tuesday and thursday 5 o'clock starts are no good for anyone, likewise tote betting, low deductions or otherwise
sure it would but not always possible is it, also if you want a good graded strength makes sense to televise it more people be interested in owning a dog there then imo
sure it would but not always possible is it, also if you want a good graded strength makes sense to televise it more people be interested in owning a dog there then imo