Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 117 comments are related to the topic:
Newcastle EVENS (at Home!) to beat WEST HAM!!
Newcastle EVENS (at Home!) to beat WEST HAM!!
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 117
|
By:
party look at it this way...
I meant want I said party. No Colocini (relating to his absence today) is a disaster for Newcastle Perhaps then you will realise that it is you who has misinterpreted! He backs the statement up by suggesting that Williamson is not an adequate replacement. |
|
By:
That being the case then, you must know fcuk all about Newcastle United as well seeing as we actually agree about Coloccini?
I dont think anyone with half a brain could not understand what I said to be honest but I'll try my best to make it EVEN easier for you: No Colloccini is a disater for Newcastle. That means him not playing is a disaster. Understand so far? Good. That means I think hes class and its a disaster hes not playing. I want him playing cos hes class. Now, surely you understand that. I dont mind having an argument on here cos its all about opinions but its a bit frustrating having someone argue with me when they actually agree with me, theyre just too thick to know it!! |
|
By:
Party's just explained that he made a mistake!
|
|
By:
NO problem. Posted my reply before I saw yours!
 |
|
By:
Yes i was wrong! Im a bad person! A bit argument on a forum dosnt hurt anyone though! Iv put my hands up and will take a bit more time to try and read and understand comments in future! Is that Grovelling enough? ;)
|
|
By:
Rowan86 simply posted within a minute of each other, all is fine with the world now.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Keep it up CJ. You are a fantastic source of value.
Last week; "Liverpool are far too short at 1.6, but I'm going to back them because the price might shorten so I can green up." Cheers for that. I enjoyed the 1.6. By the way, a better approach would have been to wait to see if the price shortened and just lay Liverpool if it did. If 1.6 was too short , then it's actually mathematically impossible for there to be more value in the attempted trade than the lay at a shorter price, because obviously the lay at a shorter price would be the same as the trade, but without the poor value back at 1.6. This week; "Newcastle are an excellent price, but I'm going to pass because I won't be able to change positions in-running." Cheers for that too. It's partly thanks to people like you that I've been able to get on Newcastle at 2.06. |
|
By:
Ah yes, sorry. Noticed you posted at pretty much the same time!
|
|
By:
I see you've also taken to making up quotes again, it makes you look silly.
I've given up trying to explain to you how an exchange works. You'd rather struggle to eat soup with a fork than learn how to use a spoon. Good luck to you. |
|
By:
[X] shrewdies
|
|
By:
should be a good match,id fancy both sides to scoire
|
|
By:
Making up quotes? You think I'm going to dig-up the quotes? Those quotes are pretty much an exact representation of what you said. It's interesting that you're uncomfortable with them.
How exchanges work? You need to stop waffling about how exchanges work and consider what you're doing on a fundamental level. Like last week, you backed Liverpool at what you thought was a bad price hoping the price would shorten so you could green-out. It's a mathematical fact that long-term, someone that repeatedly waits to see if the price will shorten and then lay is likely to do better than someone that repeatedly makes a poor value bet and then hopes to lay at a shorter price. I'm more than happy to provide the mathematical proof of that, but hey, you're too pig-headed for that. |
|
By:
As I say good luck to you if you just want to back who you think will win. I told you last week and I'll tell you again this week that you are better off taking bookie priority prices.
|
|
By:
Some forum this. Just constant bickering and very little in the way of opinions of the match!
|
|
By:
I am if I can find better prices. I haven't seen these priority prices. I'll believe it when I see them.
You are mathematically wrong in your approach. I can prove that whilst you waffle on about "how exchanges work". |
|
By:
Sorry Ouspenski. Don't want to hi-jack the thread.
|
|
By:
1/1 was a good price, but I didn't have the home
side any shorter than 1.90, which meant no bet for me. |
|
By:
With Tiote and Colocinni out I had them as a back anything above 2.05, lucky the market didn't push them out.
|
|
By:
It's starting to looks as if Sam Allardyce is going to get one over today.
|
|
By:
Are Newcastle going to nick a goal here?
|
|
By:
5 mins injury time
 Enough time for a Ba goal |
|
By:
marychain1
Date Joined: 05 Apr 05 11 Nov 12 08:46 Joined: 05 Apr 05 I am happy to lay Newcastle at evens here, take as much as you like. Easy |
|
By:
Newcastle are garbabe. Embarrassing result for them.
|
|
By:
Krull ducked under the header?
Fans will be starting to think Pardew might be looking for his multi million pound payout already? |
|
By:
8 year contract. he's unsackable.
|
|
By:
Bitterly disappointed about this. :(
|
|
By:
Sackable at the right price. That's what the long contracts are all about.
|
|
By:
wel,well well
 |
|
By:
Just can't believe it. Gutted.
|
|
By:
who would have thought West Ham would be 6th
wonder how Blackburn fans feel?  |
|
By:
I'm seething about that. Raarrrrrrr
|
|
By:
Most fans know effall about football. Allardyce is an excellent manager. Would do well in the England job, I reckon.
|
|
By:
Probably is a class manager. Seemed to get everything right tactically there. Frustrating as hell. Absolutely gutted.
|
|
By:
He's too ugly.
|
|
By:
He reckons he could be Barcelona or Real Madrid manager if his name was Sam Allardicci instead of Sam Allardyce.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Barcelona or Real Madrid combined with the Allardyce flair and adventure could be a good combination.
|
|
By:
I think his style is called balón largo there.
|