|
By:
Jumpy seething NAP
Jumpy and ImAllIn same person NB p.s. how can the system be 100% when the Knicks lost night ![]() either way, gl [;)] |
|
By:
what a MUGGET
|
|
By:
ermm this sucks.
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
30 minutes away from the start of TIP 3, with odds of 1.72 and which will be the 3rd successive win. :)
To place a Lay multiple mate simply go into the multiple section and instead of backing a team just LAY them. Do this for all the teams and then just back the multiple like you usually would. |
|
By:
multi lay come on... that sucks.
5 games for 1.72. |
|
By:
newmember you seem to not be understanding anything I am saying.
multi lay sucks? lol I am more interested in placing winning bets as opposed to bets that look cool. Feel free to go and place a 8 team to win accumulator but The System produces winning bets. And 1.72 is amazing odds, if The System came up with 100 games for odds of 1.1 it would be amazing odds still because The System does not lose. |
|
By:
this is pretty embarrassing really...
![]() |
|
By:
97% suggests it does lose.
|
|
By:
just trying to empty my accounts and go all in on this value bet.
|
|
By:
[;)]
|
|
By:
90% of punters lose money on a regular basis. Its ridiculous how then you can abuse a system which has a 100% record and is bringing in guaranteed results. Because you can not understand the system you just insult it. Today will make it 3/3 without any doubt what so ever.
The System is genius, like I said if it produces a 20 team multiple with odds of 1.1 then it is a great bet because The System does not lose and is the most sophisticated advanced system ever created I believe. Just watch and wait for this bet to win, with solid odds of 1.72 |
|
By:
THE SYSTEM DOES NOT LOSE HE MEANS ITS A WINNING SYSTEM THERE MAY BE LOSING BETS WITHIN THE SYSTEM BUT THE SYSTEM IS PROFITABLE
ALLIN IM BEHIND YOU ALTHO NOT WITH MY MONEY BUT I LIKE YOUR STYLE AND YOUR RIGHT TOO MANY MUGS ON HERE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT FLASHY BETS PRIMADDONAS ON BETFAIR IMHO GALATICOS OF BETFAIR |
|
By:
are you level staking
![]() |
|
By:
lay 5 games for 1.72 is a bad deal.
|
|
By:
this will be funny...
![]() can you post your P & L for a while AllIn?? |
|
By:
simply brilliant!!
love this thread, what a breed of idiots on this site |
|
By:
hello c0cksucker9, hope you are well
![]() |
|
By:
![]() sounds like a mad scientist with this "system" nonsense i can't wait for the part of the thread where it all goes t1ts up ![]() |
|
By:
baker32
|
|
By:
you've got to give it to him, first of the multiples hosed in!
|
|
By:
WELL DONE MATE....
DONT LISTEN TO THE OTHER EJITS |
|
By:
Seething? Same person?
Hmm... lack of irony AND conspiracy theories... Is there intelligent life on any Betfair forum? May I take this opportunity to reassure the sad and the lonely out there, that I am not he. You can sleep soundly in your beds tonight. Now being rather bored with this thread,and at the risk of stating the yawningly obvious: It's a fun thread, guys. If it makes a longterm profit, we'll all choke eating our hats... becuase we won't have put any bets on his selections!!!!!!! (except, perhaps, by coincidence - deciding on the same bet, independently, once in a while. If anyone does bet on his actual selections, it will be with spare change - for an interest, passing the time, or whatever. If it sounds too good to be true... you know the rest. (Insert yawn smiley). Whether InAllin is nuts, naive (why on earth start a thread and put up with the predictable contributions?), a master conman, a benevolent genius, or whatever... nobody actually cares. None of us were born yesterday. Let's just be polite and generous - give him the rope, so to speak... and see what happens. He has entered the Lions Den, let us not add insult to injury. If he's wrong about his system, we all die in the end. If he's right, we all die in the end. And now, sensing my life ebbing away, time for something completely different. |
|
By:
Personally I'm still convinced he's Derren Brown. But I take medication for that.
|
|
By:
im behind u mate dont listen to knockers as you said IT TOOK YEARS TOO DEVELOP YOUR SYSTEM THE MUGS ON HERE HAVE NO PATEINCE
YOUR LIKE ME HAVE PATIENCE AND BELIEF WE WILL RISE TO THR TOP |
|
By:
Nothing personal but I laid Arsenal - 1.46 not good value imho. Come on the Hammers.
|
|
By:
Horrible thought - just jinxed myself, haven't I?
Life is just difficult, sometimes... Still, why cry when I can just get drunk and blow my brains out ![]() |
|
By:
Looking good fella, a win is a win [;)]
|
|
By:
good thread mate. except for all the haters on here but keep at it. a win is a win and ur bank will keep growing. good luck
![]() |
|
By:
TIP 3.
Tip 3 is a Multiple: Lay Crystal Palace Lay Wolves Lay Blackburn Lay West Ham Lay Osasuna Odds = 1.72 Well done but aren't accs supposed to produce massive payouts? Seems an awful risk and and awful lot of work considering I got odds of 2.12 Arsenal next goal a few mins before a very tired Wayne Bridge cropped Theo Walcott. Candy & babies but not hard work. |
|
By:
Jumpy would like to apologiose for all previous posts. Perhaps it's the beer but he is starting to think that some people are actually thinking there is such a system that could work.
Without doubting the sincerity of Imallin, the number of bets required to prove that system would be phenomenol. Just a few losers in a row would take a lot of winners to make up. The same number in roulette can come up 3 or 4 times in a row. Surprisingly regularly. Enough to blow anyone's bank (Mug would ne appropriate then). I am not great at Maths but 4 1/37 chances in a row, seems less likely than I'mallin having 4 losers in a row. that might be why he goes for acumulators - to avoid clusters like that. As a fun system for low stakes, perhaps. I give up. There is no head-in-hands smiley to end my posting (NEVER AGAIN) with. There is always a dumber form of gambling just waiting to be discovered. I have begun seething now -time to chill out. I have just one more word on the matter - MUGS |
|
By:
I have a fool-proof betting system. I call it Picking Winners
HTH |
|
By:
Well done.
You are making Money Tree and Coalman look like ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
I don't believe there is a system that works (arbs excluded), although I do believe that profits can be made from gambling using the age old knowledge of patience and discipline.
Whilst I'm prepared to give anyone the benefit of doubt, I will admit that the 5-Fold multiple was a bit disturbing, so early in the proceedings. I'll be surprised if this continues for much longer with bets like that. |
|
By:
Disturbing because the odds taken on that multiple were 10% worse than the singles equivalent yet this joker still thought it was value!
|
|
By:
Not sure how you work the acc v singles but assume you mean win fund all in to the next single etc. Rather like the threads re 'lay 0-0' . While I accept there is no 100%'system', substitute that word by 'method' and I think this thread is probably more promising than the 'lay 0-0' (Believe me I have suffered with that one). But look at the selections in yesterdays and most of those would have topped lists everywhere as 95% certs. Discipline is top challenge here
|
|
By:
Give the next bet alrdy, i want a new car!
|
|
By:
TIP 4 IN 5 MINUTES!!
|
|
By:
5mins? Hope thats enough time to finish my wank
|
|
By:
i thought you dont place bets greater than 1.5
|