Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
LoyalHoncho
09 Jan 26 21:21
Joined:
Date Joined: 28 May 10
| Topic/replies: 21,258 | Blogger: LoyalHoncho's blog
Yeah, right David.
It’s the first time I can recall him talking such push.  Under pressure it would seem.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 54
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 09 Jan 26 21:23
Apparently he was trying to grab his collar,
and got a fist full of hair.

Hey ho.
By:
tobiasr
When: 09 Jan 26 21:43
moyes unlikely to care about a hair pull when he couldn't get zouma back in the team quick enough at wet ham after he abused a cat
By:
tobiasr
When: 09 Jan 26 21:44
laughable to say it was accidental. how do you pull hair by accident. keane had to grip it and you cant grip something accidentally
By:
tobiasr
When: 09 Jan 26 21:45
even the grabbing his collar line is hilarious. as if that's in the rules of the game
By:
tobiasr
When: 09 Jan 26 21:47
anyone with a shred of decency would have binned zouma off for that behaviour. as it was though he improved the west ham team which was all moyes was interested in. no place for morals and decency when there's pound notes to chase after
By:
Poppydog.
When: 09 Jan 26 22:14
Wrexham keeper deserved that. Chose right, and was close, to nearly every Forest pen
By:
Poppydog.
When: 09 Jan 26 22:19
Wrong thread
By:
DixieDean60
When: 09 Jan 26 22:35
tobiasr certainly has an axe to grind Laugh

It should have been up to the West Ham hierarchy to suspend or bar Zouma from playing, not the manager. They were the ones who paid his wages .   

Who knows what Keanes's intentions were ? All i would say is he has never been dismissed before for violent conduct in over 350 games so at the very least it was totally out of character. I think toffees fans were more incensed about the lack of consistency by the officials, particularly Kavanagh on VAR (he has history with EFC) who somehow decided that Hwang's awful challenge on Harrison Armstrong did not require his intervention whereas Keane's hair pull did.
By:
tobiasr
When: 09 Jan 26 22:50
Not hard to imagine you’re an Everton fan. So of course anything said against moyes isn’t for you. Fair enough. My point about Zouma wasn’t about who had sanctioning power it was about what sort of person a manager wants in their team. If behaviour like that from zouma doesn’t show him to he’s reprehensible individual I’m not sure what does and who would want someone like that in a dressing room. Answer of course is anyone who puts success on a pitch above everything else. Zouma was a good player so his behaviour was tolerated. If it had been a minor player that wasn’t in the first team that was responsible they’d have been gotten rid of without question
By:
tobiasr
When: 09 Jan 26 22:53
The line about keanes previous good behaviour doesn’t really cut it either. If anything all it suggests is Keane has got away with the dark arts before. Can only repeat what I said before which is what sort of defence is it to say he was trying to grab his collar… was Keane actually trying to choke the other player then because that’s what grabbing the collar from behind would do
By:
tobiasr
When: 09 Jan 26 22:56
The lack of consistency about var is another point and it’s impossible to disagree with the idea that consistency is lacking because the challenge by the wolves player was awful as you mentioned
By:
DixieDean60
When: 09 Jan 26 23:06
FYI I have criticised DM in the past, but he is not doing anything differently to what the vast majority of EPL managers would do, so lets get that straight.

It is not up to the manager to discipline a player for doing what Zouma did - that is the owners responsibility, he is their asset after all.

During his first spell at EFC he would at times be too defensive and i and others criticised him for that. A particular case being  the 2012 FA Cup semi against our lovely neighbours when we should have not sat on a 1 nil lead. But overall he did a cracking job.

If you really think that Keane has been getting away with such things for over a decade with nobody  noticing , then discussing it further is pretty futile i'm afraid.
By:
tobiasr
When: 09 Jan 26 23:15
It is up to him whether he wants him in his team. Moyes could have said I do not want someone like that in my team. Managers have got rid of players for much less. What I meant about Keane is it’s not hard to imagine he’s tried tricks like that before and got away with it. The fact he’s never been sent off for violent conduct before is irrelevant and also no defence for the first time it’s happened.
By:
DixieDean60
When: 09 Jan 26 23:22
In law it would be called mitigation (i.e Keanes long career without a similar occurrence).  If anything the lad has been too "nice" over the years, we have often derided him for not getting stuck in enough and giving forwards more to think about.  Now his partner in defence, Tarkowski , is a different matter Laugh
By:
tobiasr
When: 09 Jan 26 23:32
If looking at the situation from a law perspective and using law terminology then it’s an aggravating factor that moyes had no problem with zoumas behaviour and now he’s trying to defend keanes indefensible behaviour. Utterly laughable to say it’s accidental and then to suggest that even if it isn’t it’s no big deal and why were var even looking at it
By:
DixieDean60
When: 10 Jan 26 00:22
It's what managers do tobiasr, surely you've noticed by now - they all defend their players publicly but you can be sure that behind closed doors it's a different matter.
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 10 Jan 26 00:23
I don’t think Keane is a repetitively  dirty player at all but he certainly meant the hair pull.  Why I don’t know.  Had there been niggle earlier?
I agree Dixie.  Moyes sent them out at half-time in the wrong frame of mind/with negative thoughts.  They had â€pool on the ropes and should have gone for the jugular.  Jagielka let the Uruguayan pick his pocket and it was all uphill after that.  Shame.
By:
DixieDean60
When: 10 Jan 26 00:42
I imagine there had been something happen earlier Honcho, it was all very strange.  Keane is one of the most mild mannered of guys usually, maybe he's learning a few nasties from Tarkowski playing alongside him all season Laugh  The toffees are going to struggle to put a team out in the cup match this lunchtime, only about 13 first team players available for definite. I certainly won't be backing them and am surprised they are favs with the bookies.

That semi final defeat really stung and i'm sure Moyes regrets not going for it as the Reds were there for the taking.
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 10 Jan 26 01:19
It was Grealish who disgusted me, and Moyes, clearly.  What a privileged moron.  Who does he think he is disrespecting people like that?
By:
DixieDean60
When: 10 Jan 26 01:43
He was a bit silly i agree but the officials had not been the best and it was just frustration.

Its rather ironic that Jack gets constantly fouled during matches with hardly any opponents getting booked (Bradley in the derby game in Sept fouled him 4 or 5 times without sanction) but he gives a bit of dissent and gets sent off. Try explaining that to an alien Laugh
By:
PorcupineorPineapple
When: 10 Jan 26 06:26
I'd love to know the name of a manager who hasn't put success over morality. Feel like we might have been watching different sports over the last couple of decades or so.
By:
1st time poster
When: 10 Jan 26 09:55
with the rules as they are and not how people think they should be, for all those fans,managers,pundits,players  bleating about every decision on social media as though their proff reffs,if you think in this week alone
forest pen
west ham goal
keane sending off
grealish sending off
cuucaa sending off
newcastle pen
man u ruled out goal
wernt the correct decisions you deserve the standard of reffing we get in the uk, 7 of the easiest decisions reffs/var will ever have to give once you have the slo mo,s and rule book in front of you, now the rules are wrong need changing is a different argument
By:
1st time poster
When: 10 Jan 26 09:57
people start off on a loser with tneir 1st words ,which are usually
in my opinion,by my interpretation etc,your/my opinion counts for SFA we have the rules writtren down they just need applying ,not your opinion/version of them
By:
rothko
When: 10 Jan 26 12:08
I thought the red card was harsh and should have been a yellow as it didnt meet the threshold of violent conduct

Grealish was a kn0b and deserved 2 yellows
By:
DixieDean60
When: 10 Jan 26 12:18
1tp - not sure what you would do with your spare time if we were not allowed to give opinions on here Grin

You are correct that the game has rules that need to be applied, trouble is that there are too many inconsistencies in applying them. And that is because certain instances do in fact come down to opinion - for instance the Saliba "foul" on Barry that was not given in the recent Everton v Arsenal game, the on field ref and VAR official both didn't give it as "there wasn't enough contact" and yet many observers though that was wrong and indeed the KMI panel voted it should have been given.

There are many other examples like the one given, indeed Fulham got given a penalty for a very similar incident two days later, highlighting the inconsistency.
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 10 Jan 26 12:48
I don’t believe it was Grealish frustration, it was shocking indiscipline with no concern for his team-mates and their efforts.  Somebody should take him into a quiet rom and convince him of the errors of his ways.  Ego, ego, ego!
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 10 Jan 26 13:00
There is lots of inconsistency in refereeing and var decisions.

Hair pulling is a 3 match ban and red card

We should rejoice that no inconsistency occured
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 10 Jan 26 13:03
Many people feel 3 matches is harsh for hair pulling
compared to 3 games for kicking someone in the head.

Not many would disagree, but those are rules currently applied
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 10 Jan 26 15:53
Everton morale at rock bottom it would seem - three pens. missed and out of the cup to Sunderland.
Villa away next Saturday.  Nightmare for fans.
By:
DixieDean60
When: 10 Jan 26 16:21
Today was not a surprise Honcho given they were down to the bare bones. Only 13 first team players were available. Grealish, Ndiaye, Dewsbury Hall, Gueye, Branthwaite and four others all out. When these absentees start to return we will improve again i am sure of that. 

The youngsters like Armstrong and Anzou impressed and give hope for the future. Barry and Beto's penalties were very poor, Sunderland showed how to take them.

Dibling has not impressed, i said at the time of signing that i though the transfer fee was over the top, he still has time on his side but looks too lightweight to me. Rohl is struggling to fit in as well. McNeil was very good a year or two back but seems lacking in confidence, he hasn't been the same player since an injury last season, maybe down to lack of game time this season as he is no longer first choice.

Villa Park has not been a happy hunting ground for the toffees in recent years and our patched up side will do well to get anything there.
By:
rothko
When: 10 Jan 26 19:34
---you-have-to-laugh--- • January 10, 2026 1:00 PM GMT
There is lots of inconsistency in refereeing and var decisions.

Hair pulling is a 3 match ban and red card

We should rejoice that no inconsistency occure


Is there a specific rule that hair pulling is a red card and a 3 game ban?

I wasnt aware of that i thought the rule was about violent conduct

I dont agree with Moyes about much but agree it was a slight tug which imho was a yellow at most
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 10 Jan 26 19:44
It's listed as an off the ball red in laws

And interpreted as on the ball red, as it cannot
be a challenge for ball.

All straight reds are 3 games in Epl except dogso.

It is possible a 3 game ban can be lowered on appeal
if its considered harsh.

But the 3 game ban for pulling cucarella's hair stood
so I think likely this one stands.

Would be good to see it down graded to 2 or 1 game
in future seasons as its clearly not same as kicking
in heed or stamping on somebody.

Over to pgmol
By:
Crisp77
When: 10 Jan 26 19:49
Keane deserves his dreadlock holiday
By:
gotitwrong-
When: 10 Jan 26 20:13
a pete crouch special
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUijrNTDD_I
By:
thelatarps
When: 10 Jan 26 20:32
Is Moise Kean coming back to the Toffees then?
Would have thought he would be grateful to get out of bottom-of-the-table Fiorentina.
By:
DixieDean60
When: 10 Jan 26 22:35
Would certainly lead to some good word play Grin Joking apart MK couldn't do any worse than our under performing strikers, he has averaged 1 goal every 2 games for Fiorentina in the last year and a half. Same ratio for the Italian national team as well. He didn't seem to really cope with the EPL when he was here before so that would be a worry.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 11 Jan 26 18:29
Everton have confirmed in a statement that they have
seen their appeal for Michael Keane's red card
rejected by an FA panel, meaning the defender
will miss their next three fixtures
By:
tobiasr
When: 11 Jan 26 19:51
should have been doubled for suggesting it was accidental
By:
LoyalHoncho
When: 11 Jan 26 20:22
Ridiculous appeal.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com