Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 151 comments are related to the topic:
ARTETA OUT

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 151
By:
lurka
When: 18 Aug 21 18:20

Aug 17, 2021 -- 9:15PM, LoyalHoncho wrote:


So, according to Lurka, Wenger, who loved Arsenal so much, and probably still does, and managed them for more than twenty very successful years, then operated a "scorched earth" policy in ADVANCE of leaving.

By:
lurka
When: 18 Aug 21 18:24
You haven't a clue. Do you think you know more about Arsenal than I do?

Instead of attacking me, why don't you go through what I wrote and point out where I am wrong. You won't do this because you don't have the minerals to engage in a cogent argument and aren't as familiar with the facts or history as I am. You consistently write vague, two-line nonsense ripostes with emoji's on this forum. That's the level of discussion you are at. Primary school level.
By:
lurka
When: 18 Aug 21 18:31
Wenger lost his advantage in the French market. By 2015 it was Leicester picking up relative unknowns like Mahrez and Kante and winning the league. That's what Wenger used to do.

When you are at the top you are the benchmark, people copy you and you lose your advantage. The drinking culture stopped after Wenger arrived because he was all about preparation and diet etc and revolutionised English football on and off the pitch. The rest followed suit. You see the same thing happening with Pep, the league is full of copycat managers.

Wenger was a busted flush for at least 5 years before he left. He was a control freak and had way too much control from top to bottom at Arsenal. No manager should be involved in some of the stuff he had input into, like the stadium etc. He even interviewed his own boss, Gazidis, for his job! And even Kroenke, the most famous absentee owner of all, had to step in before the end and wrestle control of transfer policy from Wenger, who had complete carte blanche before then and often refused to spend. Kroenke! The last owner in the league to get involved in anything. That's how bad Wenger had got and how badly the state of the squad had become a couple of years before he left.
By:
lurka
When: 18 Aug 21 18:35
I wasn't suggesting Wenger did any of that deliberately. It was gross incompetence and obsession with personal success (ie getting back to top 4) coupled with the knowledge that he wouldn't have to deal with the aftermath. Same with Fergie. The Last Dance.
By:
ImSoLuckyLucky!
When: 18 Aug 21 18:39
LaughLaughLaugh
By:
sofaking
When: 18 Aug 21 21:25
50 million for Ben White, 30 million for Odengaard, massive new deals for aging players who are well past their best. Has someone infiltrated Arsenal and are they sabotaging them in the transfer market?
By:
BULLET TOOTH TONY
When: 18 Aug 21 21:29
Ben white the towering presence that Arsenal have been waiting for
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 18 Aug 21 21:33
I thought the towering presence went to Marseille?
By:
BULLET TOOTH TONY
When: 18 Aug 21 21:35
certainly hasnt got an arsenal shirt. to many boys in the arsenal setup, has been for 10 plus years
By:
BULLET TOOTH TONY
When: 18 Aug 21 22:14
Odegaard, White and Ramsdale....... Arsenal really wetting the apetitie of Arsenal supporters
By:
G Hall
When: 18 Aug 21 22:28
Ramsdale goodness me, nothing against the lad, but last season Bournemouth to Sheffield united that's about right, but to arsenal it doesn't fit right, the lad is too small to be a top top keeper, something very wrong at arsenal.
By:
tobermory
When: 19 Aug 21 00:38
Great posts Lurka.

I see Emery/Arteta as a continuation of the late Wenger Era.

It really would be much the same if Arsene was still there.
By:
n88uk
When: 19 Aug 21 10:43
I don't get the Ramsdale at all. He is an average to bad goalkeeper in my eyes, will he even start? Otherwise you've just paid 24+6m for a reserve goalkeeper? What? Feels like Arsenal are spending a lot of money to not really improve.
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 19 Aug 21 12:19
You think if your club spent over one tenth of one million pounds on new players that the fans might get at least a semi but no. Most are putting their heads in their hands and some like the Arsenal goalkeepers are missing!.
By:
Blackrock
When: 19 Aug 21 12:25
Leno is obviously Arteta's No 1. Why else would you allow Martinez to leave and not take up the option to buy Mat Ryan? Both are very good keepers in my mind.

So to spend 30 mill on a reserve keeper is feckin ludicrous.
By:
ImSoLuckyLucky!
When: 19 Aug 21 12:29
Probably bought on the HP

LaughLaughLaugh
By:
Blackrock
When: 19 Aug 21 12:30
That's why Pepe and White were bought so you may have a point.
By:
Guernsey Sunbed
When: 19 Aug 21 19:19
Lurka.

Really factual posts and i agree 100% with virtually everything you say.

I totally despair of what has happened over the past few seasons.

The trouble is i don't see it getting any better any time soon.

It's going to be a hard long season, again!!
By:
themightymac
When: 19 Aug 21 22:53
Should never have got rid on Wenger.
By:
TOP3MAN
When: 19 Aug 21 23:28
Has Arsenal really spent as much money on players as Chelsea, city nad United over the last 5 years? all that to finish 7th
By:
tobermory
When: 22 Aug 21 17:12
Cry
By:
tobermory
When: 22 Aug 21 18:23
Man City (A) next
By:
The Dragon
When: 22 Aug 21 18:36
no hope relegation certsCrySadWink

put your mortgage on them to go downSilly
By:
cricketnut2
When: 22 Aug 21 18:37
they'll be bottom by then, as Man City will anialate Arsenal.
By:
duffy
When: 22 Aug 21 18:46
Arteta isn't in a good place for sure but I don't think today's "performance" made it worse.
By:
lurka
When: 22 Aug 21 19:37
They've already spunked all they are willing to spend this window on Arteta.

In previous years I think they were constrained by the massive wage bill and FFP rules and couldn't spend any more on a manager, which is why they went cheap with Emery and Arteta rather than spend the £10m+ Wenger was on (they had to pay off both Wenger and Emery when they left which ate into the wage budget for the next manager).

But this year those rules have been relaxed which is why they've gone and outspent everyone after a year of low revenues. So they could have gone out and thrown a big wage at a top manager for the first and prob only time this year. They'd have been better off. They could probably still do this even now and once the rules are reintroduced they will be back in the same boat. A missed opportunity.

I don't think they are complete skinflints, they increased spending after they took control in 2011 and again after they lost CL and have made a loss every year since. They spend within the club's means and within the FFP rules. It makes no sense to spend £200m and waste it like Arteta has. They are just clueless mugs who have prob missed a massive opportunity to get someone like Conte in this window.
By:
Storm Alert
When: 23 Aug 21 10:05
Good post lurka. I never though the day would come Arsenal would spend +100m on transfers and I would be so underwhelmed. The first few games sort of set the tone for the season, Arsenal are bound to lose at City and it is going to be a long season for fans to endure. Will probably finish mid table again, they seem to play best in low pressure under the radar matches. Sadly Arteta does not make the grade, he seemed to get the team together but not much else going well atm.
By:
G Hall
When: 23 Aug 21 14:21
A tricky one, arteta obviously clueless, that won't change. The new signings will probably all at the very least hold their value you would imagine, of course a lot depends on how they settle  and aubamayang will probably go, so from a financial point of view they are not the worst decisions.
However until a top class manager comes in they are at nothing, and like the chicken and egg, unless you have a top manager and champion league football you won't get top players.

Then what do you do, you get a potentially top class manager, and sign the best players from lower league clubs and bridge the gap to champions league places hopefully achieving it withing 3/4 seasons, BUT NOT with ARTETA in charge.
By:
G Hall
When: 23 Aug 21 14:22
Sorry meant lower clubs in terms of size, not lower league clubs.
By:
lurka
When: 23 Aug 21 20:19
You think Ben White and Ramsdale will hold those values?
By:
G Hall
When: 23 Aug 21 21:09
I think there is a good chance they will, just my opinion.
By:
lurka
When: 24 Aug 21 19:53
Can't see those two holding those values. There is a premium on them because they are English/homegrown. Can only see another English club paying that much for them and realistically that would only be one of the CL clubs. They will not look worth anything like that money playing under this manager. And the club are useless at getting value in the transfer market.
By:
tobermory
When: 24 Aug 21 20:10
In any case once 'resale value' is the crucial factor in your signings you are finished as a big club.

The aim of top clubs is to sign world class players, keep them for their prime years, then let them go to MLS or back to South America when they are 33, with no concern about getting a fee.
By:
lurka
When: 25 Aug 21 08:20
Arsenal are not a top club any more. There should be some element of signing players who might appreciate in value and to generate extra revenue from transfer market profits if they want to get back to the top quickly. Liverpool have done this to great effect in recent years to come from outside top 4 to winning the league and PL and money/profits they generated from player sales played a major part in that.

But when you are spending £200m in 18 months you should expect a large chunk of that to improve the team immediately and it doesn't seem to have, nor do the bulk of the players bought look like they will appreciate in value. Having a manager who gets the best out of the players also increases the value of almost the whole squad. That is the most important signing you can make. Klopp and Arteta are opposite ends of the spectrum in that regard.

Chelsea made over £450m profit on player sales in the 10 years to 2019 and City also generate money from player sales. It is not as simple as looking at what a player cost v what he was sold for. A player's cost is written down/amortised over the length of his contract and even if you sell him at a 'loss' with a year left on his contract that can actually show as a profit in the books and allows you to spend more in that accounting period under FFP rules. Marina at Chelsea and her counterpart at Liverpool are prob the best in the league at doing this.
By:
lurka
When: 25 Aug 21 08:32
eg you buy a player for 80m on a 5 year deal. If you sell him for 30m after 4 years, you will have written the cost down in your accounts by 16m x4 = 64m with 16m cost left in the final year and that will show as a 14m profit (30m - 16m) on your books. Most fans will see that as a 50m loss.
By:
SirNorbertClarke
When: 25 Aug 21 08:45
When a coach comes to a club that's in need of rebuilding it takes a while for the club to get the players in that the coach deems necessary to improve the squad.

Any coach can tell his chairman he wants Kane, Mbappé & Van **** but the chairman might not be willing to splash out that kind of cash and Kane, Mbappé & Van **** might not want to join a team in transition. So the coach has to accept lesser players who will improve the team.

Arteta left the comfort and endless cash of City to take on the huge task of revitalising Arsenal and the club have a very difficult start to the season. It's easy for fans to throw around charges of being useless but sometimes it's not all the coach's fault.
By:
lurka
When: 25 Aug 21 08:59
You'd have a point if he'd just joined this season. He's been there 18 months and hasn't improved them one bit. The goals conceded column has improved a lot. People say the defence has improved but it hasn't. He defends with 8 or more men behind the ball like Southgate. The attack, which was never a problem at Arsenal for the last 25 years, has massively suffered as a result.

Auba was scoring as many as Salah, Kane, Aguero, Mane with a better chance conversion rate before this manager joined, even when Emery had lost the drressing room but the first thing this mug does is play a false 9 and stick him on the left wing.

The team has zero ideas going forward. His only attacking tactic in 18 months is 'give the ball to Tierney and play a ball over the top to Auba' - this got him a win in the FA cup but the next season teams had copped onto it and since then it's 'give the ball to Tierney and cross it into the box' even though we've no strikers who can head the ball.

It is baffling to me how many people cannot use their eyes and instead prefer to swallow the media narrative that this guy is a 'talented' manager. He has never once shown an ounce of talent. Nobody had a clue what his man-management skills were or his nous in the transfer market would be but he seems to be seriously lacking in both departments as well. Literally zero to justify 18 months or turgid football that Emery was fired after 3 months of.
By:
SirNorbertClarke
When: 25 Aug 21 09:12
lurka you obviously watch more Arsenal games than me and you are clearly upset at the tactics Arteta uses to strengthen the defence. All I am saying is he has had just a couple of summer transfer windows and bringing in real talent to a club in Arsenal's position is not an easy task.
By:
Blackrock
When: 25 Aug 21 11:31
I'd like to know how much input MA has in transfers. Or is it all done to Edu?

Arteta's coaching methods are strange to say the least. He likes to keep possession of the ball, most of the time going nowhere. The out ball is then to Tierney who tends to drive in a low ball usually cut out by the opposition defence.

We don't throw in many high balls coz we have no forwards who are good in the air. Tammy would have given Arsenal an added option in that sense. So the ball is played back across to the other side of the pitch, sideways and sideways until the ball is lost.
The defenders we have couldn't hold their own against many forwards in this league, so rely on added help from midfield.

The first goal against Chelsea was farcical. No cover for Tierney when he went forward being the main problem. If an under 8 team defended like that you'd be bollocking them bigtime. The pressing game Arteta began with has almost stopped.

I think the players have lost faith in the 'process' and when he is sacked im sure there wont be a queue for his services elsewhere.
By:
lurka
When: 25 Aug 21 12:03
Tierney regularly puts in aerial balls, as does Pepe or whoever is on the right. Arteta looks like he's learned more from working under Moyes than Pep and Wenger combined, not that he's a patch on Moyes.

Not sure how much input he has but he has enough. Edu is another mug who should be long gone and has had dodgy dealings with Koorabchian and some questionable agent's fees. But Mari and Willian were both Arteta signings. Mari is Spanish and Arteta knew him from his Man City days where he was a complete flop and didn't play 1 game.

That's another weird thing about Arteta. I know he's inexperienced but you don't see him go in for any young players from City who he must know, even on loan. Nearly every manager brings in players they have worked with before, even inexperienced ones. Maybe they know he only pumped up the balls at City?

The pressing game stopped after about 5 games in charge. It worked to great effect against United at home in his 3rd game and then he abandoned it for some inexplicable reason.

It's relly amazing some of the guff the media have spouted about this guy. There was talk of him being courted by Barca when Koeman got the job and he even had to come out and deny it when questioned about it.
Page 2 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com