|
By:
As he says it's tedious. Can't see how it would work logically. If it doesn't work logically I don't bother.
|
|
By:
will all horses
get matched the winners will all |
|
By:
I think you can get a much bigger edge on betfair by using your own judgement, than slavishly sticking to some system or other.
actually on reflection i'm not sure that a horse price is mostly generated by recent form. connections play a huge role as well. for example if a horse is trained by godolphin or hannon, or aiden o brien, then it will start at a much shorter price than if it were trained by an obscure trainer, even if the horse is of the same ability. someone with a book of stats might say that this horse trained by saeed bin suroor running at yarmouth has a 28 percent chance of winning, lets say, because that's his strike rate at yarmouth. (I don't actually know what his strike rate is i'm using it as an example.) but everyone else has access to the same information. Its only by studying the horse and the race in detail can you calculate it's true chances, which any amount of statistics will not be able to tell you. |
|
By:
Some good points Mythical prince.
Here is a controversial fairly point but I'd argue recent form is vastly overrated and effects prices of horses too much. I choose whilst using it to treat it as just another factor in my assessment of a horses chances but it is not the first thing I look at not at all. |
|
By:
Should read fairly controversial sorry.
|
|
By:
John_Cherry
You are right of course. It's total cobblers. Laying a full book only makes money if your book is more than 100%. The "lay all at SP under 10" is tosh too but I can hardly be bothered to argue the toss. |
|
By:
top2rated, Sorry but your correct, that particular statement you refer to that i made about novice
chasers was a bad example as having checked it, the system is of little use and hovers around the 100% mark return so i am sorry for mis-leading you and others, I do have profitable horse racing systems but don't think its wise of me to give them away, all i was doing with my statement is demonstrating that creating an edge is quite easy it just requires some discipline, some hard work in researching and other actions. |
|
By:
Except that you were not creating an edge and that being easy.
Having now read some of your other threads...........well!!!!!! Good luck BF Fananatic, and I hope you prosper finally making it work on here! |
|
By:
Thanks slicer, its not that easy making an edge but at least on an exchange you have the fairest chance of doing so, good luck to you too in all you do.
|
|
By:
get your christmas money on here !
|
|
By:
Gentlemen,
I told you it works and it does. Now I don't expect anyone to take my word for it, but if you're not prepared to trial it, or better download the Betfair data and prove me wrong, then how can you claim it's cobblers? At least go to the Betfair Timeform website and note down each BFSP overround / underround and add it up for at minimum a week. You'll see that I do know what I'm talking about. The average lay market is well in excess of 102% Laying a full book only makes money if your book is more than 100%. Your average book % is all that counts. John Cherry, I run lay the field at SP and those under $10.00 concurrently for commission reasons. Initially I made nothing out of laying those under 10.00 when my commission was over 4%, but it lowered my overall commission for lay the field. Now I make a small percentage laying those under 10.00 and a lot more laying the field. The logic for why it works is in black and white, quite simply check the average BFSP Market Percentage over a week. |
|
By:
okay BTO. What site do you use for Aussie racing data? cheers
|
|
By:
Hi BTOR,
Thanks for your persistence with this. I must confess that I didn't even know what BSP before this thread started but your strategy looked too tempting to not investigate further. I'm using the data available at http://promo.betfair.com/betfairsp/prices/ which covers UK and Ireland. I'm only looking at win results and using the event id to identify a unique race. From 2nd Sep 2008 the long run average overround is 100.37% in UK and 100.28% in Ireland. Above 100 yes but pretty tight after commission. The monthly averages for 2011 look like this. Month UK avg Ire avg 1 100.41% 100.54% 2 100.42% 100.58% 3 100.19% 100.95% 4 100.31% 100.52% 5 100.38% 100.24% 6 100.36% 100.03% 7 100.18% 99.53% 8 100.12% 99.99% 9 100.24% 99.57% (up to 17th/18th Sep) Is there something I'm missing (apart from Aus data)? I don't see where you get 102% from, that's a massive margin. Given that every single extra £1 on the lay side decreases the overround and eats into your profit you can understand the scepticism at making it public. Especially when there are a few, say 500 or so, users out there who would be very interested in a strategy that only breaks even after commission and they are not short of a bit of cash. |
|
By:
according to other fourmites on another forum it works. 1 lad in particular uses it as his main strategy(could be BTO!). Expect a return of 0.5%-1% max and a very bumby ride. You would need a large bank and the long term view that it works to make it worthwile.Accoring to this chap must people start it but give up calling it a breakeven strategy. BTO's margins look a little exaggarted to me. I have my doubts but it may work at very very low margins.
|
|
By:
how is the bsp calculated? If a load of people started doing what BTO said, would the edge be killed?
|
|
By:
have a look here for a detailed explanation - http://www.betfair.com/help/Help.SP.Betting/
It is hard to know exactly what the exact effect would be as they are fairly liquid markets with alot of differnt strategies going on in the market so.... |
|
By:
thanks max
|
|
By:
I don't know how to download data and use excel but i did a running count for the first week in August this year.
I didn't take out commission as I did the count in my head. It went like e.g. 101% 99% 98% 102% 103% etc which would go 1%-1%-2%+2%+3%= positive 3% Anyway the first week went as low as -41% but by the end was +115%. So one would have doubled the bank in one week! |
|
By:
Have you got the link to the other forum max?
|
|
By:
THIS IS A VERY GOOD THREAD INDEED
|
|
By:
here you go John_Cherry
http://www.propun.com.au/racing_forums/showthread.php?t=21561 The margins seem too tight for me but i suppose for a plug and play method what would you expect! Even at the lowest SP Payout per race i.e £30 over the course of 1 busy saturday you could easily be 100/200 down quid if alot of favs come in. If you have have a few days like this in a row you will find it very difficult to carry on. |
|
By:
Thanks again Max. Not sure I'm with you though. If you lay the whole field it doesn't matter which horse wins?
|
|
By:
You do the lay the field but your paying out the same amount on each runner so you will end up winning more if a long shot wins and lose if a favourite wins.Here is an example
HORSE A - 6/4 HORSE B - 6/4 HORSE C - 4/1 So for Horse A&B you will recieve £20 in stakes each for a Liability of £30. Horse C will stake £7.50 for a Liabilty of £30. If A or B win you will LOSE £2.50 and if C wins you will win £10 (Gross Profit) |
|
By:
The expected return comes from laying books over 100% all the time eeking out a profit. Laying is all about % in the Long run
|
|
By:
I've misunderstood. I thought the idea was to lay a book. You'd win and lose 1 or 2% on each race but overall you'd come out with a profit.
|
|
By:
Can one lay a book to betfair sp on here, or does it have to be a set liability?
|
|
By:
John, go back to the start of the thread and read what was written. Even I was able to make sense of it, so anyone else with moderate intelligence ought to be okay..
|
|
By:
Is there something I'm missing (apart from Aus data)? I don't see where you get 102% from, that's a massive margin.
This includes AUS data where the margin of overround is greater. 102% would be massive without commission or if you could lay the field at BFSP to payout a set amount instead of only fixed liability. Extra percentages also come from the extra exposure on horses that are underpriced or where late money is dumped in the dying seconds on a short priced favourite in the live market. |
|
By:
Can one lay a book to betfair sp on here, or does it have to be a set liability?
It has to be a book to set liability. It is simply an unbalanced book but the percentages are in you favour. If you could lay the book to payout, then everyone would hit it hard with lots of money like the 1.01 layers do. The fact that it's to liability is a godsend, because of the highs and lows you have to stake your bank properly. After a day or two where it goes against you, most people give up the ghost because they haven't researched it properly. |
|
By:
If you have have a few days like this in a row you will find it very difficult to carry on.
And that's why I use a small percentage of bank and the bank is split equally in the AUS and UK wallets. If there were no difficult days, the margin would go pretty quickly. |
|
By:
how is the bsp calculated? If a load of people started doing what BTO said, would the edge be killed?
Very few people will do it and stick with it. The way BFSP is calculated with money matched in the live markets and then money waiting to be matched at SP, I doubt whether the edge would go. If it did it would certainly self correct, as more punters would start backing at BFSP if they saw the prices were x amount better. Plus you can't stop the traders or corporates dumping large sums into the market forcing the overround. |
|
By:
how much can you realistically make with this system Overound?
|
|
By:
Thanks lads. A lot to digest (for my brain) but really appreciate your time and info.
|
|
By:
A possible skinny edge would become no edge pretty quickly if Mr B manages to convince his doubters. There is a saying "would you rather be right or rich". Edges revert to the mean too easily to publicise them you'd think.
|
|
By:
Looking at the stats, with the disclaimer that it is a backtest and so of course biased, it does seem that there is a small edge after commission.
However, as mentioned by a few people above it is a bumpy ride. So much so that I think you'd have to be willing to stomach a negative year to extract the edge in the long run. For this reason I think that the edge will remain because not many people have the capital and the patience to persist. To help smooth the bad months you could try to find other markets with an overround consistently over 100% and diversify your returns. Of course this strategy is also known as "being a bookie". |
|
By:
the edge is 1% at absolute best - more like 0.3% on average. You would need to be churning out a lot to make it pay.
|
|
By:
but you cant read
|
|
By:
I'm not really trying to convince anyone, I've given the tools to work it out for yourself. However, when someone comes along and says it's cobblers, it's clear they have no understanding and no willingness to research for themselves.
I refer back to the edges posted at various commission levels. Honestly a week is a drop in the bucket. I can tell you however that I wouldn't be wasting my time doing this if the edge were anything like 0.3% However, for the sake of argument, if the edge were a mere 1%, then one could think about it a little and think how one could improve on this edge. There are a number of ways to do this, I won't reveal them all, but I am willing to help a bit. Commission is the biggest killer, find something, anything that is breakeven at full commission and throw as much money at it as you can to reduce your commission rate for this method. You will be truly amazed at the massive difference it makes to the profit. Like anything, you need to work out how much of your bank to stake to withstand a series of losses. Personally I have never had a negative year, I've also never had a negative month, but that's because all my eggs aren't in one basket. I diversify through UK IRE and AUS racing. |
|
By:
Cheers for your insight BTO (still not sure why you would reveal a winning strategy still!)
What % of your bank would you generally use on each race - 1%,2%?. |
|
By:
Yes BTO, thanks for the theory. Some of us can see, at least, that it would work.
|