I am trying to get a definitive answer to this problem,can you help,please? The player has two dice and throws to score a 6 and an 8,(that is the combined score) ,before he throws two 7's.Obviously he loses should the two 7's appear first. Epstein gives the probability of the shooter winning as 0.56,I believe it should be 0.5455,can you solve it? The dice are six sided and fair.
20 winning combos divided by 36 possible combos gives you 0.55555555555555 using typical round up you get 0.56 he's right your wrong.
36 possible combinations on the 2 dice10 combinations to make 6 10 cambinations to make 820 winning combos divided by 36 possible combos gives you 0.55555555555555 using typical round up you get 0.56 he's right your wrong.
Gold Coast,and the 7's? From the 36 throws there are 5 that make 6 5 1 4 2 3 3 1 5 2 4 ........ and 5 that make 8 6 2 5 3 4 4 3 5 2 6 But thank you for trying to help.
Gold Coast,and the 7's?From the 36 throws there are 5 that make 65 14 23 31 52 4........and 5 that make 86 25 34 43 52 6But thank you for trying to help.
1 way to get 2 2 ways to get 3 3 ways to get 4 4 ways to get 5 5 ways to get 6 6 ways to get 7 5 ways to get 8 4 ways to get 9 3 ways to get 10 2 ways to get 11 1 way to get 12
1 way to get 22 ways to get 33 ways to get 44 ways to get 55 ways to get 66 ways to get 75 ways to get 84 ways to get 93 ways to get 102 ways to get 111 way to get 12
Mr Anderson and Reverend Bayes, It may amuse you to know that I have received an answer from another source. The method used by the other person involves,wait for it, diagonalized eigenvalues,matrices,Markov Chains and a couple of pages of figures. And blow me down they very nearly got it right!
Mr Anderson and Reverend Bayes,It may amuse you to know that I have received an answer from another source.The method used by the other person involves,wait for it,diagonalized eigenvalues,matrices,Markov Chains and a couple of pages of figures.And b
Surely the answer is an infinite series with ever decreasing values the further it goes on. Because theres always the probability that each roll of the dice doesn't make a 6,7 or 8. I think thats where all the complicated maths comes into it?
Surely the answer is an infinite series with ever decreasing values the further it goes on. Because theres always the probability that each roll of the dice doesn't make a 6,7 or 8. I think thats where all the complicated maths comes into it?
Scores in the range 1-5, 9-12 don't affect the game so, the game can be won in 6 ways: 6,8 8,6 6,7,8 8,7,6 7,6,8 7,8,6 Probability of a 7 is 6/16ths Probability of a 6 or an 8 are 5/16ths Total of the above probabilities is .54558
I think Mr Anderson explained it best though.
Scores in the range 1-5, 9-12 don't affect the game so, the game can be won in 6 ways:6,88,66,7,88,7,67,6,87,8,6Probability of a 7 is 6/16thsProbability of a 6 or an 8 are 5/16thsTotal of the above probabilities is .54558I think Mr Anderson explained
Maybe it's Alzheimers but I just don't understand this at all.
There are 5 ways of throwing a total of 6 with 2 dice, 5 1, 4 2, 3 3, 2 4, 1 5. 6 ways of total 7, 6 1, 5 2, 4 3, 3 4, 2 5, 1 6. 5 ways of total 8, 6 2, 5 3, 4 4, 3 5, 2 6.
A 6/11 chance of throwing 7 before 6, that's 54.55%.
A 6/11 chance of throwing 7 before 8, that's 54.55%.
Chance of winning with 6 and 8 before losing with two 7's looks like 45.45%.
Maybe it's Alzheimers but I just don't understand this at all.There are 5 ways of throwing a total of 6 with 2 dice, 5 1, 4 2, 3 3, 2 4, 1 5.6 ways of total 7, 6 1, 5 2, 4 3, 3 4, 2 5, 1 6.5 ways of total 8, 6 2, 5 3, 4 4, 3 5, 2 6.A 6/11 chance of t
Remember that the numbers other than 6,8 or 7 have no possible bearing on the result. There can be no draw,the shooter or the bank wins,plain and simple.
Then work it from 1-P(bank wins) or P(shooter wins) The tricky bit is that when a 6 or an 8 has shown the probabilities change. At the start we have 6/36 for 7 5/36 for 6 5/36 for 8 but since only 6,7 or 8 count we only have the 5+5+6 to worry about therefore respective probabiities are 7 6/16 6 5/16 8 5/16 but when a 6 has shown it is no longer valid hence P(8)=5/11 and P(7)=6/11 at that time. I hope that helps.
The lanterne rougeRemember that the numbers other than 6,8 or 7 have no possible bearing on the result.There can be no draw,the shooter or the bank wins,plain and simple.Then work it from 1-P(bank wins) or P(shooter wins)The tricky bit is that when a
Thanks for your reply dunlaying. I don't know the rules of the game and thought I answered the original question OK. The "no longer valid" part has me puzzled.
Regards, The Lanterne Rouge.
Thanks for your reply dunlaying. I don't know the rules of the game and thought I answered the original question OK. The "no longer valid" part has me puzzled.Regards, The Lanterne Rouge.
The lantern Rouge When a 6 or an 8 is thrown it would count as ,shall we say,a non runner. Now ,remembering that there is only one shooter,the play is,to win for shooter, 68 86 768 786 678 876 all other numbers invalid. So ,since 6 with 2 dice is 5/36 8 with 2 dice is 5/36 7 with 2 dice is 6/36 and the other numbers are "non runners"
the starting probabilities are for 6 5/16 8 5/16 7 6/16 but if we take the case where a 6 is the first valid number to show and we are working on P(shooter wins) then there are only 7's and 8's left that count. therefore our total tally of valid throws would be 5/36 for the 8 and 6/36 for the 7 hence 5/11 for an 8 and 6/11 for a 7. If I still have not made myself clear then ,please,let me know and I will try again.
The lantern RougeWhen a 6 or an 8 is thrown it would count as ,shall we say,a non runner.Now ,remembering that there is only one shooter,the play is,to win for shooter,6886768786678876all other numbers invalid.So ,since 6 with 2 dice is 5/36