|
By:
Try again. Forum playing up for me at the mo for some reason.
Think City will have too much for them again but as we saw last night and time and time again in this commp, anything can happen and often does. |
|
By:
i was wondering who lpool might prefer, in some ways i thought city because they know them and in recent meetings they've more than held their own, maybe even edged ahead this season?
|
|
By:
Real Madrid win-to-nil is 7/1 on 'ere. Just sayin'
|
|
By:
Im hoping Real but sadly think City
|
|
By:
Had a cheeky bet on City - Madrid ht/ft @ 25/1
|
|
By:
Madrid efficiently took their few chances...City were sloppy....and you could see the boss was seething when they did not go 3 nil up.
On good changes they should have won 6-3 or 7-3 .....I think this failure will come back to bite them tonight. Madrid have been in the 3 best games I have seen this season PSG (home) , Chelsea (home) , City (away) ...hoping for more of the same. |
|
By:
Real Madrid: Courtois, Carvajal, Militao, Nacho, Mendy, Casemiro, Kroos, Modric, Valverde, Vinicius Jr, Benzema
Man City: Ederson, Walker, Dias, Laporte, Cancelo, Rodrigo, De Bruyne, Bernardo, Mahrez, Jesus, Foden |
|
By:
No Bale in the squad
Citeh to reach final ![]() |
|
By:
Think ill go overs, a little bit on madrid in 90 and to qualify
Basically pickng the value even though it goes against who I think |
|
By:
£20 Real Madrid win.
|
|
By:
I think Madrid will be happy to keep it at 0-0 for as long as possible (If they can). And hope to score 2nd half. Anything could happen, I guess, but 1.27 for City to qualify is not great value
|
|
By:
Is it bad value then? Looks the correct price to me.
|
|
By:
People forgetting that Ederson will cost City a goal?
|
|
By:
well, it's still coming down, so, I guess you must be right,. as long as Madrid don't score first.
|
|
By:
Don't really get that statement Des. If Real Madrid score first, then 1.27 City to qualify will obviously not be a nice price !
|
|
By:
The ref leniant
![]() |
|
By:
maybe not well worded, Angela. What I meant was 1.2 - 1.27 seems poor value if one goal for the home team puts the tie in the balance again.
|
|
By:
Then again if City score it will look decent.
|
|
By:
I backed 0-0 9.0, unlikely but looked a touch of value.
|
|
By:
I'm happy with 0-0 at 22's
![]() |
|
By:
Good on ya Des. Let's hope for some top drawer defending next half !
|
|
By:
yes, but I've laid off at 8.
|
|
By:
frustrating for Overs backers, I guess. I considered it myself, it's a very different game this time, though. City a lot more circumspect this time.
|
|
By:
Overs a long shot now
![]() Can land the other two |
|
By:
Des
Not shocked, its nervy this time round and so its expected theres not many goals because of it Real dont need to chase it yet |
|
By:
Never mind Sonty. Your lot almost got me a nice win yesterday, before conceding late.
![]() |
|
By:
benz just looked a bit off
|
|
By:
Ah we didnt come out 2nd half
![]() |
|
By:
thought Surridge would score, maybe could've done
|
|
By:
That was the chance off the bar, great counter just couldnt finish it off
|
|
By:
omg howler
|
|
By:
pen turned dowm as well.
|
|
By:
Yeah shocking decision
|
|
By:
Thought theyd scored there with the way the fans were sounding
|
|
By:
Gotta score when on top and real should be ahead early on here
|
|
By:
cittayy getting the sh***
|
|
By:
Almost the perennial Ederson fúck up there
|
|
By:
Madrid started this half much better. Lack of quality preventing them from having a few solid shots on goal so far.
|
|
By:
Walker has done a good job, but looks like he's just about done.
|
|
By:
City have a long way to go to hang on
![]() |