Around 1.72 seems a bit skinny for two reasons IMO. Their opponents haven't conceded in 3 games, and England's priority is to win the match, not to be up at half time although that would be helpful. Chances are they will be in front after 45 mins but 1.72 is no value. 12.0 Montenegro could be the better option.
Out of all the in-play International matches I've recorded over the last 7 months (including the world cup) there's only been 2 0-0's of odds 12.0 or above, and that was England both times at 18.0 and 17.0, stat of the day :)
Out of all the in-play International matches I've recorded over the last 7 months (including the world cup) there's only been 2 0-0's of odds 12.0 or above, and that was England both times at 18.0 and 17.0, stat of the day :)
kenilworth Joined: 04 Nov 05 Replies: 3627 12 Oct 10 23:32 Well done clarky, I backed a Montenegro clean sheet at 12.0 (small) ======================================================
Is this AFTER-TIMING K????????[:x]
kenilworth Joined: 04 Nov 05Replies: 3627 12 Oct 10 23:32 Well done clarky, I backed a Montenegro clean sheetat 12.0 (small)====================================================== Is this AFTER-TIMING K????????
He actually posted that Montenegro could be the better option. But at least he was talking about before the off. I hope he did put his money where his mouth was. I think he probably did, but apparently not in any size. A pity.
He actually posted that Montenegro could be the better option.But at least he was talking about before the off.I hope he did put his money where his mouth was.I think he probably did, but apparently not in any size.A pity.
I posted England at 1.72 as to be avoid, and suggested Montenegro as a better option at 12.0. I would think anyone backing England at half time at 1.72 would have had more on, than a bet on Montenegro at 12.0. On a personal note, my stake on a 1.72 would be 7 times that of a 12.0 chance. Re my post on the Montenegro ''clean sheet'', that was relative to the title of that particular thread and would have impossible to make my point otherwise. If that is after timing, I plead guilty.
I posted England at 1.72 as to be avoid, and suggested Montenegro as a better option at 12.0.I would think anyone backing England at half timeat 1.72 would have had more on, than a bet onMontenegro at 12.0. On a personal note, my stake on a 1.72 woul
FAFH, 12.0 chances carry (very) small stakes unfortunately and the winnings wouldn't go to that unfortunately. Montenegro ? I haven't a clue. It was a good match for me, how about you ?
FAFH, 12.0 chances carry (very) small stakes unfortunatelyand the winnings wouldn't go to that unfortunately. Montenegro ? I haven't a clue. It was a good match for me,how about you ?
Around 1.72 seems a bit skinny for two reasons IMO. Their opponents haven't conceded in 3 games, and England's priority is to win the match, not to be up at half time although that would be helpful. Chances are they will be in front after 45 mins but 1.72 is no value.
That's a losing tip ?
Around 1.72 seems a bit skinny for two reasons IMO. Their opponents haven't conceded in 3 games, and England's priority is to win the match, not to be up at half time although that would be helpful.Chances are they will be in front after 45 mins but
Not exactly a crystal clear post K.......but you were spot on re ENGLAND odds being poor value at start of match.....which was a "good" post and not really worth knocking.
You did indicate " Chances are they will be in front after 45 mins " ...which did not happen......and did indicate you considered "12.0 Montenegro could be the better option"...which did not happen.
All in all your post was fine.....GL with bets.
Not exactly a crystal clear post K.......but you were spot on re ENGLAND odds being poor value at start of match.....which was a "good" post and not really worth knocking.You did indicate " Chances are they will be in front after 45 mins " ...which d
"Around 1.72 seems a bit skinny for two reasons IMO"
"Chances are they will be in front after 45 mins but 1.72 is no value"
So you think the price should be less than evens, but you don't specify exactly what. You say 1.72 is "a bit skinny" and also "no value", but don't say whether there is a sufficient margin to justify a bet! I'd agree that it is pretty ambiguous also.
"Around 1.72 seems a bit skinny for two reasons IMO""Chances are they will be in front after 45 minsbut 1.72 is no value"So you think the price should be less than evens, but you don't specify exactly what. You say 1.72 is "a bit skinny" and also "no
I thought the 12.0 for the visitors was better value than the 1.72 for the home side, as it happened neither of them were successful, but perhaps it was better to have a small bet on a 12.0 loser than a large bet on 1.72 stumer.
I thought the 12.0 for the visitors was better valuethan the 1.72 for the home side, as it happened neither of them were successful, but perhaps it was better to have a small bet on a 12.0 loser than a large bet on 1.72 stumer.