Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 133
By:
BJT
When: 29 Dec 16 10:09

Dec 29, 2016 -- 10:04AM, Cardinal Scott wrote:


Bell should be opening!.....him coming in later when in trouble and a rising run rate not how you get best out of him.


Probably considered a team game though cricket isn't it?  These 2 average 64 or so opening, so why take that away, just because it doesn't suit Bell?

By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 29 Dec 16 10:15

Dec 29, 2016 -- 10:09AM, BJT wrote:


Dec 29, 2016 -- 10:04AM, Cardinal Scott wrote:Bell should be opening!.....him coming in later when in trouble and a rising run rate not how you get best out of him.Probably considered a team game though cricket isn't it?  These 2 average 64 or so opening, so why take that away, just because it doesn't suit Bell?


Marsh is back from injury and Klinger is out of nick and Bell shined when he opened for them 1st game.  If these 2 put on a big stand and win game then I'll be proven wrong!

By:
slip5
When: 29 Dec 16 10:16
this is pathetic batting ffs
By:
slip5
When: 29 Dec 16 10:17
better now play some shots plenty of batting left
By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 10:17
Digging a bigger hole for myself here.
By:
Cardinal Scott
When: 29 Dec 16 10:18
These mid range totals can be the worst of the lot to trade!
By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 10:18
Putting my faith in the two spinners.
By:
tomtimtum
When: 29 Dec 16 10:19

Dec 29, 2016 -- 10:18AM, Cardinal Scott wrote:


These mid range totals can be the worst of the lot to trade!


This is so true, hard to be confident of anything

By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 10:19
Nice.
By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 10:20
On the cusp now.
By:
DStyle
When: 29 Dec 16 10:21
brainless sh1t from marsh. stabby stabby against the bowlers he should have been going after, and then has a go at the only bowler you shouldn't.
By:
BJT
When: 29 Dec 16 10:22

Dec 29, 2016 -- 10:15AM, Cardinal Scott wrote:


Dec 29, 2016 -- 10:09AM, BJT wrote:Dec 29, 2016 -- 10:04AM, Cardinal Scott wrote:Bell should be opening!.....him coming in later when in trouble and a rising run rate not how you get best out of him.Probably considered a team game though cricket isn't it?  These 2 average 64 or so opening, so why take that away, just because it doesn't suit Bell?Marsh is back from injury and Klinger is out of nick and Bell shined when he opened for them 1st game.  If these 2 put on a big stand and win game then I'll be proven wrong!


Well I would think that even stronger argument to keep them where they are comfortable.  More chance getting form in a comfortable environment. 

But either way, with these 2 openers, the chances of Bell being under too much pressure when he comes in, is pretty slim.  One of them either fails, or they have **** all left to do.  Not like either of them are slow players.

Klinger averages 38 at 127, and Marsh 40.6 at 129.
Bell 28 at 122.

Hardly likely to do anything with stats like that.

By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 10:29
Cashed out for a nominal profit while I have a think.
By:
slip5
When: 29 Dec 16 10:32
**** batting is a compliment for this
By:
slip5
When: 29 Dec 16 10:33
finch diving around like jonty rhodes Laugh
By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 10:33
Gone for small bet on Scorchers but not intending to keep it.
By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 10:34
Gone already.
By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 10:37
Any views on what happens?
By:
tomtimtum
When: 29 Dec 16 10:38
Very finely balanced
By:
tomtimtum
When: 29 Dec 16 10:38
if Perth can get that RRR to 9+ it can rise pretty quickly from there, would fancy Perth then
By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 10:40
Had a dabble on Melbourne at 2.2. Purely on odds.
By:
tomtimtum
When: 29 Dec 16 10:40
5 overs left for Narine + Hogg
By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 10:42
And again at 2.4. I should learn to leave games like this alone. And now he's injured.
By:
tomtimtum
When: 29 Dec 16 10:43
Ouch
By:
slip5
When: 29 Dec 16 10:43
bowler done bravo gone
By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 10:44
And laid. I seem determined to get myself in a mess no matter what.
By:
slip5
When: 29 Dec 16 10:44

Dec 29, 2016 -- 10:42AM, Charlie wrote:


And again at 2.4. I should learn to leave games like this alone. And now he's injured.


your betting on low grade cricket

By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 10:46
I can assure you Slip this isn't low grade and I've bet on games which are.
By:
doridoru
When: 29 Dec 16 10:46
1 bowler aint gonna matter
By:
tomtimtum
When: 29 Dec 16 10:46
LaughLaugh
By:
doridoru
When: 29 Dec 16 10:46
LAY SCORCHERS NOW
By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 10:53
Out again now.
By:
DStyle
When: 29 Dec 16 10:54
i would have sent willey in. can't let finch go for 5 when bravo's just been stretchered off.
By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 10:54
Can't decide either way so will probably stay out now.
By:
jewell
When: 29 Dec 16 10:58
This is poor batting. They've hardly made any inroads in this run rate at all.
By:
jewell
When: 29 Dec 16 10:58
They look content to just take singles.Crazy
By:
BJT
When: 29 Dec 16 11:10
Yep, and they will go bang this over if Rimmington is on.  Look to go for 15 off it.
By:
Charlie
When: 29 Dec 16 11:15
Miles out BJ they got 16.
By:
BJT
When: 29 Dec 16 11:16
Sorry, my bad.  16 off it.
By:
MiddIeMan
When: 29 Dec 16 11:16
Most sixes.

Renegades at $1.40 if anyone is keen.
Page 3 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com