Forums

General Betting

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
My Way De Solzen
21 Feb 10 11:50
Joined:
Date Joined: 22 Sep 01
| Topic/replies: 594 | Blogger: My Way De Solzen's blog
can anyone tell me what the expected losing run sequence for 400 bets with an average price of 3.25?

thanks
Pause • Switch to Standard View help with expected losing run...
Show More
Loading...
Report kenilworth • February 21, 2010 12:11 PM GMT
Depends on what you mean by ''a losing run''. I would imagine around 30 consecutive, but the losing run interspersed by the occasional winner can be anything.
Report Windsor to Waterlooville • February 21, 2010 12:25 PM GMT
If the losing run is anywhere near 30, it is clear they are not genuine 9/4 chances and you should be laying them.
Report starfish and coffee • February 21, 2010 12:28 PM GMT
Could get a losing run 30 on toss of a coin. Sounds a very wise expectation for 9/4 chances

There's too much attention to losing sequences anyway, the best test always should be maximum deficit
Report RacingCert • February 21, 2010 12:44 PM GMT
http://www.probabilitytheory.info/topics/winning_losing_runs.htm
Report Weary Wizard • February 21, 2010 1:12 PM GMT
I have created a little simulation program for these purposes.

With my simulation, I tested a sequence of 2,000 bets with a theoretical 9/4 probability. The distribution was an eye opener. The longest losing run was 45, so beware! ;)

It never hurts to err on the side of pessimism when it comes to these things. One (profitable) strategy of mine yields a long-term strike rate of 34% on UK horse racing, but last year I still managed a longest losing run of 34!

And as Kenilworth alludes, it's rarely one single losing run that decimates a punter's strategy. On most occasions punters slowly 'bleed to death' over time from a long-term downward cycle of losses interspersed with the occasional winner.
Report exactaman • February 21, 2010 2:07 PM GMT
When I used to go to the casino I would wait for a losing sequence and then use a staking plan to cover the maximum amount of losers.

This was reasonably successful until one day I came across a sequence that blew me out.

The maths I used to calculate the longest losing sequence were the true odds of a given result happening multiplied by 12.
E.G.when punting a10/1 shot the max. losing run would be 120(12x10). This was a pretty good guideline, although obviously not infallible.
Report freddiewilliams • February 22, 2010 8:33 AM GMT
if i lay 3 winners in a row ill cut my throat
Report ibrox • February 22, 2010 6:45 PM GMT
ive layed 5 horses on the trot and none were in the top 2 in the betting,was very painfull and took along time to get losses back,wont happen again once bitten
Report Blue eyes • February 22, 2010 6:57 PM GMT
The average longest losing streak is a shade over 14.
Report starfish and coffee • February 22, 2010 7:08 PM GMT
"Average longest'" .. Hmmmmm
Report farraflash • February 22, 2010 7:32 PM GMT
You need the strike rate for an accurate answer. If you assume 3.25 is about break even then the strike rate is about 28.57%. For 400 bets the expected longest is 15.

In a simulation of 100,000 trials for 400 bets the highest was 43.
Report Blue eyes • February 22, 2010 7:33 PM GMT
My guess from simulating it is E(x) =14.2, Var(X)=3.5
Report Blue eyes • February 22, 2010 7:36 PM GMT
Sorry, Var(X) = 3.5^2
Report Blue eyes • February 22, 2010 7:39 PM GMT
These figures mean over 400 trials you are unlikely (3%) to see a losing run of greater than 21.
Report Levelsteakprophet • February 22, 2010 8:56 PM GMT
no one biting mate
Report My Way De Solzen • February 23, 2010 1:14 PM GMT
thanks chaps. my football bets have been at an average price of 9/4 and have already hit a losing run of 13 and had their been an equaliser in one other match would have been a run of 25 losers.

i currently bet 5% of my bank on each selection and have come to the conclusion that i'm betting too much as a %. will drop to 2 or 3% i reckon. all bets are returning approx 15% POT so I don't think i should really be laying them as someone suggested!

thanks for your help
Report [x] These checkboxes suck • February 23, 2010 3:11 PM GMT
I make it 15
Report starfish and coffee • February 23, 2010 3:25 PM GMT
good for for you MWDS 2.5% is about the right level, you can see how punters underestimate losing runs and maximum deficits, good luck in the future
Report The Investor • February 23, 2010 3:32 PM GMT
Did a small simulation for average longest losing run as well, came to 13.77 but only 155 observations.

Bin Frequency
7 1
8 0
9 4
10 13
11 18
12 15
13 28
14 24
15 17
16 12
17 7
18 6
19 1
20 3
21 1
22 0
23 4
24 1
More 0
Report The Investor • February 23, 2010 3:36 PM GMT
RacingCert 21 Feb 13:44
http://www.probabilitytheory.info/topics/winning_losing_runs.htm


"In 550 throws you will get a maximum run of nine heads in a row."

What nonsense is that?
Report RacingCert • February 23, 2010 4:40 PM GMT
Search me.
Report easykc1 • March 3, 2010 9:40 PM GMT
45,3256
Report brimardon1 • March 3, 2010 10:50 PM GMT
You might be interested in how we have solved the age old problem of losing runs in horserace betting, we have devised a software program that can be used for our phone line bets or for your own bets.
This coverbet software requires a horse to run well to get your full stake money back on a loser, running well can also sometimes mean falling, going well, pulled up, running on.
We no longer get losing runs in a traditional way and it now means full confidence when betting without requiring large betting banks.
The software is fully automated and works on the api.
Report Aunty Post • March 4, 2010 5:17 AM GMT
Try this.............

http://home.iprimus.com.au/jfc2000/drawdown.htm

Not sure if it will help you but it's quick and easy!
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com