Forums

General Betting

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
kenilworth
12 Oct 10 12:27
Joined:
Date Joined: 04 Nov 05
| Topic/replies: 15,627 | Blogger: kenilworth's blog
Around 1.72 seems a bit skinny for two reasons IMO.
Their opponents haven't conceded in 3 games, and
England's priority is to win the match, not to be
up at half time although that would be helpful.
Chances are they will be in front after 45 mins
but 1.72 is no value. 12.0 Montenegro could be the
better option.
Pause Switch to Standard View England at half time
Show More
Loading...
Report kenilworth October 12, 2010 8:57 PM BST
0-0 Happy
Report Nutmeister October 12, 2010 9:30 PM BST
Bigging up a loser, cheers.

12.0 Montenegro could be the
better option.
Report Wedged October 12, 2010 9:59 PM BST
Blush
Report Trevh October 12, 2010 10:11 PM BST
Out of all the in-play International matches I've recorded over the last 7 months (including the world cup) there's only been 2 0-0's of odds 12.0 or above, and that was England both times at 18.0 and 17.0, stat of the day :)
Report DFCIRONMAN October 13, 2010 12:41 AM BST
kenilworth Joined: 04 Nov 05
Replies: 3627 12 Oct 10 23:32
Well done clarky, I backed a Montenegro clean sheet
at 12.0 (small)
======================================================

Devil Is this AFTER-TIMING K????????[:x]
Report FINE AS FROG HAIR October 13, 2010 12:54 AM BST
Well he's gotta get a few right now and then.
Be fair DFC.
Report tobermory October 13, 2010 1:27 AM BST
How is it aftertiming? he posted his bet 7 hrs before kick off [;)]
Report FINE AS FROG HAIR October 13, 2010 3:10 AM BST
He actually posted that Montenegro could be the better option.
But at least he was talking about before the off.
I hope he did put his money where his mouth was.
I think he probably did, but apparently not in any size.
A pity.
Report kenilworth October 13, 2010 9:23 AM BST
I posted England at 1.72 as to be avoid, and
suggested Montenegro as a better option at 12.0.
I would think anyone backing England at half time
at 1.72 would have had more on, than a bet on
Montenegro at 12.0. On a personal note, my stake
on a 1.72 would be 7 times that of a 12.0 chance.
Re my post on the Montenegro ''clean sheet'', that
was relative to the title of that particular thread
and would have impossible to make my point otherwise.
If that is after timing, I plead guilty.Sad
Report FINE AS FROG HAIR October 13, 2010 9:33 AM BST
Well done K.
Gonna enjoy a vacation in Montenegro some time soon, wherever the hell it is .?
Report kenilworth October 13, 2010 9:43 AM BST
FAFH, 12.0 chances carry (very) small stakes unfortunately
and the winnings wouldn't go to that unfortunately.
Montenegro ? I haven't a clue. It was a good match for me,
how about you ?
Report Angela Rebecchi October 13, 2010 10:41 AM BST
Patting himself on the back for a losing tip.
Strange actions from a strange man imho. Laugh
Report FINE AS FROG HAIR October 13, 2010 11:02 AM BST
Bad match for me I'm afraid.
Let's not go there.
Report DFCIRONMAN October 13, 2010 12:18 PM BST
Just winding you up a wee bit KDevil....wd on win.
Report kenilworth October 13, 2010 2:32 PM BST
Around 1.72 seems a bit skinny for two reasons IMO.
Their opponents haven't conceded in 3 games, and
England's priority is to win the match, not to be
up at half time although that would be helpful.
Chances are they will be in front after 45 mins
but 1.72 is no value.


That's a losing tip ?
Report DFCIRONMAN October 13, 2010 3:13 PM BST
Not exactly a crystal clear post K.......but you were spot on re ENGLAND odds being poor value at start of match.....which was a "good" post and not really worth knocking.


You did indicate " Chances are they will be in front after 45 mins " ...which did not happen......and did indicate you considered "12.0 Montenegro could be the
better option"...which did not happen.

All in all your post was fine.....GL with bets.
Report turtleshead October 13, 2010 6:11 PM BST
"Around 1.72 seems a bit skinny for two reasons IMO"

"Chances are they will be in front after 45 mins
but 1.72 is no value"

So you think the price should be less than evens, but you don't specify exactly what. You say 1.72 is "a bit skinny" and also "no value", but don't say whether there is a sufficient margin to justify a bet! I'd agree that it is pretty ambiguous also.
Report turtleshead October 13, 2010 6:12 PM BST
Surely if you were advising a lay, you would state "1.72 is poor value" ?
Report kenilworth October 13, 2010 6:15 PM BST
I thought the 12.0 for the visitors was better value
than the 1.72 for the home side, as it happened
neither of them were successful, but perhaps it was
better to have a small bet on a 12.0 loser than a
large bet on 1.72 stumer. Sad
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com