Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 102 comments are related to the topic:
Liverpool admit they are a lying bunch of scoundrels.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 102
By:
Biscuit1979
When: 03 Mar 14 13:15
TBB - what will you say next season if a United side who aren't in Europe launch an assault on the title? Will you accuse them of 'cherry picking'?
By:
spyker
When: 03 Mar 14 13:15
I did tell you not to bother old girl - complete and utter drivel and nonsense! Do keep it up - the next 2 months will be very entertaining........
By:
Captain Wurzel
When: 03 Mar 14 13:26
Oh, we wont bother with  the FA cup
we wont bother with the League Cup
we wont bother qualifying for europe (last season)




Knocked out of FA cup away at Arsenal fielding a strong side

Just failed to qualify for Europa after a strong finish last season.


You may be onto something with the league cup tho - knocked out by manure no way that would have happened if pool had
been trying.
By:
barry proudfoot
When: 03 Mar 14 14:43
didn't lawyers and the pfa look at the contract and said the clause said Liverpool didn't have to sell at £40 million + offers.
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 03 Mar 14 15:41
I think the Liverpool fans are being disingenuous here. The point being made isn't about Liverpool refusing to sell Suarez. I'd fully expect them to work hard to keep hold of their better players. The point is that the club and indeed Rodgers lied about the clause. From this point onwards their word means nothing. They are proven liars and will be judged as such.
By:
spyker
When: 03 Mar 14 16:18
By you? I'm sure they will release a press statement imminently - good god man get a grip - they aren't even near to winning it yet ffs, what will you be like if they actually do get near to winning it!
By:
maleuk01.
When: 03 Mar 14 18:39
eternaloptimist and etterbetter

I think you haven't got the correct facts to hand with regards the contract.

Also be careful as to who you accuse of lying or leave yourself open to legal ramifications.

Im very surprised betfair haven't banned you both.
By:
hitmanhearn
When: 03 Mar 14 19:08
The  Bitter Better in seething at Liverpool success shocker.Trembling with rage.
By:
breadnbutter
When: 03 Mar 14 19:14
legal ramifications ...Laugh
By:
loui
When: 03 Mar 14 20:51
seethe-fest. love it!!
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 03 Mar 14 23:43
maleuk

I refer you to what John Henry said on the matter:

"He had a buyout clause of £40m. Arsenal, one of our prime rivals – this year we’re tied for 2nd … we’re actually 2nd because of GD"

A. "They offered £40m+£1. What we’ve found ... is that contracts don’t seem to mean a lot in England – actually, in world football."


At the time Liverpool and Rodgers denied any such clause. So you tell me how you would describe the inconsistency between then and now?
By:
crystalhunt
When: 04 Mar 14 00:34
Moral indignation - get over it. Why would you care about such matters. Football is a game of bluff and counter bluff and nobody in the game is exempt.Far more important things to worry about.
By:
efisio.
When: 04 Mar 14 02:07
A buy-out clause in a contract typically allows a player to leave a club if a stated minimum transfer value is met - but Liverpool insisted last summer that there was nothing in Suarez's contract obliging them to sell the player.
What we have here is a poster who comes with with a sensationalist thread title to pander to other plastic sh!ts and hopefully make a few chums. Whereas real fans from all clubs would do nothing but applaud what the American owners did in the summer, and stop players and agents trying to dictate and hold clubs to ransom.
One of the most negative things the internet has done, is to give the same type of plastic gobsh!tes who are ruining the sport, a voice on forums that has no positive impact whatsoever, on what was once a fantastic sport for common hard working people. Go an f off back to chit chat, and keep quoting your tabloid bile there.
By:
themover
When: 04 Mar 14 02:59
At least Suarez now knows a Liverpool contract means sweet f all....he'll be off at the first opportunity, Champions League at Liverpool or not. Anyone else for a Liverpool contract that means nothing? Laugh
By:
spyker
When: 04 Mar 14 09:48
Of course they could have done things 'The UTD Way" and been held to ransom (3 times) by an over-rated player that they are desperate to hold on to (even though very few clubs want him) so pay him stupid amounts of money to stay - that's that's the way to do it! There are some very naive and somewhat stupid people on this thread - roll on the next few months to 'out' them some more - please do carry on with the faux indignation as it really is very funny.
By:
efisio.
When: 04 Mar 14 10:19
Yes you must indeed be correct themover, after all he looks really unhappy now knocking all those goals in.
By:
wallis
When: 04 Mar 14 10:22
"At least Suarez now knows a Liverpool contract means sweet f all....he'll be off at the first opportunity, Champions League at Liverpool or not. Anyone else for a Liverpool contract that means nothing? "

Since when did any players contract mean anything ? Rooney signed an extension , then couldnt wait to get out of United , so they chucked more money at him and United tried to have everyone believe that Rooney never wanted to leave Laugh

Suarez has signed up for the next few years , do you really believe that he would see out that contract if Liverpool dont make the CL ?   You must be living in a dream world if you think a contract means something these days.
By:
lfc1971
When: 04 Mar 14 11:07
Very poor this from Liverpool, it is simply not possible to build a team without trust between
management and players. Before  we get ahead of ourselves Liverpool have not won anything yet.

This Liverpool team, although exciting to watch, are a long way from the truly great teams of the past.
Those teams were built on a certain code of standards...ignore these things at your peril.
By:
REDUNDANT PUNTER
When: 04 Mar 14 11:08
In essence the contract merely acts as a safety blanket if a player runs it down he can move for nothing or a fraction of his worth to the club

Having a player under contract helps keep his price in the market at a level you are happy with gives you an advantage when negotiating imo
By:
miss.wales
When: 04 Mar 14 11:31
To all intents and purposes contracts have been solely for the protection of the player for many years now. They safeguard the player against career-ending injuries or complete loss of form. If they ever want to break the contract they just go right ahead.

John Henry is absolutely spot on in his reading of the situation and Liverpool should be applauded for taking a stand against this odious Uruguayan.
By:
TheBetterBettor
When: 04 Mar 14 11:37
says the woman who's team is always on the recieving end of suarez's goals
By:
mysexyscousebirdkylietait
When: 04 Mar 14 11:39
The loyalty Suarez was shown by Liverpool during his darkest times the man shouldn,t need a bloody contract.

Individuals and the club put reputations on theline for him,  he,s the best inthe prem atm.
By:
martin_593114
When: 04 Mar 14 12:34
It's about time clubs stood up against the players they have far too much power now. I would like to hope we would do the same if a player we wanted kept wanted out. We always tend to sell although we do seem to get a good price.
By:
themover
When: 04 Mar 14 12:57
if Madrid come calling he will bite their hand off
By:
Biscuit1979
When: 04 Mar 14 13:29
If it was Barca or Real in for him and Suarez had wanted to leave, how much consideration do you think he'd have given to his Liverpool contract? Not much i reckon, he'd have psuhed for a move and been on his way. Fair play to Liverpool and an opportunity missed by the Spanish giants to get a player for 40m who is now going to cost double that.
By:
themover
When: 04 Mar 14 14:04
I don't think Real could finance a Suarez and Bale purchase in the same summer window, but I wouldn't expect the £70 million (if that is now the release clause) to put them off this summer if they decide he is to be this years main target.
By:
Biscuit1979
When: 04 Mar 14 14:27
Yeah it definitely won't put them off, especially if they can get someone like Arsenal or Spurs to pay over the odds for Benzema
By:
Alias
When: 04 Mar 14 15:20
It'll be interesting to see how he reacts the next time the wheels fall off the rancid Anfield cart.


Out of interest, is it possible for a cart to be rancid?
By:
REDUNDANT PUNTER
When: 04 Mar 14 15:27
Maybe he meant racist
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 04 Mar 14 15:59
lfc puts it perfectly:

Very poor this from Liverpool, it is simply not possible to build a team without trust between management and players. Before we get ahead of ourselves Liverpool have not won anything yet.

This Liverpool team, although exciting to watch, are a long way from the truly great teams of the past. Those teams were built on a certain code of standards...ignore these things at your peril.


Liverpool were a team players battered down the doors to get into because as well as being the best they conducted themselves as you would want winners to.
By:
TheBetterBettor
When: 04 Mar 14 16:06
If Liverpool wanted a public apology from suarez for disrespecting the players at training.

Why wouldn't they do the same for disrespecting his contract terms and demands?


Seems as always at Liverpool its double standards.
By:
spyker
When: 04 Mar 14 16:41
Keep it going you 2 as you are def gaining respect and kudos and not looking increasingly sad and bitter in the slightest - don't let anyone tell you different!
Only 2 months or so to go lads...........
By:
stridingedge
When: 04 Mar 14 17:32
RP Laugh
By:
Biscuit1979
When: 04 Mar 14 17:41
Thread update.

TBB still seething.

Carry on.
By:
breadnbutter
When: 04 Mar 14 17:43
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-26433208
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 04 Mar 14 20:12
So tell me spyker. If Rodgers broke into your house while you were asleep and curled a fat one into your mouth after scuttling your misses would you be critical then or the same apologist as now?
By:
crystalhunt
When: 04 Mar 14 21:49
Eeternaloptimist • March 4, 2014 8:12 PM GMT
So tell me spyker. If Rodgers broke into your house while you were asleep and curled a fat one into your mouth after scuttling your misses would you be critical then or the same apologist as now?

Eh!
Getting a bit ridiculous now IMO. Give up mate,nobody is interested - all part of football, warts an all.
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 04 Mar 14 21:55
There's plenty of warts but because they are Liverpool warts some of you dopes are quite happy. This country was once famed the world over for honesty, fair play and the game being about how it was played. How far we have fallen.
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 04 Mar 14 21:56
It's endemic from top to bottom in public life. Lie and deceive for long enough and maybe the story will be forgotten in the mists of time.
By:
crystalhunt
When: 04 Mar 14 22:36
Eeternaloptimist - I wouldn't condone Liverpool FC'S deceit in this matter but it hardly matters to the likes of me who are just about managing to pay the household bills. Football lost all credibility a long time ago when it started to pay ridiculous wages to grossly overrated players and even more grossly overrated managers. The story is virtually forgotten now never mind in the mists of time.
I would turn my back on the game completely if it weren't for my tribal instincts which compel me to support my team, but only from my armchair.
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com