NEIL LENNON WHATS HES PROBLEM

Lennon is dragging Celtics reputation lower and lower.

The man is unstable and shows no class.

he doesnt come over as a nice man though does he!!

How is this man allowed to have a position of responsibility, he is an awful human being

had to laugh when i read that he said he things celtic can win the champions league

He was arguing with people on twitter yesterday even Celtic fans What manager of a supposed 'big' team should be doing that?

He hasn't go a clue what he's doing. He's got a squad of mostly quality players but he has no idea whose good, whose bad, where to play them or who to play. He gave a player a 3 year contract on 1 performance

Because he's 'Celtic minded' the fans won't admit he's out his depth.

Onedayilwin
16 Apr 12 09:44
Because he's 'Celtic minded' the fans won't admit he's out his depth.

i think a similar thing is happening at liverpool.

Suppose the Klu-Klux-Klan were the dominant force within the WBA and were responsible for selecting and disciplining referees and judges.

Would there still be black world champions?
Yes, there would be less of them but sometimes the gulf in class would be too great to be overcome by refereeing bias.

Would there be black referees?
Yes, without the token black(s) no one would take the claims of the WBA being an unbiased organisation seriously. They would however be answerable to the KKK for their jobs.

Would an incorrect decision ever go in favour of a black boxer over a white one?
Yes, such decisions (whether by accident or by design) would most likely come in non crucial or trivial matches (accidental ones might result in demotion). These decisions would be needed to give credence to the lie that the WBA was unbiased and would continually be referred to in their defence.


In the above circumstances it's hard to imagine anyone who suggested the KKK run WBA were biased would be described as anything other than sane and they certainly wouldn't automatically be branded a paranoid black racist. So why is it anyone who thinks the SFA are biased is automatically branded a paranoid fen1an bigot? We all know the SFA / referees committee / officials are made up mainly of masons, orangemen or just plain old Rangers supporters. Even if they were selected at random from the Scottish population that would still be true (if diluted) as illustrated by the "12 just men" at the Neil Lennon assualt case. Is there anyone out there who truly believes Willie Collum would now be one of our "top referees" if his eyes in the back of his head penalty award had happened at the other end? He would've found himself refereeing meaningless games, possibly in the lower divisions, quicker than you could say "why was Andy Davis's Tynecatle hallucination rewarded with a cup final spot?".

What is it about Scottish football pundits and supporters that blinds them to this? Is it something God puts in the water? Are they forelock tuggers who think "professional" people (like Donald Find1ay) could never show bias? Do they believe there would be no bias if the bulk of the SFA was made up of Celtic men? Or maybe the bias suits them just fine? The latter explanation is the most plausable IMO. Even the non old firm clubs know that what they're robbed of in games against Rangers will, over time, come back to them in games against Celtic and they can always dress up the justifiable decisions that go Celtic's way as the "old-firm bias". And they've always got the support of the "level headed" Celtic men in the media who love their job so much they'll call it the way their bosses see it.

Could the playing field ever be level in Scottish football? Is there a solution short of going to the expense of bringing in foreign officials for every match involving either Celtic and/or Rangers? My solution would be this

50% of the SFA are appointed by Rangers, 50% by Celtic. That applies also to officials and their disciplinary panel. All Celtic games are officiated by Mason Boyne and his cohorts (virtually no change there). All Rangers games are officiated by Sean Lourdes and his cohorts. In old-firm games Sean & Mason take turn about. Sean and Mason have two choices. They can either attempt to officiate fairly or play a game of tit for tat for ever but the latter would see the offenders exiled to lower divisions by the 50-50 disciplinary panel. Non old-firm teams playing the old firm would have the satisfaction of knowing the officials are hardly likely to favour their opponents. Only one team would be a loser in this setup yet the "neutrals" won't hear of it either.

c) you are a clown

What you people fail to understand is, other people are just as bigoted and full of hate as you lot are and even if the SFA were drawn at random from the Scottish populace the bias would still exist. The fact that the SFA is an orange lodge in everything but name only serves to make the situation even more obvious.

No one has yet attempted a sensible answer to the question "why would bias not exist?".

Feck - maybe people would answer your questions if you came at it from a more sensible standpoint.

You think that there's bias.

But you need to understand that it's an opinion, not a fact. Even more so, it's an opinion that has no evidence - none whatsoever.

Until you can get to that point, there is no debate to be had here.

Here's one last point to give you:

If I started claiming that the SFA were biased towards Celtic, what would be different to your claims?

You have to admit though,the look on his sour,bitter bake is priceless

Jason, if an Iraqi citizen told you that under Sadaam the government were mainly Sunni and Sunni's were treated better than shiites who formed the majority of the population would you doubt him.

If an Israeli arab told you Jews were treated better in Israel would you doubt him?

Somehow I don't think you would so why do you find it so hard to believe that an SFA dominated by Rangers men would want their team to beat their biggest rivals?

You would struggle to find a more classless individual than Mr Lennon.

Doesn't want to be interviewed so sends out the equally deluded Thompson to do it and then ends up slavering pish on Twitter.

McCoist may be one of the most overrated players ever in Scottish football history and may prove to be a total shiite manager but classless? Don't think so.

As for Walter Judas Smith thats a different matter.

maybe the next time you both get a free minute watch mccoist and his antics on the touchline the last time the scum beat celtic.hes a disgrace and his actions on the sidelines sends the hate signals to the animials in the stands,im sure many a fan would have done a lot more to norris had they got him.all i and many neutrals would ask how did he get his referee badge.neil lennon wears his heart on his sleeve and the celtic supporters love him .i guess we will have to take being scottish champions this year,and for the formidable future,along with some european football.not a bad season eh

"i guess we will have to take being scottish champions this year,and for the formidable future,along with some european football. not a bad season eh"




Champions in a 1 horse race and embarrassed in 2 cup competitions, what a great season. Bet you can't wait for the embarrassing CL exit to a team from Azerbaijan!

and he is still a feckin arrrsehole. cheers.

And I had one number up on Sat night and nearly won the lottery, Feck get a grip.

As i have said before with him and celtic, SAME OLD SAME OLD.
He and his team choke in the big games, then try and take the easy way out by giving the blame to everyone else. YAWN YAWN!!!
The "man" is a clown and they should get shot of him.

Can anyone explain why they think there would be no bias?

Will no one answer this question? If there is bias then NL's so called antics are totally justified so why don't one of you NL haters tell us why he is so wrong in the way he sees it?