Nov 19, 2016 -- 3:50AM, Cardinal Scott wrote:
Terrible Liquidity!..think I'll move onto India where I am considering Laying India real low!
Get out now while you can. It will only get worse once the Eng game starts.
Nov 19, 2016 -- 3:04AM, the whizz kids wrote:
Bob, your a Big punter that likes good things. Have you had a look at under's on the Italy v S.A rugby tomorrow??
line 40 on the exchange would not like to betting on under's on that pal
Nov 19, 2016 -- 4:31AM, Whisperingdeath wrote:
These commentators do my head in! Why do we need a Test match over 4 days?
Nov 19, 2016 -- 4:56AM, Cardinal Scott wrote:
They need to take action on their run rate issue, that's at the root of Pak's trouble here.
Misbah got out addressing it. It's a tough balance although I agree that you really shouldn't be crawling along that painfully once set, even on a tough track.
Nov 19, 2016 -- 5:26AM, pxb wrote:
Needn't have worried about not covering the draw.
No, not much.
So hail could easily top score this innings.
Nov 19, 2016 -- 4:30AM, bobweenit wrote:
Nov 19, 2016 -- 3:04AM, the whizz kids wrote:Bob, your a Big punter that likes good things. Have you had a look at under's on the Italy v S.A rugby tomorrow??line 40 on the exchange would not like to betting on under's on that pal
It's gonna be a mudbath.
Nov 19, 2016 -- 6:40AM, the whizz kids wrote:
Nov 19, 2016 -- 4:30AM, bobweenit wrote:Nov 19, 2016 -- 3:04AM, the whizz kids wrote:Bob, your a Big punter that likes good things. Have you had a look at under's on the Italy v S.A rugby tomorrow??line 40 on the exchange would not like to betting on under's on that palIt's gonna be a mudbath.
Rain stopped, no bet.
Nov 19, 2016 -- 7:40PM, DAN1974 wrote:
Is there anything left in this game then ? I suppose if Pakistan can get the lead to 100 and then get a couple of quick wickets panic could set in.
Yeah, guess so but very hard to see 100 being defended even with early wickets, so doubt the market would go especially nuts unless something like 30/4 chasing 120 and 120 is a fair way off, albeit far from impossible. Think Pak needs another 90 runs to set 150 to keep it remotely interesting and that seems very unlikely.
Nov 19, 2016 -- 9:40PM, DAN1974 wrote:
55555555555555555555

Nov 19, 2016 -- 9:42PM, tomtimtum wrote:
Why didnt the idiots bat like this earlier instead of trying to grind out 2 runs an over
that was fecking madness yesterday wasn't it.
Nov 19, 2016 -- 9:39PM, DAN1974 wrote:
i really hope they can get up to 120-130 lead to make it interesting
I'd like more. I have 850 NZ red and 4K Pak green so if they can set enough to make a win actually plausible that would be lovely.
Nov 19, 2016 -- 9:42PM, tomtimtum wrote:
Why didnt the idiots bat like this earlier instead of trying to grind out 2 runs an over
Grant was right afterall
Nov 19, 2016 -- 9:55PM, peckerdunne wrote:
Grant where are you darts fan............ITS A ROAD MAN.............
Draw money printer.
Nov 19, 2016 -- 9:55PM, peckerdunne wrote:
Grant where are you darts fan............ITS A ROAD MAN.............
its too late pecker, they wasted too many wickets playing for dot balls, was very strange, if they batted like a 50 over match they would have 60 more runs atleast
Nov 19, 2016 -- 10:02PM, peckerdunne wrote:
Yes,but they did get the shine off the ball..........





