the delusion continues

be very nervous about the game tomorrow zipi

how many times have we won the big one only to lose the next to a diddy team like dunfermline. Kayal a huge loss

Good luck to my beloved Celts today.Going to game and now 2012 so 40 years since attended first game.Hail Hail

4K will bring an easy 1K

you must take heed of what joe says .
after all he has been spot on for the last 3 seasons.

longchamps     02 Jan 12 14:08 
you must take heed of what joe says .
after all he has been spot on for the last 3 seasons.


surely you are not an embarrassed  rangers fan hiding behind a new username

Is this you setting up another attack Joe when a couple of players come in you never heard of. Lustig for me could be the 1st choice right back in time. Diawara i hope comes as he unlike Bangura has a good goalscoring record. I would be fine with Carlos Cuellar coming in on a free. I think big Sammy will go in January ironically when he is playing well but time to get a couple of mill for him maybe 3.

I will never understand the bangura signing

I noticed in the paper today that Dorian Goian has accused Scotland's refs for giving too many 50-50 decisions against Rangers this season. He does have a point imo and if Celtic fans feel similar last season, and they genuinelythink there is a masonic conspiracy, well, that's well and truly blown out of the water this season.


Just as a matter of interest, has anyone seen thebrave posting lately?? He stalked me for a good while, but it was all in good fun. Anybody know how he's getting on?

Thanks for that zip. Have you seen thebrave posting?

He does have a point imo and if Celtic fans feel similar last season, and they genuinelythink there is a masonic conspiracy, well, that's well and truly blown out of the water this season.

The pundits couldn't say for definite the ball crossed the line after endless slow motion replays so it's difficult to see how any referee in the country would've called a goal (even a referee who's apparently got eyes in the back of his head). The linesman clearly was unsighted going by the pictures as otherwise a goal would've been awarded (his hooper offside hardly indicated he was a micky).

That takes us to the two sending offs against St Mirren. I know Ally thought the St Mirren player went down too easily but this is the same Ally who reckoned Aluko had been poleaxed for the penalty he won against Dunfermline. Obviously stewarty sees it the same way though and thinks Rangers two SPL games against ICT this season have been refereed fairly. He probably thinks the penalty awarded to Hearts by Boughera's bestest buddie at Parkhead was a stonewall hand ball unlike Jelavic's against ICT. And what about that penalty the huns got for holding against Hibs. Stewarty obviously thinks` trapping a fairy's hand with your forearm is much more severe than having Bsrtley hold your shirt.

One German murdered by a Jew does not excuse the holocaust.

HNY stewarty. No referee did more for Rangers last year than Willie Collum. The eyes in the back of the head penalty, the Hamilton offside goal / penalty denied and the 3 penalties and sending offs at Tannadice. This very young man's meteoric rise to the top has got nothing to do with his refereeing ability. When we were guessing who was going to be the new Dougie McDonald who would've dreamed it would be the crucifix man.

All true Feck but things are on a much fairer and equal balance since Lennon was brave enough to take the inevitable abuse for standing up for the truth on these matters. Assuming this equal balance between all teams continues, it really has to for the SPL to function, then Scottish football can start to rise again with all the new financial measures and restrictions coming into all leagues to stop the widening divide in standard all stemming from greed.

zip, nothing has changed.

longchamps, where did I say the ball didn't cross the line? What I will say is this. That "goal" will be dragged up every time a dodgy decision goes against Celtic or for Rangers. It's good to see that you huns are finally moving on from that shy Roy Aitken supposedly took for you decades ago.

zip, at what point do you believe this remarkable transformation within the sfa took place. Was it after they decided to let Boughera & Diouf off with a fine so they'd be available for the run in? Was it after the ICT game where Celtic were denied two stonewallers? Was it after they replaced Dallas with a man who has never seen any bias in the 29 years he's been following Scottish football?


longchamps, I agree with your half-witted pal who was on the phone in. "It was 95% over the line".


Do you agree Hooper was well onside when through one on one with McGregor? Do you agree the foul on Forster was a sending off offence?

for the record there is no way any ref or linesman could have gave the goal such was the speed it all happened at.

we dont agree im saying it was a goal .
youre saying the ball hadnt crassed the line.

I don't think anyone can say it was definitely a goal. It probably was but I don't think it matters in the debate we're having. Others have put forward the hypothesis that the ref & linesman were pro-Celtic but, like yourself, I'm saying they couldn't possibly have called a goal such was the speed it all happened at whereas the two important calls they did have control over both went Rangers way.

feck the fact that you wont accept that the ball crossed the line
how can anyone listen to any other grievances you might have.
in fact how can anyone discuss anything with you.